I can’t believe how many people were trolled in this thread.

(11-04-2017 01:51 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 12:45 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^^^lol

As another UC fan so eloquently put it, Bama would club UCF (or any other AAC team) like a baby seal...

If you can't see that you either don't understand the difference between Alabama's program and the rest of us or you're just a blind Homer

Why would you wanna club a baby seal? Look how cute they are...

A hungry human

(11-04-2017 01:44 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  You're clinging on to your argument with every bit of strength you have left lol.

Yes, there is talent at G5 schools. Every school in the country has some talent. There is just way more at the bigger programs. Facts.

You can go through the entire history of you want. Go ahead and post it too. Compare the top 25 P5 programs vs the entire G5 all 60+ schools and see who has the most NFL players.

Just stop.

Take the names off the roster and do it blindly.

UCFs roster vs Alabama's.

Or any other top P5 program.

Just stop dude. Everyone has pointed out how ridiculous you've looked in this thread already.

Yet no one has proven any of my arguments wrong, not once. The only counterpoint I've I've seen so far is "LOL" and opinions. Your opinions are no more facts than my opinions. Again, I never said UCF would beat Alabama, just that they could beat them. Prove that opinion wrong with definitive facts, not opinions.

Also, entire history is an odd way to look at a progressing college football history. In 1972 Title IX passed reducing, the than unlimited, number of scholarships a school could offer to 105. With unlimited schools could hide players on 5th and 6th string with promises and never fulfill those promises yet keep those players away from other schools. The limit was again reduced to 95 in 1978, than to the current 85 in 1992.

At the same time cable television was expanding, coincidently in 1978. This gave more exposure to potential recruits offering them other options other than Ohio State, Michigan, Alabama, etc.

So when we look at "entire" history, it's not as long a period as you might expect. New powers can develop in relatively short periods of time, or old powers can fall back.

Since we're looking at history, lets go a little more recent. Alabama was forced to vacate 21 wins from 2005 through 2007 due to rule violations. They vacated 8 more wins in 1993. Ironically Auburn was ineligible for post season play that year as well and couldn't play in the SEC championship game. Lots of cheating going on with the big boys I suppose.

In 2003 they were 4 and 9 and the following year they were 6 and 6. So even without multiple violations, they can still such, and I predict that their days of sucking are not complete once coaching changes and/or more rules violations occur.

7-0 SMU

Alabama would wax UCF

(11-04-2017 06:46 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  7-0 SMU

Alabama would wax UCF

Ah no, it's 14-7 UCF over 6 and 2 SMU, 14th in the nation in total offense, scoring 36 at #8 TCU in a loss. Of course SMU is going to score points.

The idea that any SEC team has a cupcake schedule is absurd on its face. Just the conference schedule itself is hard enough on its own without playing anyone with a heartbeat OCC. Personally...I think UCF would give Alabama a good game. Win? Probably not.

(11-05-2017 09:27 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  The idea that any SEC team has a cupcake schedule is absurd on its face. Just the conference schedule itself is hard enough on its own without playing anyone with a heartbeat OCC. Personally...I think UCF would give Alabama a good game. Win? Probably not.

This is all UCF fans are saying.

Was listening to ESPNU radio the other day and I think it was Danny Kanell. He said that history shows, teams that have beaten or given Bama a scare the last few years have 4 ingredients:
1) True Dual-Threat QB (ie can pass)
2) Uptempo offense
3) Good DLine
4) A dose of luck

He wasn't talking about UCF, but those are qualities the team was built around.

TBD..