http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

(12-28-2017 07:52 PM)Once a Knight... Wrote:  http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

Dumb fanboy bloggete

(12-28-2017 07:52 PM)Once a Knight... Wrote:  http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

UCF, USF, Memphis, and Cincinnati to the B12. Sounds like a plan to me

(12-28-2017 08:32 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 07:52 PM)Once a Knight... Wrote:  http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

UCF, USF, Memphis, and Cincinnati to the B12. Sounds like a plan to me

Sounds like the B12 wants a demotion.

Funny article forgets the problem. Number 1 UT doesn't want to expand and last time I checked they have the block vote. They can and will bolt because they can. ACC takes them in a heartbeat. Number 2 OU's board of regents don't want to expand and Boren completely shut down expansion talk after regents shut him down. They go to the SEC if they say the word. The whole expansion fiasco was a complete embarrassment for the B12. I guess writers need to write to fill the space.

Stop just stop

(12-28-2017 08:32 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 07:52 PM)Once a Knight... Wrote:  http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

UCF, USF, Memphis, and Cincinnati to the B12. Sounds like a plan to me

Normally we wait until at least January before cranking up this stuff.

(12-28-2017 09:11 PM)8BitPirate Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 08:32 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 07:52 PM)Once a Knight... Wrote:  http://www.blackandgoldbanneret.com/how-...he-big-12/

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using CSNbbs mobile app

UCF, USF, Memphis, and Cincinnati to the B12. Sounds like a plan to me

Normally we wait until at least January before cranking up this stuff.

I was thinking April 1st...

Drugs and holidays don’t mix, as evidenced by this thread.

Gimme a swig of your toxic eggnog. I wanna envision Wichita State to the B12-2+4.5 as a bball only.


T


...

Offseason thread

Just a fan boy fantasy. Not happening any time soon. Best we can hope for short term is a much better AAC deal.

(12-28-2017 09:45 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  Gimme a swig of your toxic eggnog. I wanna envision Wichita State to the B12-2+4.5 as a bball only.

Naah. Just Wichita. Big 12 needs 20 conference games.

I didn't even click the link. Espn just paid $10 million not to expand. There is no expansion in the next 8 years.

The article’s writer expresses a fundemental lack of understanding about these RSN’s and college networks.

1). ESPN doesn’t really want to start a conference Network. They get pushed into it occasionally (thats why the ACC Netowrk is on the way)—but they have no burning desire to start a new one. They have plenty to do just to launch the ACC Network.

2). The value in the Fox Regionals is driven almost exclusively by professional sports rights,
. College sports programming is largely just filler for these regionals. There simply isn’t enough money earmarked for college rights at these regionals networks to drive P5 realignment.

It's wishful thinking that I would love to see become reality.

(12-29-2017 10:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The article’s writer expresses a fundemental lack of understanding about these RSN’s and college networks.

1). ESPN doesn’t really want to start a sonferencd Network. They get pushed into occasionally—but they have burning desire to start a new one. They haven’t even launched the ACC Network yet.

2). The value in the Fox Regionals is driven almost exclusively by professional sports rights,
. College sports programming is largely just filler for these regionals. There simply isn’t enough money earmarked for college rights at these regionals networks to drive P5 realignment.

You wanna give point 1) another shot???

(12-29-2017 10:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The article’s writer expresses a fundemental lack of understanding about these RSN’s and college networks.

1). ESPN doesn’t really want to start a sonferencd Network. They get pushed into occasionally—but they have burning desire to start a new one. They haven’t even launched the ACC Network yet.

2). The value in the Fox Regionals is driven almost exclusively by professional sports rights,
. College sports programming is largely just filler for these regionals. There simply isn’t enough money earmarked for college rights at these regionals networks to drive P5 realignment.

Actually the ACC Network has started...it just hasn't launched their channel 24/7 yet. It will happen and be a success.

I could envision ESPN putting many 2nd tier AAC games on the RSNs. I see ESPN actually paying more to the AAC for their games. You guys have earned it and should be able to get a nice bump as ESPN will need inventory.

(12-29-2017 11:31 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(12-29-2017 10:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  The article’s writer expresses a fundemental lack of understanding about these RSN’s and college networks.

1). ESPN doesn’t really want to start a sonferencd Network. They get pushed into occasionally—but they have burning desire to start a new one. They haven’t even launched the ACC Network yet.

2). The value in the Fox Regionals is driven almost exclusively by professional sports rights,
. College sports programming is largely just filler for these regionals. There simply isn’t enough money earmarked for college rights at these regionals networks to drive P5 realignment.

You wanna give point 1) another shot???

Fixed it. lol...typing fast on an Ipad is clearly not my strong suit.

we gone