(01-03-2018 12:21 AM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  I'm happy for you guys that you've found your alpha male circle jerk. Really, nothing says real man like pretending to be a tough guy on the internet.

As opposed to presenting oneself as spineless, feckless, and dickless on the world stage??

(01-03-2018 09:41 AM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 12:21 AM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  I'm happy for you guys that you've found your alpha male circle jerk. Really, nothing says real man like pretending to be a tough guy on the internet.

As opposed to presenting oneself as spineless, feckless, and dickless on the world stage??

It is nice to have an America loving POTUS again instead of a mom jean wearing, gutless ussypay in the White House

KJU cucked hard, and all it took was a tweet.

Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

You try to turn every molehill into a mountain, and it bites you time and time again. When will you learn?

(01-03-2018 09:25 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Okay, so all you geniuses criticizing Trump's handling of this, how would you handle it? And oh, by the way, that means what would you do instead, so any statement about what you would not do is non-responsive to the question.

Simple. Nothing needed to be said/done at all. Especially since SK and NK are actually trying to open a dialogue surrounding the Olympics. This, in all likelihood, can only hurt that.

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?

Simple question.

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

It absolutely does. If there was any credence to your alt-left conspiracy theories, the markets would have plummeted at the open.

+0.35% now, BTW.

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 09:54 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Dow up 0.27%. I guess we're not going to nuclear war then?

Your TDS got the better of you yet again, alt-leftists.

And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?

Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

What happened the last time we had a dialogue with N Korea? peace in our time?

Treat your friends better than you treat your enemies. Obama treated our enemies better than Bush treated our friends. Trump is still sorting it out with our friends, but he does see, to be getting the treat your enemies worse part down.

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And I had breakfast today, so global hunger has been eradicated.

That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?

Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

(01-03-2018 10:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?

Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

Or rather, for those who are, well...simple.

(01-03-2018 10:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:05 AM)Kronke Wrote:  That doesn't make any sense.

Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?
Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

It's simple unless you spent 8 years licking Obama's rear end and can't come up with anything good. So you try to deflect. But that deflection pretty much admits it.

(01-03-2018 11:21 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Nor does in a blip in the Dow necessarily indicate the status of global war tensions.

Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?
Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

It's simple unless you spent 8 years licking Obama's rear end and can't come up with anything good. So you try to deflect. But that deflection pretty much admits it.

Dude, you're being ******* ridiculous.

If he's talking economy...the stock market boomed, right? So it was good. We weren't attacked...so that was good. NK ended up getting a deliverable bomb...so that could be considered bad for us...or good according to some looking to start another cold war.

Sorry, but I'm not going to ascertain what twisted thoughts are running through the mind of that troll...so he needs to provide a little more before I waste any more time on him.

(01-03-2018 11:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 11:21 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:10 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Was Obama's actions on NK good or bad for the US?
Simple question.

No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

It's simple unless you spent 8 years licking Obama's rear end and can't come up with anything good. So you try to deflect. But that deflection pretty much admits it.

Dude, you're being ******* ridiculous.
If he's talking economy...the stock market boomed, right? So it was good. We weren't attacked...so that was good. NK ended up getting a deliverable bomb...so that could be considered bad for us...or good according to some looking to start another cold war.
Sorry, but I'm not going to ascertain what twisted thoughts are running through the mind of that troll...so he needs to provide a little more before I waste any more time on him.

Umm, I think you just proved my point. The stock market bombed because of how Obama handled North Korea? Really? You are really stretching beyond reason to prop up your hero. I know you didn't agree with everything he did, but you were very firmly in his camp.

No we were not attacked, because he did not have the means to do so. But we stood idly by and watched him acquire those means.

(01-03-2018 11:36 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 11:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 11:21 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2018 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  No, that's not a simple question. What actions? Define "good" or "bad". Are you speaking of economics or something else?

Its a simple question for those who are not obtuse.

It's simple unless you spent 8 years licking Obama's rear end and can't come up with anything good. So you try to deflect. But that deflection pretty much admits it.

Dude, you're being ******* ridiculous.
If he's talking economy...the stock market boomed, right? So it was good. We weren't attacked...so that was good. NK ended up getting a deliverable bomb...so that could be considered bad for us...or good according to some looking to start another cold war.
Sorry, but I'm not going to ascertain what twisted thoughts are running through the mind of that troll...so he needs to provide a little more before I waste any more time on him.

Umm, I think you just proved my point. The stock market bombed because of how Obama handled North Korea? Really? You are really stretching beyond reason to prop up your hero. I know you didn't agree with everything he did, but you were very firmly in his camp.

No we were not attacked, because he did not have the means to do so. But we stood idly by and watched him acquire those means.

NO OWL! I was making a point based on what Kronke posted...basically claiming a blip in the market meant war with NK was off the table or whatever he was trying to claim.

And sorry, but I'm pretty sure you weren't in the camp of military action in Asia to keep them from getting a bomb, right? Since that was the only possible option besides diplomacy.