(10-22-2017 08:07 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  One you won’t find me complaining about Benghazi. Mistakes happen. Two I’m pointing out the right politicized the loss of four lives in Africa. The hypocrisy is the silence on this now.

But I get it. The vast majority of you are brain washed and you’re left with defending the indefensible. Not an easy place to be.

Shut up and eat your peas. Take your medicine.

Mach, who sent those troops to Niger??

You comparing these soldiers getting killed to the Benghazi mess is laughable. Not comparable in the least.


......oh yeah, go check my posting history on Benghazi and you won't find much, so spare me your faux hypocrisy diatribe.

(10-21-2017 07:24 PM)MJG Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 07:21 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Sure Trump is a liar...and...If I like my insurance?...I can keep it.

Trumps promise to repeal and replace.
Better cheaper insurance for everyone.
Hold Trump to the same standards.
The failed attempts so far have not come close to Trump' s promise.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

That's not Trumps fault, you can blame a handful of RINO's for that.

(10-21-2017 09:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Biggest one? A foreseeable effect of aimless African intervention.

That Obama started.

(10-21-2017 09:16 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here’s where you guys lose credibility. We need to go back thorough the endless Benghazi threads you yahoots indulged in month after month. Use your arguments. That you are silent now makes you a hypocrite. If you were Johnny Loud mouth for Benghazi and quiet as a church mouse now that makes you a partisan hypocrite. I am not a hypocrite because I didn’t ***** about Benghazi. I’m bitching about those that bitched about Benghazi yet are silent now. That makes me an honest arbitrator.

Apples to oranges. The only way the two events are remotely alike is that someone died.

Oh the irony. A leftist whining about anothers credibility is just too rich.

Tiger Blue......

Triggered. 4 posts in a row.......

That tops me even. Don’t think I’ve ever had 4.

(10-21-2017 09:16 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  That makes me an honest arbitrator.

In your mind. Nowhere else.

Nothing better after a long weekend at the hunt club than coming in here and getting lectured about credibility by the one poster on here who has ZERO credibility. This time a year ago this same poster was mocking conservatives who felt that Trump would win and assuring us of a Hillary victory. This time six months ago he was assuring us, based solely on the Twitter ramblings of some whack-job who claimed insider information, that impeachment was imminent.

Dunno about anybody else but the last person I want to hear preaching about credibility is someone who totally lacks an ounce of it.

(10-22-2017 08:40 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-21-2017 09:16 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here’s where you guys lose credibility. We need to go back thorough the endless Benghazi threads you yahoots indulged in month after month. Use your arguments. That you are silent now makes you a hypocrite. If you were Johnny Loud mouth for Benghazi and quiet as a church mouse now that makes you a partisan hypocrite. I am not a hypocrite because I didn’t ***** about Benghazi. I’m bitching about those that bitched about Benghazi yet are silent now. That makes me an honest arbitrator.

Apples to oranges. The only way the two events are remotely alike is that someone died.

And that the number killed coincidentally was four. If this were a routine foot patrol in Dumfukistan and the number killed were say, seven, the leftists never would have been clevah enough to put 2 and 2 together to make their baseless comparisons like here.

Wait. Wut? It was FOUR?!?

Well, then, that's EXACTLY like our civilian ambassador and detail being overrun by Al Qaeda on US soil!!! Four is the same number as FOUR!
How can you not see that?!? Scraaaaawk!!!

Mind numbing blather.

Lets talk credibility. Mach posted endless posts before the election how all of those that would even pretend to believe Trump could win were beyond idiots and fools. He paraded his egotistical and I might add imaginary, belief that he was intellectually superior to those supporting Trump. I would bring those posts back up, but we have been told not to do that. He is without a doubt the least credible poster on this board and that is what is so ironic about him attacking Trump supporters credibility. Mach, you have zero credibility. In your twisted narcissism you will never see that.

(10-22-2017 12:45 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Lets talk credibility. Mach posted endless posts before the election how all of those that would even pretend to believe he could win were beyond idiots and fools. He paraded his egotistical and I might add imaginary, belief that he was intellectually superior to those supporting Trump. I would bring those posts back up, but we have been told not to do that. He is without a doubt the least credible poster on this board and that is what is so ironic about him attacking Trump supporters credibility. Mach, you have zero credibility. In your twisted narcissism you will never see that.

"Rubes".


Pretty sure the operative word was... rubes.

I could go look, but as you say, that has been frowned upon for threatening their gentle sensibilities.

It's always fun to see Mach get tossed around like a kitten.

But the irony is absolutely outstanding. This is the new Benghazi. Well, doesn't that mean that the word Benghazi is tied to an abdication of leadership?

If it is the "new Benghazi" are you now admitting that the old Benghazi occurred because of an abdication of leadership?

This is sort of fun, when the defenders of the leadership of the actual Benghazi try to label something a "new Benghazi" and identify it as synonymous with an abdication of leadership while denying that the old Benghazi was the result of an abdication of leadership.

Its funny how Mach is so couaght up in the fake news construct that he has no idea how blind he is to the truth. Closing in on a year and half of investigations on the "Russian Collusion" case---still no evidence. No we find hidden documents on the Clinton Tarmac meeting that curtailed the Hillary investigation. We find rough drafts of Comey's speech exonerating Hillary months before any key witnesses were interviewed, and now---we know a full scale collusion with payoffs was discovered by the FBI (with ACTUAL EVIDENCE---how novel) but was covered up and hushed by the Obama administration. He just cant see through the fake news curtain. In his world, we are just days away from Congress voting for articles of impeachment.

(10-21-2017 04:01 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why don’t both of you STFU...... free country.........



Actually I don’t give a crap. This Trump is the biggest of biggest of con artist frauds. He’s done it it in all parts of his life. He single handidly destroyed the USFL. Conned thousands in the Trump University scandal. Guys made billions laundering Russian mob money. Yet he’s team R so the team Rethuglicans are going to THUG.

OK. Got it. Thanks.

Now, could you make a list of the lies/scams committed by the Clintons?

And if you can't make a list please explain why.

Is it because you don't know of any lies or scams they perpetrated?
Is it because you don't have the integrity to do so?
Or is it for some other reason? If so, what is that reason?

Wait...... I did find a major difference between the two incidences that pretty much guarantees you guys will ignore it.......

Ready.......

Wait for it..........

Benghazi happened under a Democratic administration and this one Russian err I mean Republican leadership.......

(10-22-2017 05:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wait...... I did find a major difference between the two incidences that pretty much guarantees you guys will ignore it.......

Ready.......

Wait for it..........

Benghazi happened under a Democratic administration and this one Russian err I mean Republican leadership.......

Is weed legal in your state?

(10-22-2017 05:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wait...... I did find a major difference between the two incidences that pretty much guarantees you guys will ignore it.......

Ready.......

Wait for it..........

Benghazi happened under a Democratic administration and this one Russian err I mean Republican leadership.......

Hey, I see your post was almost 2 hours after mine. Did you happen to see it?

You guys have to admit that WAS funny...... the Russian bit..... that’s creativity rubes....... lol

Listen. If I’m not saying it, where would you guys get it? You know damn well Fox News isn’t reporting on it. Did any of you even know about Niger before I posted it? I’m like a missionary at this point. Going into a foreign land where people want to burn me at the stake. I only have the truth and the light on my side. That’s good enough. Now back off with the “STFU” commentary you unwashed heathens.

(10-22-2017 05:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wait...... I did find a major difference between the two incidences that pretty much guarantees you guys will ignore it.......

Ready.......

Wait for it..........

Benghazi happened under a Democratic administration and this one Russian err I mean Republican leadership.......

Hey, I see your post was almost 2 hours after mine. Did you happen to see it?

The difference I'm seeing is Mattis is finding out what's happening and not blaming a YouTube video.