Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Split National Championship?
Author Message
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,007
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2370
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #21
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 03:13 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  My question has always been--why are we using a selection committee when we don't need to? We spend an entire season determining the best team in each FBS conference. If you truly want to keep the regular season relevant--then don't devalue a conference championship.

There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

With the current system, regular season games of all types are pure platinum. No team has ever made the playoffs with more than one loss.

In contrast, in other sports like the NFL, NBA, college hoops, etc. you can lose regular season games left and right and still make the playoffs. IIRC, the Tennessee Titans were 8-7 going in to their last game, and they made the playoffs anyway.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.
01-02-2018 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #22
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 09:30 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  UCF is another good argument for an actual playoff.

Only among a certain segment of the college football fanbase.
01-02-2018 10:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
johnbragg Offline
Five Minute Google Expert
*

Posts: 16,358
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 996
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 09:53 AM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:13 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  My question has always been--why are we using a selection committee when we don't need to?

It’s laughable that they haven’t figured this (8 teams, P5, G5 autobids, 2 wild cards) out yet. My guess is they probably realize this would be better but they’re getting pressure from the other bowls to keep that system propped up

The current system is the product of a political process, including a lot of powerful groups who liked the old system. It was a huge endeavor to go from the BCS choosing 2 teams to the CFP choosing 4 teams and adding another game. My guess is that the B1G and PAC haven't figured out to their satisfaction that an 8-team arrangement which completely devalues the Rose Bowl would guarantee them more money than the CFP setup where they have the Rose Bowl 2 years out of 3. (Or maybe you're talking about something more complicated than using the bowls as quarterfinals instead of semifinals, which introduces more uncertainty into projections.)

As for why we're using a selection committee, during the BCS a lot of the complaining was about the flaws in the BCS formulas, and how the numbers didn't reflect the "eye test", etc. Now, the CFP committtee is the focus of the complaints, and we'll probably see a shift back to a formula for the next iteration.

(01-02-2018 10:44 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.

CCG autobids make OTA-worthy big OOC matchups more attractive. With only 2 wildcards, it's going to be next to impossible to get a wildcard without a big OOC win. (Unless you're Nick Saban's Alabama, carrying the shadow of however many NCs and NCG appearances over the last 10 years.)

This year, your wildcards (2 highest ranking non-champs) would be Alabama and Wisconsin. Ouch. That doesn't help my theory. I shall have to think upon this. (BCS proxy rankings give the same result.)
01-02-2018 03:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,287
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3285
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-01-2018 05:28 PM)EvilVodka Wrote:  I don't think it would happen, but it would be hilarious if the AP Poll put UCF as #1 if Alabama wins the Playoff
03-lmfao
03-lmfao
03-lmfao

They might get a piece of one of the miscellaneous polls. There are some that frequently declare multiple champions.
01-02-2018 05:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 34,240
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 315
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #25
RE: Split National Championship?
That WOULD be funny.
01-02-2018 05:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
YNot Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,671
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 298
I Root For: BYU
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 10:44 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.

You've entirely bought in to the beauty pageant concept. Gotta have that nice and shiny win-loss record, even if that means Arkansas St., UL Lafayette, and The Citadel OR Alabama State, Southern Miss, and Liberty OR Charleston Southern, Colorado State, and Idaho OR Northwestern State, ULM, and UAB - all at home, of course - in the OOC.

Your OOC record would still heavily affect your at large eligibility to make the playoff as a non-champ and your seeding, even if you are a champ, which directly influence who and where you play in Round 1.

Even if you win your conference, your OOC performance could be the difference between a road game in Columbus or Tuscaloosa or hosting the WMU or Boise St. Broncos....

I think it would benefit college football. More games become more meaningful for more teams. Some teams would intentionally schedule more difficult OOC games so as to be battle tested and improved for conference play. Of course, some schools will continue to skate on 3 easy home wins in the OOC, so they can prop up their nice and shiny records...
01-02-2018 06:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
johnbragg Offline
Five Minute Google Expert
*

Posts: 16,358
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 996
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 06:48 PM)YNot Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 10:44 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.

You've entirely bought in to the beauty pageant concept. Gotta have that nice and shiny win-loss record, even if that means Arkansas St., UL Lafayette, and The Citadel OR Alabama State, Southern Miss, and Liberty OR Charleston Southern, Colorado State, and Idaho OR Northwestern State, ULM, and UAB - all at home, of course - in the OOC.

Your OOC record would still heavily affect your at large eligibility to make the playoff as a non-champ and your seeding, even if you are a champ, which directly influence who and where you play in Round 1.

PRoblem is the data doesn't support that. This year, your wild cards would be Alabama and Wisconsin. Their OOC's are pretty weak, but they'd be in the field of 8.

The committee rewards fewest losses--and Massey's BCS simulator agrees.

Last year the wild cards would have been Ohio State (big win @ Oklahoma) and Michigan (with a win over No. 10 Colorado). So last year is a good data point for the idea that you need to schedule well OOC to get a wildcard.
01-02-2018 07:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,010
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 729
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 03:17 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 09:53 AM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:13 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  My question has always been--why are we using a selection committee when we don't need to?

It’s laughable that they haven’t figured this (8 teams, P5, G5 autobids, 2 wild cards) out yet. My guess is they probably realize this would be better but they’re getting pressure from the other bowls to keep that system propped up

The current system is the product of a political process, including a lot of powerful groups who liked the old system. It was a huge endeavor to go from the BCS choosing 2 teams to the CFP choosing 4 teams and adding another game. My guess is that the B1G and PAC haven't figured out to their satisfaction that an 8-team arrangement which completely devalues the Rose Bowl would guarantee them more money than the CFP setup where they have the Rose Bowl 2 years out of 3. (Or maybe you're talking about something more complicated than using the bowls as quarterfinals instead of semifinals, which introduces more uncertainty into projections.)

As for why we're using a selection committee, during the BCS a lot of the complaining was about the flaws in the BCS formulas, and how the numbers didn't reflect the "eye test", etc. Now, the CFP committtee is the focus of the complaints, and we'll probably see a shift back to a formula for the next iteration.

(01-02-2018 10:44 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.

CCG autobids make OTA-worthy big OOC matchups more attractive. With only 2 wildcards, it's going to be next to impossible to get a wildcard without a big OOC win. (Unless you're Nick Saban's Alabama, carrying the shadow of however many NCs and NCG appearances over the last 10 years.)

This year, your wildcards (2 highest ranking non-champs) would be Alabama and Wisconsin. Ouch. That doesn't help my theory. I shall have to think upon this. (BCS proxy rankings give the same result.)



The problem is how do you get some of these top G5 schools into the playoffs without adding them to the P5 conferences for raking in more money? I think Houston would find a way back into a power conference. I think Baylor actually stole their spot in the first round when the Big 12 formed. You do have TCU, Texas and Baylor in the same area of Texas.
The problem that the P5 faces are the schools like Boise State, San Diego State, Hawaii, Northern Illinois, Western Michigan, Memphis, UCF, USF, East Carolina and Cincinnati as part of the playoffs picture without adding them. They do think these top G5 schools could be part of the P5 picture in the future. I forgot BYU on this list as well along with Air Force, Army and Navy all 4 are more of tradition schools. Should the P5 conferences give these schools a Notre Dame like deal? It would have been a great matchup if UCF was giving an all sports spot in the Big 12 except for football. The UCF football could play 5 to 6 games against Big 12 schools, and the Big 12 Championship would have worked out unbeaten UCF Vs. oKLAHOMA. If UCF beats Oklahoma in the CCG? They would have taken on Georgia themselves. UCF's QB was not as arrogant like Baker Mayfield like keeping his mouth shut and not to insult your opponents. Baker called Georgia as Pretenders. That lit the fire under Georgia's behind to the point of beating Baker and the Sooners.
What should the P5 do if they see that some of the G5 schools are making money from tv viewerships and all that?
01-02-2018 07:48 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-02-2018 07:48 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:17 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 09:53 AM)Gamecock Wrote:  
(01-02-2018 03:13 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  My question has always been--why are we using a selection committee when we don't need to?

It’s laughable that they haven’t figured this (8 teams, P5, G5 autobids, 2 wild cards) out yet. My guess is they probably realize this would be better but they’re getting pressure from the other bowls to keep that system propped up

The current system is the product of a political process, including a lot of powerful groups who liked the old system. It was a huge endeavor to go from the BCS choosing 2 teams to the CFP choosing 4 teams and adding another game. My guess is that the B1G and PAC haven't figured out to their satisfaction that an 8-team arrangement which completely devalues the Rose Bowl would guarantee them more money than the CFP setup where they have the Rose Bowl 2 years out of 3. (Or maybe you're talking about something more complicated than using the bowls as quarterfinals instead of semifinals, which introduces more uncertainty into projections.)

As for why we're using a selection committee, during the BCS a lot of the complaining was about the flaws in the BCS formulas, and how the numbers didn't reflect the "eye test", etc. Now, the CFP committtee is the focus of the complaints, and we'll probably see a shift back to a formula for the next iteration.

(01-02-2018 10:44 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  There's an obvious problem there: If conference champs get in automatically, then that makes OOC matchups literally meaningless. You can go 0-3 or 0-4 OOC, so long as you win all your conference games, you're good as gold.

What your system would do is elevate the importance of conference games while totally devaluing OOC games. This is a bad idea, because if anything, from a national POV, it is OOC games that tell us more about the 'worthiness' of a team than conference games.

So for better or worse, the current college football system clearly does value regular season games moreso than any other major sport.

CCG autobids make OTA-worthy big OOC matchups more attractive. With only 2 wildcards, it's going to be next to impossible to get a wildcard without a big OOC win. (Unless you're Nick Saban's Alabama, carrying the shadow of however many NCs and NCG appearances over the last 10 years.)

This year, your wildcards (2 highest ranking non-champs) would be Alabama and Wisconsin. Ouch. That doesn't help my theory. I shall have to think upon this. (BCS proxy rankings give the same result.)



The problem is how do you get some of these top G5 schools into the playoffs without adding them to the P5 conferences for raking in more money? I think Houston would find a way back into a power conference. I think Baylor actually stole their spot in the first round when the Big 12 formed. You do have TCU, Texas and Baylor in the same area of Texas.
The problem that the P5 faces are the schools like Boise State, San Diego State, Hawaii, Northern Illinois, Western Michigan, Memphis, UCF, USF, East Carolina and Cincinnati as part of the playoffs picture without adding them. They do think these top G5 schools could be part of the P5 picture in the future. I forgot BYU on this list as well along with Air Force, Army and Navy all 4 are more of tradition schools. Should the P5 conferences give these schools a Notre Dame like deal? It would have been a great matchup if UCF was giving an all sports spot in the Big 12 except for football. The UCF football could play 5 to 6 games against Big 12 schools, and the Big 12 Championship would have worked out unbeaten UCF Vs. oKLAHOMA. If UCF beats Oklahoma in the CCG? They would have taken on Georgia themselves. UCF's QB was not as arrogant like Baker Mayfield like keeping his mouth shut and not to insult your opponents. Baker called Georgia as Pretenders. That lit the fire under Georgia's behind to the point of beating Baker and the Sooners.
What should the P5 do if they see that some of the G5 schools are making money from tv viewerships and all that?

That has been the traditional answer by the P5 David but the G5 has been building up and closing relative coaching and facility gaps.

The AAC, MWC, CUSA and SBC champions all won their bowl game. AAC and MWC champs over P5 competition and CUSA, SBC champs by a huge margin against G5 competition.

I just don't think the G5 can be quieted down by taking a school or 2 from them with several more prepared to step up and take their place.
01-02-2018 08:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #30
RE: Split National Championship?
Word on reddit is that UCF is organizing a NC parade...
01-03-2018 12:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
otown Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,165
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 255
I Root For: Florida
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 12:07 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Word on reddit is that UCF is organizing a NC parade...

They plan on a banner as well. Will be interesting to see if all the chest thumping was worth it in 5 years. I happen to think it will at minimum pay off for the program.
01-03-2018 05:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,874
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 482
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #32
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 05:01 AM)otown Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 12:07 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Word on reddit is that UCF is organizing a NC parade...

They plan on a banner as well. Will be interesting to see if all the chest thumping was worth it in 5 years. I happen to think it will at minimum pay off for the program.

It's already paid off amazingly in the form of free PR. Look how much press we're getting for free haha.
01-03-2018 07:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
otown Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,165
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 255
I Root For: Florida
Location:
Post: #33
RE: Split National Championship?
I was listening to Golic and Wingo this morning. Their opinion is that if they run the table again next year, they have to be in the conversation. Don't know how realistic it will be with an entire new coaching staff, but they do return a lot of people on the team next year. Also curious to see if MM makes a run at the heisman. He finished 8th this year.
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2018 08:23 AM by otown.)
01-03-2018 08:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke4 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,507
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Split National Championship?
I believe in the " in order to be the man you have to beat the man" rule. Well guess what, UCF beat the team that beat the teams in the championship game and went undefeated. Case close fellas, go have a blast at the parade and hang the biggest effing banner ever made. Congrats 04-cheers04-cheers04-cheers04-bow--- and any talk about strength of schedule is hogwash because you played the hand that you were dealt and hit a royal flush. YOU beat the crooked system and some "purist" feelings are hurt,,, SO EFFING WHAT
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2018 08:35 AM by Tigersmoke4.)
01-03-2018 08:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,007
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2370
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #35
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 08:30 AM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  I believe in the " in order to be the man you have to beat the man" rule. Well guess what, UCF beat the team that beat the teams in the championship game and went undefeated. Case close fellas ...

Well, first of all "beating the team that beat the teams" doesn't mean anything. As those teams weren't "the man" in the sense of beating the champion. Heck, Clemson was the champion and Syracuse beat them, but that didn't make Syracuse the champion.

Second, UCF isn't getting any share of any championship. So you can close your case all you want, but it will just be your opinion, i.e., meaningless.

07-coffee3
01-03-2018 08:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke4 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,507
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 08:50 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 08:30 AM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  I believe in the " in order to be the man you have to beat the man" rule. Well guess what, UCF beat the team that beat the teams in the championship game and went undefeated. Case close fellas ...

Well, first of all "beating the team that beat the teams" doesn't mean anything. As those teams weren't "the man" in the sense of beating the champion. Heck, Clemson was the champion and Syracuse beat them, but that didn't make Syracuse the champion.

Second, UCF isn't getting any share of any championship. So you can close your case all you want, but it will just be your opinion, i.e., meaningless.

07-coffee3
1) Syracuse wasn't undefeated
2) Clemson didn't make the CCG therefore they were not the man 01-wingedeagle
Your apple to oranges response indicates that you are being either stupid or desperate in your AAC hatred. Anyway I'll take my own advice to UCF fans and tell you to EFF OFF 04-chairshot03-nutkick
01-03-2018 09:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tigersmoke4 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,507
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 97
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #37
RE: Split National Championship?
On a side note, if I were in sports media I would be praying for Alabama to win. I wouldn't be able to vote for UCF fast enough. The only choices would be a 3rd place team that didn't even play in it's own CCG that most of the country has fatigue with vs the undefeated team that beat them and the team they played against with the one handed defensive player of the game and the up standing coach that stayed around to see it through. How many high volume clickable articles could I live off of for the next 9mo, or how much of a ratings boost could my radio/tv show garner for the next 9mo over covering spring practices the such.
01-03-2018 10:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,735
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2860
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 08:50 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 08:30 AM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  I believe in the " in order to be the man you have to beat the man" rule. Well guess what, UCF beat the team that beat the teams in the championship game and went undefeated. Case close fellas ...

Well, first of all "beating the team that beat the teams" doesn't mean anything. As those teams weren't "the man" in the sense of beating the champion. Heck, Clemson was the champion and Syracuse beat them, but that didn't make Syracuse the champion.

Second, UCF isn't getting any share of any championship. So you can close your case all you want, but it will just be your opinion, i.e., meaningless.

07-coffee3

But the CFP is just the opinion of a bought and paid for rigged committee. When you leave out the nations only undefeated team and they then prove themselves to be legitimate (as the dismissed top G5 has now in 4 of the last 5 NYD bowl games) you undermine the long term legeitimacy of the process. Im fine with a split champion. The selection committee has no one to blame but themselves--and honestly---the people who appointed the committee are really at fault. C'mon. All P5 representatives and no G5 representatives? Really? They thought that was reasonable, equitable, ethical, and fair?

Split National Championship. When you can show me where UCF lost a game I will conceded they have no leg to stand on. Until then--they have the most powerful claim of anyone. They never lost..not to mention in this case we have a common data point to use as a direct comparison. Your championship is based on ice skating judges who have been bought and paid for--serving on a committee that was so biased in its membership composition that they were afraid to even appoint a few G5 members that might consider another point of view.
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2018 11:20 AM by Attackcoog.)
01-03-2018 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,735
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2860
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 10:02 AM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  On a side note, if I were in sports media I would be praying for Alabama to win. I wouldn't be able to vote for UCF fast enough. The only choices would be a 3rd place team that didn't even play in it's own CCG that most of the country has fatigue with vs the undefeated team that beat them and the team they played against with the one handed defensive player of the game and the up standing coach that stayed around to see it through. How many high volume clickable articles could I live off of for the next 9mo, or how much of a ratings boost could my radio/tv show garner for the next 9mo over covering spring practices the such.

If the media wants an 8 team playoff, voting for UCF would be the quickest way to get there. 04-cheers
01-03-2018 11:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
goodknightfl Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,110
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 499
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Split National Championship?
(01-03-2018 08:50 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(01-03-2018 08:30 AM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  

Heck, Clemson was the champion and Syracuse beat them, but that didn't make Syracuse the champion.

Second, UCF isn't getting any share of any championship. So you can close your case all you want, but it will just be your opinion, i.e., meaningless.

07-coffee3

Cuse had a losing record. so duh... Clemson didn't even have a quality loss.
01-03-2018 11:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.