I am still unable to understand... we find something that works on a drive (that gets us a TD) and we decide not to do it again... WTF.

(10-28-2017 03:53 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:  JP says Rice has been 0-6 so far this year when behind at halftime.

No kidding, Sherlock!

I miss Saltzman...

(10-28-2017 03:53 PM)Antarius Wrote:  I am still unable to understand... we find something that works on a drive (that gets us a TD) and we decide not to do it again... WTF.

Maybe it’s a conspiracy

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  So.. we have one drive with two deep throws... that results in a TD. And then we abandon that completely. Am I missing something?

I love you, buddy, but don't know what you're talking aout? You don't risk throwing deep inside your own 5 yard line. Too much risk for a sack and safety. And on the next drive we did throw deep and it was intercepted.

(10-28-2017 03:57 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  So.. we have one drive with two deep throws... that results in a TD. And then we abandon that completely. Am I missing something?

I love you, buddy, but don't know what you're talking aout? You don't risk throwing deep inside your own 5 yard line. Too much risk for a sack and safety. And on the next drive we did throw deep and it was intercepted.

There's gotta be grey area between that and run it up the middle three times, punt, commit a personal foul.

(10-28-2017 03:57 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  So.. we have one drive with two deep throws... that results in a TD. And then we abandon that completely. Am I missing something?

I love you, buddy, but don't know what you're talking aout? You don't risk throwing deep inside your own 5 yard line. Too much risk for a sack and safety. And on the next drive we did throw deep and it was intercepted.

Ordinarily, I agree. After the endless discussion of wanting "to win it" and the fake FG last week- this would be a time I'd take a deep shot. When they aren't expecting you to. That said, we'd probably commit a hold in the endzone, so you have a valid point.

I didn't see the interception properly- was that an attempted deep ball that slipped?

(10-28-2017 04:03 PM)Antarius Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:57 PM)waltgreenberg Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  So.. we have one drive with two deep throws... that results in a TD. And then we abandon that completely. Am I missing something?

I love you, buddy, but don't know what you're talking aout? You don't risk throwing deep inside your own 5 yard line. Too much risk for a sack and safety. And on the next drive we did throw deep and it was intercepted.

Ordinarily, I agree. After the endless discussion of wanting "to win it" and the fake FG last week- this would be a time I'd take a deep shot. When they aren't expecting you to. That said, we'd probably commit a hold in the endzone, so you have a valid point.

I didn't see the interception properly- was that an attempted deep ball that slipped?

30 yard pass. Looked like Sam locked in on the receiver before throwing, and the CB jumped the play.

(10-28-2017 04:03 PM)Antarius Wrote:  I didn't see the interception properly- was that an attempted deep ball that slipped?

Posted earlier:

(10-28-2017 03:50 PM)Tomball Owl Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  LaTech ball. Glaesmann intercepted. 1:18 to go.

Wounded duck of a throw. Even both long passes he completed saw the receivers waiting on the ball. And yes all 3 were into the wind.

(10-28-2017 03:49 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:  Another slip-out-of-his-hand pass by Glaesman, according to JP and his partner ... hung up by the wind and intercepted. Sigh.

(10-28-2017 04:07 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 04:03 PM)Antarius Wrote:  I didn't see the interception properly- was that an attempted deep ball that slipped?

Posted earlier:

(10-28-2017 03:50 PM)Tomball Owl Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:48 PM)Antarius Wrote:  LaTech ball. Glaesmann intercepted. 1:18 to go.

Wounded duck of a throw. Even both long passes he completed saw the receivers waiting on the ball. And yes all 3 were into the wind.

(10-28-2017 03:49 PM)Almadenmike Wrote:  Another slip-out-of-his-hand pass by Glaesman, according to JP and his partner ... hung up by the wind and intercepted. Sigh.

It was a wounded duck. Eyewitness account. The QB has suspect hands.

(10-28-2017 03:56 PM)wiessguy Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 03:53 PM)Antarius Wrote:  I am still unable to understand... we find something that works on a drive (that gets us a TD) and we decide not to do it again... WTF.

Maybe it’s a conspiracy

Possibly a Russian Agent on the Rice Coaching Staff?

First possession of the 3Q...we're running right through their porous defense...get a 12 yard run to put us 1st and 10 from the 15 yard line...and we call time out??? WTF?

TD Rice.

La Tech's second offsides on a PAT.

(10-28-2017 04:24 PM)Frizzy Owl Wrote:  La Tech's second offsides on a PAT.

This La Tech team is not good.

come-on guys... you can do it

I was wondering when LaTech would start passing more.

28-14 after 3 quarters.

(10-28-2017 04:42 PM)RiceFootball2K5 Wrote:  28-14 after 3 quarters.

How many times has Rice score more than 14 in a game this season...?

(10-28-2017 04:44 PM)mrbig Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 04:42 PM)RiceFootball2K5 Wrote:  28-14 after 3 quarters.

How many times has Rice score more than 14 in a game this season...?

31 vs UTEP. Next high was 12 vs Army.

(10-28-2017 04:44 PM)mrbig Wrote:  

(10-28-2017 04:42 PM)RiceFootball2K5 Wrote:  28-14 after 3 quarters.

How many times has Rice score more than 14 in a game this season...?

Once. UTEP.