Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
Author Message
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,655
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3300
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #1
First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...s-memorial

George Washington's church is removing his and Lee's statue.

Actually this is one where I don't have a problem with it. Its a church. While connected to the church, Washington and Lee are not religious figures. The purpose of the church is primary.

But it says something sad about the country that people feel unwelcomed by a statue of George Washington. Also says something sad about our educational system.
10-28-2017 10:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,655
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3300
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #2
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/d...h-ashamed/
Editorial on the church removing the plaques.
10-29-2017 04:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bubbapt Offline
Uh, what?
*

Posts: 12,894
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 480
I Root For: Memphis
Location: St. Louis

Donators
Post: #3
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
"I could see a case for taking down the Lee plaque, though I would still call it an act of stunning and despicable ingratitude for a former parishioner and a family who gave much to that congregation. But Washington? Seriously, George Washington?!"
10-29-2017 04:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Offline
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7018
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
Post: #4
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-29-2017 04:23 PM)bubbapt Wrote:  "I could see a case for taking down the Lee plaque, though I would still call it an act of stunning and despicable ingratitude for a former parishioner and a family who gave much to that congregation. But Washington? Seriously, George Washington?!"

I live in Forrest (as in Beford) county MS (ya know, named after that KKK feller).....do you know how often I've given that a second's notice???? (rhetorical)

to be frank (as usual), only idiots think stupid shite like this matters.....only a dumbarse would attempt to erase history to provide the path to repeat previous mistakes...

how many times does one have to run into a brick wall head first before they realize that's a really stupid move??? (rhetorical)
10-29-2017 06:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,588
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1039
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #5
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-28-2017 10:04 AM)bullet Wrote:  George Washington's church is removing his and Lee's statue.... it says something sad about the country that people feel unwelcomed by a statue of George Washington. Also says something sad about our educational system.
It’s not statues being taken down. It’s two commemorative plaques. One says “In memory of George Washington” and the other says “In memory of Robert Edward Lee”.

But even that is too much for some people to bear.
10-29-2017 08:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
B_Hawk06 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 15,479
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 676
I Root For: UNCW / America
Location:
Post: #6
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-29-2017 08:22 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  
(10-28-2017 10:04 AM)bullet Wrote:  George Washington's church is removing his and Lee's statue.... it says something sad about the country that people feel unwelcomed by a statue of George Washington. Also says something sad about our educational system.
It’s not statues being taken down. It’s two commemorative plaques. One says “In memory of George Washington” and the other says “In memory of Robert Edward Lee”.

But even that is too much for some people to bear.

It's not in memory of George Washington. It's in memory of his pallbearers.
10-30-2017 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marc Mensa Offline
You'll Get Nothing and Like It
*

Posts: 14,255
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 682
I Root For: The Underdog
Location: Samaria
Post: #7
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
The church can and will do as it sees fit.
10-30-2017 08:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


B_Hawk06 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 15,479
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 676
I Root For: UNCW / America
Location:
Post: #8
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
I don't have an issue with a private church doing whatever they want.

I mean, there's all kinds of hypocrisy there, if they don't give whatever money Lee's family donated back to his descendants. I'm sure they're happy keeping monies donated from the Washington and Lee families while doing a little moral grandstanding.

I recall seeing a picture of a service that had about 8 parishioners in attendance. Wouldn't surprise me if this is a ploy to attract more parishioners.
10-30-2017 08:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marc Mensa Offline
You'll Get Nothing and Like It
*

Posts: 14,255
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 682
I Root For: The Underdog
Location: Samaria
Post: #9
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-30-2017 08:49 AM)CoastGuardHawk06 Wrote:  I don't have an issue with a private church doing whatever they want.

I mean, there's all kinds of hypocrisy there, if they don't give whatever money Lee's family donated back to his descendants. I'm sure they're happy keeping monies donated from the Washington and Lee families while doing a little moral grandstanding.

I recall seeing a picture of a service that had about 8 parishioners in attendance. Wouldn't surprise me if this is a ploy to attract more parishioners.

perhaps they need to put in a bowling ally or start having contemporary services? Maybe relocate to the suburbs?
(This post was last modified: 10-30-2017 08:57 AM by Marc Mensa.)
10-30-2017 08:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crebman Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,407
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 552
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #10
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-30-2017 08:46 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The church can and will do as it sees fit.

No argument that the church can do as they please.

I guess I find it astonishing how weak and thin skinned some people must be to be triggered by folks dead so long ago.......and how weak the church leaders today must be to be playing the game of attempting to erase history.

It's part of that churches history.......that history won't change. Its done.

We shouldn't be trying to hold those in the past to today's standards - my god, doctors used to bleed patients in Washington's time - we don't accuse those doctors of murder.

I've actually been in that church and thought it pretty cool that both of those famous Americans were members and actually attended services there....you knew they stood in those same aisles and sat in those same pews.
10-30-2017 09:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Marc Mensa Offline
You'll Get Nothing and Like It
*

Posts: 14,255
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 682
I Root For: The Underdog
Location: Samaria
Post: #11
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-30-2017 09:07 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(10-30-2017 08:46 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The church can and will do as it sees fit.

No argument that the church can do as they please.

I guess I find it astonishing how weak and thin skinned some people must be to be triggered by folks dead so long ago.......and how weak the church leaders today must be to be playing the game of attempting to erase history.

It's part of that churches history.......that history won't change. Its done.

We shouldn't be trying to hold those in the past to today's standards - my god, doctors used to bleed patients in Washington's time - we don't accuse those doctors of murder.

I've actually been in that church and thought it pretty cool that both of those famous Americans were members and actually attended services there....you knew they stood in those same aisles and sat in those same pews.

I think they've made the decision that the church is not the place to has out political argument. Their mission is to lead people to Christ and not to determine whether people are either weak-kneed or bigots.
10-30-2017 09:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,655
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3300
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #12
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
http://thefederalist.com/2017/10/30/icon...ashington/ The purpose of the SJWs is not to remove offense, but to create conflict.
(This post was last modified: 10-30-2017 09:15 PM by bullet.)
10-30-2017 09:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SuperFlyBCat Offline
Banned

Posts: 49,583
Joined: Mar 2005
I Root For: America and UC
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #13
RE: First Davis, then Lee, now George Washington
(10-30-2017 09:25 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  
(10-30-2017 09:07 AM)Crebman Wrote:  
(10-30-2017 08:46 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The church can and will do as it sees fit.

No argument that the church can do as they please.

I guess I find it astonishing how weak and thin skinned some people must be to be triggered by folks dead so long ago.......and how weak the church leaders today must be to be playing the game of attempting to erase history.

It's part of that churches history.......that history won't change. Its done.

We shouldn't be trying to hold those in the past to today's standards - my god, doctors used to bleed patients in Washington's time - we don't accuse those doctors of murder.

I've actually been in that church and thought it pretty cool that both of those famous Americans were members and actually attended services there....you knew they stood in those same aisles and sat in those same pews.

I think they've made the decision that the church is not the place to has out political argument. Their mission is to lead people to Christ and not to determine whether people are either weak-kneed or bigots.

These church leaders are week kneed bigots.
10-30-2017 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.