(10-31-2017 10:12 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 06:58 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://thehill.com/homenews/administrati...esidential

Thinks any other Republican beats Clinton easily and Sanders beats Trump.

IDK.... I think Sanders destroys Trump but I don't think that Clinton loses to jeb "please clap" bush.

This would never happen. There's not enough Millennials to swing their votes to the WH. Bernie is a bona-fide Socialist/Communist and no matter what the *****-hatters think this country likes/loves to keep their paychecks and not be given to the worthless decrepit members of the government.

That was funny though. Thanks.

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 10:12 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  I think Sanders destroys Trump

This would never happen. There's not enough Millennials to swing their votes to the WH. Bernie is a bona-fide Socialist/Communist and no matter what the *****-hatters think this country likes/loves to keep their paychecks and not be given to the worthless decrepit members of the government.

True, but would the voters have known that? Would the media have told them?

(10-31-2017 06:58 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://thehill.com/homenews/administrati...esidential

Thinks any other Republican beats Clinton easily and Sanders beats Trump.

Not horn tooting here,

But I said almost this exact thing 6 months or more.

Pretty amazing cycle really.

Sanders would have been a better candidate in the Rust Belt than Hillary. NAFTA killed her in the region.

(10-31-2017 05:12 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Sanders would have been a better candidate in the Rust Belt than Hillary. NAFTA killed her in the region.

You may be correct, but I have to believe too many regular folks would have figured out that all the free stuff he was touting could never have been paid for without massive tax increases on everybody.......if they figured that out - no way he wins.

With that said, I've never claimed the American electorate was smart - or informed for that matter. Who knows.

What I do know for a fact is Hillary and the DNC rigged it so Sanders had no chance.

I've always wondered why the Democrats aren't more p!ssed about that instead of all their vitriol at everything on the right.

Your own party screwed you and......almost silence.......

(10-31-2017 05:12 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Sanders would have been a better candidate in the Rust Belt than Hillary. NAFTA killed her in the region.

Bragging about throwing coal miners out of work is what really killed her.

(10-31-2017 06:03 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:12 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Sanders would have been a better candidate in the Rust Belt than Hillary. NAFTA killed her in the region.

Bragging about throwing coal miners out of work is what really killed her.

It didn’t help

Sanders vs. Trump would have been fun. "Burn it down" vs. "Burn it down, comrade"

Sanders would have curb stomped Trump. Still might.

(10-31-2017 07:03 AM)miko33 Wrote:  It is surprising to me that the Dem party isn't in even greater turmoil than it already is. You would think that Hillary would be persona non grata among the Dem leadership after she botched her campaign plus the large blocks of support Bernie still gets in the party.

I’d say no bc it was the leadership that conspired to give her the nomination ahead of Bernie.

(10-31-2017 09:23 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Sanders would have curb stomped Trump. Still might.

Based on what?

Free schit with MMlians?

(10-31-2017 11:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 09:23 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Sanders would have curb stomped Trump. Still might.

Based on what?

Free schit with MMlians?

No because like Trump he was (1) anti establishment and (2) talking to disenfranchised working class voters.

Hillary surrendered Michigan, Wisconsin, and PA because she was the establishment person who didn't give a crap about the struggles of small town working class people. Sanders would have taken enough votes to win WI, MI, and prob PA.

(10-31-2017 10:03 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 09:38 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 07:19 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  I'm not so sure Sanders would have beat Trump, but it would have been a hell of a lot closer regardless which one won. IMO Cruz and Sanders were by far the best candidates from each primary, though it didn't take much to be a better candidate than Clinton.

It took far less to be a better candidate than Trump. These were the two worst candidates possible.

I see you're the newest deep thought thinker.....like the ones that tune in to madd©ow disease

Trump hopped on the right movement but he is the wrong man to lead it.

there's an oxymoron....so you think the status quo would've been the answer???


It is a wasted election.

yeah, the market has confidence with a 25% gain to date, GDP is up and gaining on 4%, conservative judges are being appointed, tax reform on the horizon, more people working.....did you sleep with the stupid pillow and simply decide to wake up to more stupid (rhetorical)

oh yeah, NO HILL-LAIR-LIAR

We had 2 bigger crooks than Nixon going at it with both facing impeachment movements before Election Day. This was the one election that we needed to elect a third party candidate.

he was....or did that fly over your head....and tell me, how in the **** would an (I) have won when the (D) has a GUARANTEED 40% base.....that's just retarded to argue....it continually amazes me why so many don't understand why DJT ran as ®


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've inherited dum dum land...

Did I throw any insults? Who's sleeping with the "stupid pillow"?

Trump hopped on the right movement but he is the wrong man to lead it.

there's an oxymoron....so you think the status quo would've been the answer???


What part of that didn't you understand? The angst of the Trump supporters & the call for change was the right movement but were given an immature & crooked individual to lead it. That's not an oxymoron just an unfortunate reality.

For the record I didn't support either candidate & voted for 3rd party so where did I say that Clinton would have been better?

I concur with your points on the economy but we haven't even finished year 1 yet, how much of that is being driven by hope of change & how much will still be true a year from now? How is repelling O'Bama Care going? Has tax reform been passed yet? Trump is losing support from both parties.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk