RE: Basketball Recruiting Question
sleepy is on the right track. a generation ago recruiting was far more local. ohio, indiana, michigan, kentucky and the chicago area were-and still are to a degree- elite high school basketball territory. MAC teams didn't always get great talent, that primarily went to the Big 10 and few national programs that recruited the region. but, if it was a good year for high school talent in ohio, some of those studs spilled over to the MAC or a big talent who had say a speech impediment -Ron Harper, family trauma -Gary Trent, was undersized -Craig Thames, Earl Boykins. could find their way to a MAC school. since the age of nichols, several things have transpired.
1) Recruiting has gone national on several level. More D1 teams overall who recruit a larger area. More AAU programs that show off good talent and sort of under the radar type kids. And HS basketball academies where a lot of Midwestern kids go for their final year of HS and get seen by more college recruiters.
2) Disinvestment in public education. The foundation of good players was a culture of great public league (and often Catholic school) programs. often, beginning in elementary. School had more resources and paid coaches. they were more of an anchor in their communities with a lot of long time staff, family connections and community involvement. Now, big public school have less money. Many kids attend small charter schools that don't have sports, have high teacher and staff turnover, and little connection to neighborhood sports programs, rivalries, etc... In Toledo, you used to be able to go to a typical Woodward-Devilbiss HS game and see 3-4 guys with college talent. Maybe, not the grades or focus, but the game. A lot of those big neighborhood HS are gone or a shell of themselves and don't have the good feeder programs of middle school and elementary basketball. A handful of private schools and still big public HS now mostly dominate the game and load up on talent. Less kids are getting playing time to develop against good competition.
3) MAC emphasis on football shifted resources in that direction. The MAC often had a couple good football teams back in the day and did put some good ones into the NFL, but now every MAC team invests a lot of it's athletic money and energy on football. Plus, with title IX, non football monies have shifted somewhat towards women's sports. The MAC now plays more tv football, sends more players to the NFL and more teams are competitive nationally to a degree but basketball has lost a little of the focus. While MAC football is on tv a lot and gets a recruiting bump. MAC basketball has essentially zero nationally tv exposure or brand and now isn't even shown on local tv.
4) Coaching turnover. The MAC was a league with some long time capable coaches in the 60s-80s/early 90s. Some of these guys were old school and had limitations but they knew the game, knew how to coach it and knew the regional high school scene. Often, they had longtime assistants. Today, the MAC is a stopping point for the most part for head and assistant coaches. The league lacks some of the stability and continuity it once had.
also, the transfer and movement of players issue is overblown as a MAC or UT problem. Transfers are very common everywhere and some non-MAC schools have much high turnover of players.
|