(11-20-2017 01:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a good article with the perspective of several residents of the town. Seems pretty clear this was just your typical neighbor dispute over yards rather than anything political.

The Bizarre True Story of the Neighborhood Scuffle That Left Rand Paul with Six Broken Ribs

No one cares about the alt-leftists that GQ was able to dig up and lie for/sympathize with alt-left terrorist rene boucher.

Did you even read the story? They didn't exactly paint the dude as sane, nor did they excuse the attack. They basically labeled him as unstable and surmised that the injuries were more consistent with Paul being stomped on.

So kindly STFU with your alt-left nonsense. This meme you keep trying to construct is so ridiculous it's comical.

(11-20-2017 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 01:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a good article with the perspective of several residents of the town. Seems pretty clear this was just your typical neighbor dispute over yards rather than anything political.

The Bizarre True Story of the Neighborhood Scuffle That Left Rand Paul with Six Broken Ribs

No one cares about the alt-leftists that GQ was able to dig up and lie for/sympathize with alt-left terrorist rene boucher.

Did you even read the story?

No, I don't read alt-left publications that sympathize with #resistance terrorists. I know how you disguise links (it's the only way you can get someone to click it), so I just hovered over it and saw that it was gq.

(11-20-2017 02:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 01:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a good article with the perspective of several residents of the town. Seems pretty clear this was just your typical neighbor dispute over yards rather than anything political.

The Bizarre True Story of the Neighborhood Scuffle That Left Rand Paul with Six Broken Ribs

No one cares about the alt-leftists that GQ was able to dig up and lie for/sympathize with alt-left terrorist rene boucher.

Did you even read the story?

No, I don't read alt-left publications that sympathize with #resistance terrorists. I know how you disguise links (it's the only way you can get someone to click it), so I just hovered over it and saw that it was gq.

Ummmm....dude. Your argument is with the owner of this site. The hyperlink icon provides a pop-up for the link and then a popup to put in the title of the article. This displays the link in the post in the form that your whining like a little ***** over. Nobody is disguising anything. How pathetic are you...seriously?

And then you take the time to comment on a story like you know what's in it when you haven't even done the due diligence to even know what's in it....thereby making yourself a complete fool.

I have no such argument with the owner of the site. A simple copy/paste of a link with create a hyperlink. You disguise the links to hide the source.

(11-20-2017 03:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  I have no such argument with the owner of the site. A simple copy/paste of a link with create a hyperlink. You disguise the links to hide the source.

You're a ******* liar. I'm not the one shaming the source here without even bothering to read it.

Not to mention that I've covered this same ridiculous petty tripe at least a half dozen times now...each time explaining that you can hover over the link before clicking on it AND YOU EVEN ******* ADMITTED YOU DID THAT!?!?!

(11-20-2017 04:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 03:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  I have no such argument with the owner of the site. A simple copy/paste of a link with create a hyperlink. You disguise the links to hide the source.

You're a ******* liar. I'm not the one shaming the source here without even bothering to read it.

Not to mention that I've covered this same ridiculous petty tripe at least a half dozen times now...each time explaining that you can hover over the link before clicking on it AND YOU EVEN ******* ADMITTED YOU DID THAT!?!?!

^^ Unhinged.

Rand Paul’s Assault Is One Of MSNBC Host’s ‘Favorite’ Stories

It was common among liberals on social media to say about the Paul attack it was their ‘favorite story.’ Apparently Hunt let her personal feelings slip out. MSNBC quoting GQ. Now that is some powerful leftist media connection there.

Quote:MSNBC host Kasie Hunt called the story of Senator Rand Paul’s recent assault one of her “favorite stories,” on “MSNBC Live” Monday.

“New details today on the incident that left Senator Rand Paul with six broken ribs. This might be one of my favorite stories, although of course we don’t, uh want — clearly Senator Paul is still struggling,” she said.

She went on to quote GQ magazine about the incident and brought up Paul’s Libertarian leanings.

“GQ reports that lawn care issues may well have been at the heart of the dispute. A neighbor told the magazine,” Hunt said. She said Paul’s neighbor pays $150 a month to maintain his lawn, while Paul does his own landscaping.

“I guess that’s the libertarian in him,” she added. “There you have it ladies and gentleman. The reason for the first assault on a sitting U.S. Senator in decades.”

Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, maintains the dispute was not about lawn care and said there was “no motive” that could justify the attack.

Video in link....

(11-20-2017 07:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 04:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 03:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  I have no such argument with the owner of the site. A simple copy/paste of a link with create a hyperlink. You disguise the links to hide the source.

You're a ******* liar. I'm not the one shaming the source here without even bothering to read it.

Not to mention that I've covered this same ridiculous petty tripe at least a half dozen times now...each time explaining that you can hover over the link before clicking on it AND YOU EVEN ******* ADMITTED YOU DID THAT!?!?!

^^ Unhinged.

No, totally hinged and totally rational. Merely posting links doesn't always give you the whole address of the story nor the website anyway. Nor does it give you the title of the article so you might ascertain its purpose. Yet you make up stories that I'm purposely trying to hide something from you or someone else when in fact you're well aware of the fact that what I did is totally normal and within the parameters of this site. And further, you're also well aware of how you easily it is to ascertain the source of the link by merely hovering over it, which again you admitted you did.

And further, you're one of the ones who also continually trot out this idiotic "junior moderator" tripe when anyone tries to correct your behavior which likely warranted a special sticky post from the moderators to tell you and others to knock it off.

Face it dude, you're little more than a troll and moreover a veritable cancer to this site. Now I'll use my better judgement going forward to completely ignore you and stop clicking on the link to show your posts...which I hope I have finally learned have virtually no redeeming value here.

Thank you for the link. I still stand by everything I've said in this thread. Don't let the 4 or 5 unhinged posters on the far right get you down

(11-21-2017 10:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 07:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 04:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-20-2017 03:03 PM)Kronke Wrote:  I have no such argument with the owner of the site. A simple copy/paste of a link with create a hyperlink. You disguise the links to hide the source.

You're a ******* liar. I'm not the one shaming the source here without even bothering to read it.

Not to mention that I've covered this same ridiculous petty tripe at least a half dozen times now...each time explaining that you can hover over the link before clicking on it AND YOU EVEN ******* ADMITTED YOU DID THAT!?!?!

^^ Unhinged.

No, totally hinged and totally rational. Merely posting links doesn't always give you the whole address of the story nor the website anyway. Nor does it give you the title of the article so you might ascertain its purpose. Yet you make up stories that I'm purposely trying to hide something from you or someone else when in fact you're well aware of the fact that what I did is totally normal and within the parameters of this site. And further, you're also well aware of how you easily it is to ascertain the source of the link by merely hovering over it, which again you admitted you did.

And further, you're one of the ones who also continually trot out this idiotic "junior moderator" tripe when anyone tries to correct your behavior which likely warranted a special sticky post from the moderators to tell you and others to knock it off.

Face it dude, you're little more than a troll and moreover a veritable cancer to this site. Now I'll use my better judgement going forward to completely ignore you and stop clicking on the link to show your posts...which I hope I have finally learned have virtually no redeeming value here.

You're cussing, typing in all caps complete with exclamation marks, calling me a cancer, an idiot, and a troll, and using the word "dude" in every post. You come off as completely unhinged to anyone outside of the alt-left bubble. To my credit, throughout your latest episode, I have never once called you a name or used any expletives.

You know you're hiding links in attempt to disguise the source, just admit it. It's not even a big deal.

I don't have a clue what you're talking about and who or what a "junior moderator" is, but the sticky had to do with tom in lazybrook's constant thread derailing ("whataboutism"), not me.

Rand Paul’s Wife Eviscerates Media For Falsely Reports About Assault On Her Husband



They minimized his injuries and victim-blamed him for his leftist neighbor attacking him. They also haven’t bothered to explore the real reason for the attack, which the FBI has said is political.

Quote:Rand Paul’s wife, Dr. Kelley Paul, eviscerated the media and the neighbor who attacked her husband in an opinion piece for CNN.

Senator Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, was the victim of a vicious attack on November 3rd. His neighbor reportedly tackled him from behind and left him with six broken ribs, three displaced ribs, a pleural effusion, and pneumonia.

Kelley writes in CNN that since the attack, her husband has not taken a single breath without pain.

“As his wife, I have been distraught over seeing him suffer like this,” she says. “There have been several nights where I had my hand on my phone ready to call 911 when his breathing became so labored it was terrifying.”

http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/22/rand-p...y-husband/

Kelley is not someone that I would want to piss off. Not that I would have any expectation that she would even consider physical violence, but she’s a very strong woman whom I would not want as an adversary.

(11-22-2017 01:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Rand Paul’s Wife Eviscerates Media For Falsely Reports About Assault On Her Husband



They minimized his injuries and victim-blamed him for his leftist neighbor attacking him. They also haven’t bothered to explore the real reason for the attack, which the FBI has said is political.

Did you not see the story I posted above from GQ where they interviewed several folks all over town as to the reason for the attack?

And do you have any sort of proof that the FBI has already determined this to be a political attack?

I see that the day after there were reports that the FBI believed it was, but that's a tad early to make that the definitive cause. Additionally, the first reports from the Kentucky State Police that appeared in the local media in Bowling Green said Paul was "fine" and was not even transported to the hospital. So why would you conclude the injuries were excessive with that reporting up front?
Senator Paul Assaulted at Home in Bowling Green

Also, this story was covered everywhere in the media and everyone knew he had several broken ribs...I don't see anyone taking this lightly. Not to mention, I've not seen one report where anyone blamed Paul for this attack.

And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

gq is fake news

(11-22-2017 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

They didn't get laughed off. The responses were to question whether that really caused the problem. The SOB lied all the time, why wouldn't he lie about that.

(11-22-2017 03:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

They didn't get laughed off. The responses were to question whether that really caused the problem. The SOB lied all the time, why wouldn't he lie about that.

Are we establishing that if someone lies about one thing, they are probably lying about everything?

(11-22-2017 09:28 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 03:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

They didn't get laughed off. The responses were to question whether that really caused the problem. The SOB lied all the time, why wouldn't he lie about that.

Are we establishing that if someone lies about one thing, they are probably lying about everything?

No.

I think we are establishing that if someone lies repeatedly and preposterously about many things, then another absurdly preposterous story is probably a lie too.

(11-22-2017 09:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 09:28 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 03:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

They didn't get laughed off. The responses were to question whether that really caused the problem. The SOB lied all the time, why wouldn't he lie about that.

Are we establishing that if someone lies about one thing, they are probably lying about everything?

No.

I think we are establishing that if someone lies repeatedly and preposterously about many things, then another absurdly preposterous story is probably a lie too.

Hrmmmm....

Who else could this apply to that you're not applying it to? Man, I just can't think of exactly who, but there is certainly one prominent person who fits that bill, that you're not up in arms over. Who could it be?

(11-23-2017 11:21 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 09:51 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 09:28 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 03:03 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-22-2017 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And if memory serves, didn't Harry Reid's serious injuries from his treadmill fall get laughed off by many a Republican here and nationally?

They didn't get laughed off. The responses were to question whether that really caused the problem. The SOB lied all the time, why wouldn't he lie about that.

Are we establishing that if someone lies about one thing, they are probably lying about everything?

No.

I think we are establishing that if someone lies repeatedly and preposterously about many things, then another absurdly preposterous story is probably a lie too.

Hrmmmm....

Who else could this apply to that you're not applying it to? Man, I just can't think of exactly who, but there is certainly one prominent person who fits that bill, that you're not up in arms over. Who could it be?

Obama? Hillary? Trump? Which one did you have in mind? They're all liars.

(11-22-2017 02:26 PM)Kronke Wrote:  gq is fake news

YEP! We know gq leans left, way left