(12-06-2017 01:24 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:21 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Already on the second page, and not a single conservative poster is willing to discuss the actual topic of the thread? No surprise here.

Because the hypocritical water carrier is m.i.a. in all the other related threads.

Might want to check before you make factually incorrect statements.

Now why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

(12-06-2017 01:25 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Then don't vote for him

Why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Man, you guys really don't want to address the question, do you?

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:20 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Now why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

It was calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and it failed. After the election, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again. Give it up.

Two signed photos, Moore acknowledging he knows two of the accusers before he now states he knows none of them, Moore stating he did date teens at that time, Moores own comments stating he first "noticed" his wife as a 30 year old man when she was 15 years old, multiple accusers backing up stories showing Moore was known for targeting teens. These accusations are credible because of the supporting evidence, Moores own actions, and those unconnected to the accusers confirming their stories.

You will not find many examples of 30+ year old sexual assault which has more supporting evidence than this.

Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

(12-06-2017 12:53 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  Gee our "non partisan" "non tribal" poster can't be found on the frankin thread but is here.

I'm shocked!

Kiddo is still not allowed to vote for Jones, either.

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

So you think a Democrat is worse than someone who preys on young teens as a 30+ year old man? Is that the GOP's official stance? They did give him $170K.

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:20 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Now why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

It was calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and it failed. After the election, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again. Give it up.

Two signed photos, Moore acknowledging he knows two of the accusers before he now states he knows none of them, Moore stating he did date teens at that time, Moores own comments stating he first "noticed" his wife as a 30 year old man when she was 15 years old, multiple accusers backing up stories showing Moore was known for targeting teens. These accusations are credible because of the supporting evidence, Moores own actions, and those unconnected to the accusers confirming their stories.

You will not find many examples of 30+ year old sexual assault which has more supporting evidence than this.

Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

(12-06-2017 01:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:20 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Now why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

It was calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and it failed. After the election, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again. Give it up.

Two signed photos, Moore acknowledging he knows two of the accusers before he now states he knows none of them, Moore stating he did date teens at that time, Moores own comments stating he first "noticed" his wife as a 30 year old man when she was 15 years old, multiple accusers backing up stories showing Moore was known for targeting teens. These accusations are credible because of the supporting evidence, Moores own actions, and those unconnected to the accusers confirming their stories.

You will not find many examples of 30+ year old sexual assault which has more supporting evidence than this.

Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

Again, that means nothing coming from you. You are fake news.

So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

(12-06-2017 01:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:22 PM)Kronke Wrote:  "credibly"

It was calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and it failed. After the election, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again. Give it up.

Two signed photos, Moore acknowledging he knows two of the accusers before he now states he knows none of them, Moore stating he did date teens at that time, Moores own comments stating he first "noticed" his wife as a 30 year old man when she was 15 years old, multiple accusers backing up stories showing Moore was known for targeting teens. These accusations are credible because of the supporting evidence, Moores own actions, and those unconnected to the accusers confirming their stories.

You will not find many examples of 30+ year old sexual assault which has more supporting evidence than this.

Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

Again, that means nothing coming from you. You are fake news.

why is the GOP donating money to a person accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

(12-06-2017 01:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Two signed photos, Moore acknowledging he knows two of the accusers before he now states he knows none of them, Moore stating he did date teens at that time, Moores own comments stating he first "noticed" his wife as a 30 year old man when she was 15 years old, multiple accusers backing up stories showing Moore was known for targeting teens. These accusations are credible because of the supporting evidence, Moores own actions, and those unconnected to the accusers confirming their stories.

You will not find many examples of 30+ year old sexual assault which has more supporting evidence than this.

Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

Again, that means nothing coming from you. You are fake news.

why is the GOP donating money to a person accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because it was a calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and once the election is over, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again.

(12-06-2017 01:46 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

Again, that means nothing coming from you. You are fake news.

why is the GOP donating money to a person accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because it was a calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and once the election is over, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again.

What are you basing that attack on the accusers on?

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because they are not credible. I don't accept the premise that you assert.

It's been discussed ad nauseam. I can't help you if you don't understand by now. I am beginning to think you don't have the mental capacity to comprehend the basic requirements needed to make an argument.

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

I believe him to be innocent. I believe this to be an egregeous hit job based on the timing of the accusations. And it's not like we have'nt seen this tactic used before. Think Clarence Thomas, think Anita Hill. Now you have said the timing makes perfect sense based on the "me too" movement. But I say to you, what about Jaunita Broadrick and Kathleen Willey and scores of other women that came forward to accuse a sitting US President of sexual malfeasence. They didn't need to cloak their actions behind a movement that to me at least seems unfair, what with the accused forced to prove their innocence.

Oh man, I have to imagine every adult sexual predator looking to prey on young teens sure is loving this new, improved GOP.

(12-06-2017 01:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 12:52 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source

Any of you GOP'ers with a conscious out there, just know your donations went to help elect a man who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault when they were teens. Two of these women, Moore now claims to have never met, a drastic change from his first interview on the matter where admitted to knowing them. His own statements admit he dated teens during that period, and previously had admitted to first "noticing" his decades younger wife when she was 15, in a dance recital he went to for no apparent reason. These are facts, and the GOP is still donating your money to him.

Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because they are not credible. I don't accept the premise that you assert.

It's been discussed ad nauseam. I can't help you if you don't understand by now. I am beginning to think you don't have the mental capacity to comprehend the basic requirements needed to make an argument.

What would you consider a credible accusation of similar claims? What other evidence would you expect to have?

Furthermore, what evidence do you have that their claim is not credible?

(12-06-2017 01:46 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:41 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Your reciting of the relevant facts isn't credible, because you have been proven to be fake news.

Cool, but why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

"credibly"

Again, that means nothing coming from you. You are fake news.

why is the GOP donating money to a person accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because it was a calculated, political attack by the amazon post, and once the election is over, we'll never hear from the accusers ever again.

Bingo! Just like the Access Hollywood "Grab 'Em By the *****" tape that was released to bring down Trump. (Of course, that didn't work.)

RELEASE THE YEARBOOK!

(12-06-2017 01:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Oh man, I have to imagine every adult sexual predator looking to prey on young teens sure is loving this new, improved GOP.

john conyers
al franken
bob menendez
jacob schwartz
john podesta
bob filner
dan schoen
tony mendoza
ira silverstein
raul bocanegra
anthony weiner
steve lebsock
eliot spitzer
david wu

bill clinton is a rapist.. infowars dot com