(10-26-2017 03:08 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(10-26-2017 11:58 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-26-2017 11:29 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 04:57 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:50 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  By your logic, abuse shouldn't include men who do and say everything under the sun to their spouses, but don't actually physically hit them.
Oh, and your knee-jerk reaction would be to believe all the spouses are lying when they say they're abused.

Yeah, that's DEFINITELY the way to go.

It hasn't been watered down; you're only now becoming more aware of just how frequently it happens, because more women are speaking out about it.

You don't have to require a rape kit, a trip to the hospital, or years of counseling to be assaulted or abused; nor does every incident need to be taken to the criminal level. In this particular one, she called out 41, he owned up to it, and he apologized. Kudos to him. Done.

I see Redwingtoms...baby tiger cub has arrived.

Pathetic. A sexual assault should be an actual sexual ASSAULT. But thank you for sharing...

....coming from the guy who blamed ISIS for Las Vegas, and now has moved on to the next conspiracy theory of a MGM coverup. Okay.

A sexual assault IS a sexual assault - you guys just don't want to believe that it can involve more possibilities than rape or physical injury, OR that things like this happen way more than you care to admit, even though yes; some false stories do come out of it.

Again, that's 100% on you. No one has watered down anything; you just choose to ignore it, or paint all these women with the same broad brush.

read the thread tiger cub... there is a cover up of the mass shooting in Vegas...

a sexual assault needs to include an actual assault.. otherwise... try to follow me follow me here cub... it is not an "assault"

You can drop the cutesy name-calling. Your Vegas thread is hilarious. I've never seen so many conspiracy theories thrown out in one place. When the ISIS one didn't stick, you moved on to a supposed MGM coverup.

Can it be a conspiracy if no answers are provided and no questions allowed to begin with?