shere khan
Southerner
Posts: 60,747
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7540
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
|
Disappointed in Trump
He shouldn't have pardoned those turkeys. Shoulda chopped their heads off in front of God and everybody then hollered at the top of his lungs
Carnivore!!!!
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2017 09:02 PM by shere khan.)
|
|
11-21-2017 09:01 PM |
|
rath v2.0
Wartime Consigliere
Posts: 51,325
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2163
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
|
|
11-21-2017 09:04 PM |
|
EverRespect
Free Kaplony
Posts: 31,330
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1156
I Root For: ODU
Location:
|
Disappointed in Trump
I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
|
11-21-2017 09:05 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,903
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7030
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-21-2017 09:01 PM)shere khan Wrote: He shouldn't have pardoned those turkeys. Shoulda chopped their heads off in front of God and everybody then hollered at the top of his lungs
Carnivore!!!!
see the other thread (too edible(d) to look it up )
I'd a let 'em rot.....
#badexampleforyouth
if I had access to yell in his ear, I would....ol' boy ****** up on that one.....
|
|
11-21-2017 09:05 PM |
|
UCF08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
|
|
11-23-2017 06:01 PM |
|
EverRespect
Free Kaplony
Posts: 31,330
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1156
I Root For: ODU
Location:
|
Disappointed in Trump
Sortilege and treason.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
|
11-23-2017 06:04 PM |
|
cb4029
The spoon that stirs the pot.
Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
So violent. Typical.
|
|
11-23-2017 07:43 PM |
|
UCF08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 06:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote: Sortilege and treason.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
"Factual basis". You're missing the important part.
|
|
11-23-2017 07:55 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,778
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3208
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
|
|
11-23-2017 08:10 PM |
|
UCF08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,262
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 211
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
|
|
11-23-2017 09:26 PM |
|
JMUDunk
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
Posts: 29,591
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1731
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
|
Disappointed in Trump
My goodness.
Killing a couple (or not killing them) of crap Turkeys, even that gets the socialist left in a lather.
Hahaha, do you ever just take a day off of defending the Cank or whomever, and take a shower? Go see a movie or to the zoo? Lol
Relax. Sit back. And enjoy this flight. Only gonna be 7+ more years...
/giggles
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
11-24-2017 08:09 AM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,778
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3208
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 09:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
My point is that appointment of a prosecutor requires a specific fact situation not required to conduct just any investigation, and as I heard the question he was denying the former, not the latter.
Your point about no prosecution is a good one. Remember that Trump was good buds with the Clintons for years, and Sessions was in the senate with her, so both have shared establishment status with her, and those ties often run deeper than blood or water. But I think I’ve expressed agreement before with your larger point. Either start prosecuting her or stop calling her a criminal. Of course the statute may have run on her most egregious offense, unless the Vince Foster case can be made. Hmmm, the memory of Vince may suggest another reason for not prosecuting.
(This post was last modified: 11-24-2017 08:46 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
|
|
11-24-2017 08:45 AM |
|
EagleX
Wake me when the suck is over
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 706
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Happy Hour
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 09:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
insisting that the AG was saying that there were no facts to support the investigation for appointment of a special investigator when, in fact, he was merely stating what the requirements were for the appointment of a special investigator is a drastic misrepresentation of what he said. and you did it a lot. a lot.
I am somewhat gratified to see that you now admit your error. I presume we won't be seeing you spew that particular line of utter horseshit any longer. I rejoice at the improvement of mankind, no matter how tiny it may be.
|
|
11-24-2017 09:37 AM |
|
EagleX
Wake me when the suck is over
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 706
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Happy Hour
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-23-2017 09:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
ah. I neglected to highlight one additional point.
you were able to discover your defect all by yourself, without me providing "proof", or "evidence", or any of the ridiculous demands you were making upon me before you would finally unfuck yourself.
hopefully, we won't have a replay of that whole passive-aggressive line of unreasoning. I'm totally not here to do your homework.
|
|
11-24-2017 11:04 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,903
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7030
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-24-2017 11:04 AM)EagleX Wrote: (11-23-2017 09:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
ah. I neglected to highlight one additional point.
you were able to discover your defect all by yourself, without me providing "proof", or "evidence", or any of the ridiculous demands you were making upon me before you would finally unfuck yourself.
hopefully, we won't have a replay of that whole passive-aggressive line of unreasoning. I'm totally not here to do your homework.
she expects.....therefore, she demands.....and all this w/o an offering of substance....
|
|
11-24-2017 11:38 AM |
|
TigerBlue4Ever
Unapologetic A-hole
Posts: 72,622
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 5784
I Root For: yo mama
Location: is everything
|
RE: Disappointed in Trump
(11-24-2017 11:04 AM)EagleX Wrote: (11-23-2017 09:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-23-2017 08:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (11-23-2017 06:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote: (11-21-2017 09:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote: I think Trump should pardon Crooked Hillary, but not until she schits her pants with her head in a guillotine.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What would he pardon her for when his own AG won't initiate an investigation due to needing a factual basis?
That is a misrepresentation of what he said.
Granted, this wasn't a direct quote for the exact same question, but I don't see how I'm drastically misrepresenting what he said. He was lobbed a softball from a GOP congressman, listing all the causes for prosecution you'd find from some of our more conspiracy minded conservatives here, and ultimately said he'd need a factual basis which falls under the guidelines to appoint a special prosecutor. I suppose you could argue the guidelines to appoint the special prosecutor are the issue and that he has the factual basis, but then why isn't he move forward with a criminal case?
Fact is, if she's a criminal, this GOP administration should go after her. If not, they need to shut up about it because the only people who are ultimately responsible at this point for such an egregious criminal walking the streets are the GOP. His testimony only furthers that position.
ah. I neglected to highlight one additional point.
you were able to discover your defect all by yourself, without me providing "proof", or "evidence", or any of the ridiculous demands you were making upon me before you would finally unfuck yourself.
hopefully, we won't have a replay of that whole passive-aggressive line of unreasoning. I'm totally not here to do your homework.
|
|
11-24-2017 12:32 PM |
|