http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/...pport.html

Quote:Some of the top congressional Democrats blasting President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and move the U.S. Embassy there have in fact supported that very position in the past.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., penned a letter to the president last week, urging him not to move the embassy. Feinstein’s letter said the move would “spark violence, further alienate the United States and undermine the prospects of a two-state solution.”

“The future of Jerusalem is an issue that should be decided by Israel and the Palestinians, not unilaterally by the United States,” Feinstein wrote.

But Feinstein was among those who voted for a 1995 law passed by Congress that required “the relocation of the United States embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.” The measure also required the U.S. recognize the city as the capital of Israel.

Quote:Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Senate Democrats, slammed Trump's decision as well.

"There’s a reason why all past US administrations have not made this move, and why leaders around the world have warned Trump against it: It would undermine the prospects for an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement and severely, perhaps irreparably, damage our ability to broker it," Sanders posted on Twitter.

But Sanders supported a resolution in June titled "A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem," which mentions keeping Jerusalem as the "undivided capital of Israel."

The call to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was also included in the official Democratic Party platforms of 2016 and 2008: “While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement.”

(12-06-2017 04:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/...pport.html

Quote:Some of the top congressional Democrats blasting President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and move the U.S. Embassy there have in fact supported that very position in the past.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., penned a letter to the president last week, urging him not to move the embassy. Feinstein’s letter said the move would “spark violence, further alienate the United States and undermine the prospects of a two-state solution.”

“The future of Jerusalem is an issue that should be decided by Israel and the Palestinians, not unilaterally by the United States,” Feinstein wrote.

But Feinstein was among those who voted for a 1995 law passed by Congress that required “the relocation of the United States embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.” The measure also required the U.S. recognize the city as the capital of Israel.

Quote:Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Senate Democrats, slammed Trump's decision as well.

"There’s a reason why all past US administrations have not made this move, and why leaders around the world have warned Trump against it: It would undermine the prospects for an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement and severely, perhaps irreparably, damage our ability to broker it," Sanders posted on Twitter.

But Sanders supported a resolution in June titled "A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem," which mentions keeping Jerusalem as the "undivided capital of Israel."

The call to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was also included in the official Democratic Party platforms of 2016 and 2008: “While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement.”

#TDS, Feinstein also went off on illegal immigration and the cost to taxpayers, school districts etc circa 95'.

it's gotten to the point where they're simply not worth listening to on the basis of merit or argument.....

I'll never get tired of repeating myself with this one...........

#HENCE,TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It doesn't matter what they said before. To the Libturds it matters what they say now solely because the Libturds DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY SAID BEFORE. It only matters because it suits them NOW.

(12-06-2017 04:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  But Sanders supported a resolution in June titled "A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem," which mentions keeping Jerusalem as the "undivided capital of Israel."

Pfft. June 2017 was like a thousand milllion years ago.

(12-06-2017 06:05 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:52 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  But Sanders supported a resolution in June titled "A resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem," which mentions keeping Jerusalem as the "undivided capital of Israel."

Pfft. June 2017 was like a thousand milllion years ago.

is that >< nov, 2016??? or the impending March impeachment lingo.......

I can't help myself.....here's a more current version under their skull cap....it's still black and white

Quote:The call to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was also included in the official Democratic Party platforms of 2016 and 2008: “While Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations, it should remain the capital of Israel, an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths. Israelis deserve security, recognition, and a normal life free from terror and incitement.”

Wonder where Mr "MUH PARTY PLATFORM" is?

Just kidding....I expect him to ignore this like he ignores all the hypocrisy that comes out of his party.

That Feinstein has a Senatorial vote of record in 1995 shows that her old arse has sat in that position far too long.

The time for term limits is NOW.

Joe Scarborough Chastises Trump’s Jerusalem Decision, But He Voted For It In 1995


(Click on pic for video)


A lot of Democrats did. Trump is just the first President who came through and fulfilled what he said he would, in accordance with the law. Clinton, Bush and Obama all welshed.

(12-06-2017 07:41 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Joe Scarborough Chastises Trump’s Jerusalem Decision, But He Voted For It In 1995


(Click on pic for video)


A lot of Democrats did. Trump is just the first President who came through and fulfilled what he said he would, in accordance with the law. Clinton, Bush and Obama all welshed.

it's the damnedest thing I ever seen.....people piss their pansies when someone makes a statement.........................then follows through.....

that's some serious psycho shite, eh???

I literally can't laugh any harder.....hell, 4:20 has become passe with these lunatic fringe whackjobbers.....

it gets easier and easier as she rises and sets.....

edit: does squirmy mika only own one form of clothing.....and.......does msnbc make it a point to accentuate the ta-tas w/o the full view as opposed to fox with the females wearing painted garb continually tugging on the hem????

Leftist hypocrisy is par for the course gentlemen. Their opposition to Trump is the only thing keeping them from withering on the vine. It keeps the accountability light off of their sorry buttus cheekuses.

I guess Trump didn't get the memo that politicians all just say stuff they don't mean in order to get elected with no plans to follow through with what they said. I really think the lobs biggest problem with Trump is that he's keeping his promises.

(12-06-2017 11:49 PM)banker Wrote:  I guess Trump didn't get the memo that politicians all just say stuff they don't mean in order to get elected with no plans to follow through with what they said. I really think the lobs biggest problem with Trump is that he's keeping his promises.

AMEN!

in political scope, it's unheard of.....that's politico blasphemy....

biatches on both sides love being lied to w/o a whimper except the biatching across the aisle....

I have no clue why I backed DJT out of the gate....

keep ******* yourselves biatches......see how that shite works out moving forward.....

#bufordpusserisherefor3more

Wow! Someone might have changed their mind since 1995.

(12-06-2017 11:54 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Wow! Someone might have changed their mind since 1995.

and who might that someone be mr. special???

(12-06-2017 05:57 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  It doesn't matter what they said before. To the Libturds it matters what they say now solely because the Libturds DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY SAID BEFORE. It only matters because it suits them NOW.

They simply don't care. Their #1 goal is impeachment. They don't care if they look/sound like buffoons/hypocrites, etc it the process. It's mental.

How I miss the days when liberals just wore berkenstocks and fanny packs and hugged trees. Then something happened on the way to the forum, the progressives - radicals and Marxists all - co-opted the liberal movements and now they are impossible to tell apart because the old style liberals have all been shouted down. They've been neutered - de-nutted again - and marginalized by the very people they now support, even if only by proxy.

(12-06-2017 11:54 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Wow! Someone might have changed their mind since 1995.

As was pointed out....Bernie supported this in June and the current platform of the DNC calls for it.


But by all means continue with the "MUh 1995!"

Damn good thing that conservatives are never hypocritical.