"I want Memphis"

Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Understand your logic but there aren't any ranked schools in the MAC or in your bowl options. Sorry, the P6 has spoken.

(11-04-2017 08:09 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Understand your logic but there aren't any ranked schools in the MAC or in your bowl options. Sorry, the P6 has spoken.

And we want sec, acc, big 10, and Big 12 teams. Not unranked g4 teams.

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Aww, you’re still thinking of us! But, we’ve moved on, and maybe it’s time you did as well. We’ll always have Boca!

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

(11-04-2017 10:44 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

My comment was, “ At this point in the season “. By week nine in the CFB season most teams show either some sort of progression or regression. Tulsa, IMO, is still a pretty good team, but with a rash of injuries/bad luck are definitely not the team they were early on. Obviously, Memphis( a damn good team) exposed that last night. Toledo has been steadily improving from the Miami loss and hopefully will maintain the progress they are showing.
Good luck the rest of the way and if a NY6 Bowl falls your way, you’ve got a Rocket fan rooting for the Tigers, or any AAC team that should make it in...

(11-04-2017 11:14 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:44 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

My comment was, “ At this point in the season “. By week nine in the CFB season most teams show either some sort of progression or regression. Tulsa, IMO, is still a pretty good team, but with a rash of injuries/bad luck are definitely not the team they were early on. Obviously, Memphis( a damn good team) exposed that last night. Toledo has been steadily improving from the Miami loss and hopefully will maintain the progress they are showing.
Good luck the rest of the way and if a NY6 Bowl falls your way, you’ve got a Rocket fan rooting for the Tigers, or any AAC team that should make it in...

They dont want to hear that.... They dont want to hear from anyone in the G5... Just like the P5 doesnt want to hear from them.

(11-04-2017 11:17 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 11:14 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:44 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

My comment was, “ At this point in the season “. By week nine in the CFB season most teams show either some sort of progression or regression. Tulsa, IMO, is still a pretty good team, but with a rash of injuries/bad luck are definitely not the team they were early on. Obviously, Memphis( a damn good team) exposed that last night. Toledo has been steadily improving from the Miami loss and hopefully will maintain the progress they are showing.
Good luck the rest of the way and if a NY6 Bowl falls your way, you’ve got a Rocket fan rooting for the Tigers, or any AAC team that should make it in...

They dont want to hear that.... They dont want to hear from anyone in the G5... Just like the P5 doesnt want to hear from them.

G4/P6

It's getting annoying having to correct you all the time.

Lol....stick to Tuesday night MACtion ladies.

Well, this thread backfired quite nicely.

(11-04-2017 11:14 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:44 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:58 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Yes. I want any team who is ranked and worth our time. Temple is not allowed to lose to us anymore.

Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

My comment was, “ At this point in the season “. By week nine in the CFB season most teams show either some sort of progression or regression. Tulsa, IMO, is still a pretty good team, but with a rash of injuries/bad luck are definitely not the team they were early on. Obviously, Memphis( a damn good team) exposed that last night. Toledo has been steadily improving from the Miami loss and hopefully will maintain the progress they are showing.
Good luck the rest of the way and if a NY6 Bowl falls your way, you’ve got a Rocket fan rooting for the Tigers, or any AAC team that should make it in...

Nice recovery from the wagging finger.

FYI, Memphis has lost half its starting D, and had another 7 or 8 out for periods. Yet, we are WAY better than we were early in the season.

(11-04-2017 11:17 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 11:14 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:44 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:36 AM)FMRocket Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 10:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Worth your time?

Let's see, using transitive logic with our one common opponent (Tulsa):

Final Score: Memphis 51, Toledo 27.

Not worth Memphis' time.

Memphis 51 Toledo 27
At this point in the season... Highly doubt it...

What part of transitive math do you not get? Toledo beat Tulsa by 3, at home. Memphis beat Tulsa by 27, on the road. That's a spread of 24. The difference between 51 and 27 = 24.

And if I factor in home field vs. the road, on a neutral field in a bowl game, Memphis should win by 28 points, lol.

I realize I am using transitive logic, which seldom works, especially the longer the string becomes, but factoring in results against common opponents IS a factor used by the CFP Selection Committee.

Meanwhile, the only logic you are using is your own opinion.

So take your wagging finger and trot on back home.

My comment was, “ At this point in the season “. By week nine in the CFB season most teams show either some sort of progression or regression. Tulsa, IMO, is still a pretty good team, but with a rash of injuries/bad luck are definitely not the team they were early on. Obviously, Memphis( a damn good team) exposed that last night. Toledo has been steadily improving from the Miami loss and hopefully will maintain the progress they are showing.
Good luck the rest of the way and if a NY6 Bowl falls your way, you’ve got a Rocket fan rooting for the Tigers, or any AAC team that should make it in...

They dont want to hear that.... They dont want to hear from anyone in the G5... Just like the P5 doesnt want to hear from them.

Don't lump me in that group. I read and respond to anything interesting or wrong, from any source.

Although I do wonder what compels people to come to other conference boards and argue with folks.

^ That was some good subtle shade.

(11-04-2017 12:48 PM)St. H. Gink Wrote:  Well, this thread backfired quite nicely.

It was inevitable. Sorta like one of us going over to an SEC board and saying, "We want Alabama or Georgia."

Toledo fan wants Memphis because they are unfairly being denied a shot at the NY6 bowl slot............

Where did that guy go???

Ohio is no slouch, but dang-a-lang!!!

TM

Bump

(11-03-2017 07:29 AM)UofToledoFans Wrote:  Its hard to think we (Toledo) have 4 weeks of potential moving up in the polls with virtually no shot at the NY6 game...but it is what it is.

The MAC has no P5 or AAC agreement and will have 6 or 7 bowl teams for 5 slots. Some things will get shifted around to have Toledo play Memphis/UCF/USF/SMU.

I want Memphis.