Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Author Message
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #1
Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
http://jamiedupree.blog.ajc.com/2017/12/...ent-trump/

Senate rules have allowed the Democrats an unprecedented amount of obstructionism on nominees.

Those four Georgians – all of whom had been through confirmation hearings in recent months – were part of a larger group of 100 nominations sent back, as the Senate wrapped up work for the year.
While no one knows for sure who objected to the individual nominations – the Senate does not release that information – the feeling in the halls of the Capitol was clear, that most of these moves were probably made by Democrats, already at odds with President Trump on a number of fronts, especially over nominations.
At issue is a Senate rule XXXI, which plainly states that “Nominations neither confirmed nor rejected during the session at which they are made shall not be acted upon at any succeeding session without being again made to the Senate by the President.”
Normally at the end of the first year (session) of Congress, most of the nominations that have not been acted on are ‘held over’ to the next year – but that did not happen in 2017.
This list of nominees sent back to the White House is so expansive, that it takes almost five full pages to list them in the Senate’s “Executive Calendar” for nominations.
In a review of similar year-end situations in the Senate over the last 25 years, this was by far the largest number of nominees returned to the White House.
At the end of 2003, the Senate sent back 17 nominations made by President George W. Bush.
At the end of 2009, the first year for President Barack Obama, the Senate returned eight nominations.
12-24-2017 12:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,311
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #2
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
And if the GOP doesn't mention this obstructionism every chance they get in front of a microphone and camera they are truly the stupid party.
12-24-2017 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
McConnell needs to be retired. He still lives in a different era and is simply not very effective.
12-24-2017 01:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Online
Legend
*

Posts: 25,717
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1187
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #4
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 01:36 PM)bullet Wrote:  McConnell needs to be retired. He still lives in a different era and is simply not very effective.

Truthfully it's not his fault.

The Senate was built for gentlemen to act in an orderly and professional manner thus individual senators have a lot of power to really slow things down. Since senators are now nothing more than state wide elected congressmen, this power is ripe for abuse
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2017 01:45 PM by solohawks.)
12-24-2017 01:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dawgitall Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,259
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 200
I Root For: ECU/ASU/NCSU
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.
12-24-2017 01:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 46,167
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 4536
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

Thank you Harry Reid.
12-24-2017 01:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


solohawks Online
Legend
*

Posts: 25,717
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1187
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #7
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process
12-24-2017 01:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dawgitall Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,259
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 200
I Root For: ECU/ASU/NCSU
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 01:59 PM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process

It was dirty pool, but politics is by definition dirty pool. Lets just not pretend that any party has clean hands.
12-24-2017 03:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 03:23 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:59 PM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process

It was dirty pool, but politics is by definition dirty pool. Lets just not pretend that any party has clean hands.

Lets not pretend the Democrats aren't doing 10 times what the Republicans did either.
12-24-2017 03:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dawgitall Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,259
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 200
I Root For: ECU/ASU/NCSU
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 03:34 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 03:23 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:59 PM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process

It was dirty pool, but politics is by definition dirty pool. Lets just not pretend that any party has clean hands.

Lets not pretend the Democrats aren't doing 10 times what the Republicans did either.

That is about the most partisan post I can imagine.04-bow
12-24-2017 04:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,179
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Are they? I would like to see evidence that the D’s are obstructing at a rate 10 x’s Of what the R’s did. That claim is straight out of ww.pulledthatoneoutmyass.com
12-24-2017 04:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 04:02 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 03:34 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 03:23 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:59 PM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:50 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Thank goodness this would never happen when it is a Supreme Court nominee.

At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process

It was dirty pool, but politics is by definition dirty pool. Lets just not pretend that any party has clean hands.

Lets not pretend the Democrats aren't doing 10 times what the Republicans did either.

That is about the most partisan post I can imagine.04-bow

Obama had 8 nominees sent back. Trump has over 100. I know Democrats like to pretend facts don't exist, only opinions. But facts do exist.
12-24-2017 04:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Republicans also never forced votes on every single procedural item to slow nominees. What the Democrats have done has NEVER been done before anywhere close to this scale. They are trying to disrupt the government using arcane Senate rules and destroy Americans faith in government. In other words, they are being Putin's minions. Putin could never buy the help the Democrats are giving him (or maybe he already has-he sure paid Bill and Hillary).
12-24-2017 04:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,633
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 04:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Are they? I would like to see evidence that the D’s are obstructing at a rate 10 x’s Of what the R’s did. That claim is straight out of ww.pulledthatoneoutmyass.com

Read the link Mach.
12-24-2017 04:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dawgitall Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,259
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 200
I Root For: ECU/ASU/NCSU
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 04:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 04:02 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 03:34 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 03:23 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  
(12-24-2017 01:59 PM)solohawks Wrote:  At least they were up front about the strategy to allow the American people to have a say in the process

It was dirty pool, but politics is by definition dirty pool. Lets just not pretend that any party has clean hands.

Lets not pretend the Democrats aren't doing 10 times what the Republicans did either.

That is about the most partisan post I can imagine.04-bow

Obama had 8 nominees sent back. Trump has over 100. I know Democrats like to pretend facts don't exist, only opinions. But facts do exist.

Have you seen some of the incompetent nominees they have put forward?
12-24-2017 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dawgitall Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,259
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 200
I Root For: ECU/ASU/NCSU
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 04:07 PM)bullet Wrote:  Republicans also never forced votes on every single procedural item to slow nominees. What the Democrats have done has NEVER been done before anywhere close to this scale. They are trying to disrupt the government using arcane Senate rules and destroy Americans faith in government. In other words, they are being Putin's minions. Putin could never buy the help the Democrats are giving him (or maybe he already has-he sure paid Bill and Hillary).
After the stunt the Republicans pulled on Obama's Supreme Court nominee your indignation doesn't seem sincere or justified. 07-coffee3 What goes around comes around.
12-24-2017 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,179
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Speaks to the extreme nature of Trumps nominees. It’s like he proposes the least qualified candidate to every position. Sad
12-24-2017 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,179
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
These yokels will never get it.

They flipped the Supreme Court by obstruction yet have the temerity to complain.
12-24-2017 04:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,311
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #19
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
(12-24-2017 04:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These yokels will never get it.

They flipped the Supreme Court by obstruction yet have the temerity to complain.

No, we replaced a constitutionalist justice with another constitutionalist justice. Had the unqualified Garland been seated the court would have been flipped. We maintained the status quo.

When the walking corpse Ginsberg croaks we'll flip the Supreme Court. And I'll enjoy watching you cry and ***** and moan when it happens.
12-24-2017 04:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,179
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Senate rules leave lots of nominees in limbo
Fascist
12-24-2017 05:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.