RUSSIAN URANIUM INVESTIGATION: BILL CLINTON MET PUTIN AFTER ASKING TO MEET TOP NUCLEAR INDUSTRY OFFICIAL, EMAILS SHOW
http://www.newsweek.com/clinton-russia-u...9321?amp=1

When planning a trip to Moscow for a speaking engagement in June 2010, former President Bill Clinton reportedly tried to meet with an official who was part of a Russian state-run company seeking approval to purchase a uranium company with holdings in the United States. Instead, Clinton ended up meeting Vladimir Putin.

Bill Clinton’s Moscow speech in June 2010 was delivered at a Russian bank, Renaissance Capital, that reportedly was encouraging people to purchase shares of Uranium One and had links to the Kremlin, and the State Department was one of the many government bodies involved in approving the deal.

newsweek is one of them alt right news outlets. cant trust a thing they say

Libs, here is your Russian bribery story. Slick Willie also sold classified military intel to the Chinese when he was President. Are you still with her?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/20/hillar...t-stories/

Another good read on it. Clinton pushed to send the captured Russian agents back, for good reason, she was the primary target. Good discussion on how the operatives worked. Anna Chapman, who was the public face of the agents at the time, wasn't the most important one. Lidiya Guryeva was targeting Clinton as: "...She was a known quantity: predictable, vain and ruthless, and with an insatiable desire for cash to enrich her family, friends, and political machine. Blindly ambitious to become president of the world’s only superpower and swearing to come back after losing in 2008 to Barack Obama, she was the 21st century KGB’s perfect mark...."

"...So here are the key facts: The FBI found that Russian intelligence had targeted Hillary Clinton before and during her time as secretary of state. Clinton’s spokespersons denied that this was so. Clinton opposed the Magnitsky sanctions on officials tied to Putin. After her husband received a half-million dollars in Moscow from a Kremlin-connected investment bank, Clinton moved with unusual speed to whisk the ring of 10 Russian spies out of the country and back to Moscow. She had the lopsided swap take place over a long summer weekend, before the FBI was finished with the spies, and before the spies could stand trial. While the FBI was separately investigating Russians involved with buying Uranium One, she approved the sale of American uranium to Russia’s nuclear weapons agency. Principals in the sale then plowed $145 million into her family foundation and projects.
Several questions come to mind. Precisely what did the FBI know about Russia’s spy service targeting Hillary Clinton and her inner circle? Why did Clinton deny through spokespersons that she had been a Russian target? Why did she work so feverishly to get the spies out of the United States and back to Russia? Why has the FBI leadership not been more vocal in touting one of its greatest counterintelligence successes ever? And why did nobody in the FBI leadership raise this issue during the 2016 Russian election meddling controversy?"

Where's the resident poster that's been screaming about Russian collusion and dossiers at? Oh this is the wrong candidate. Didn't he have a thread about Trumpbots and them not believing anything he did was wrong? The hypocrisy is strong with that one.

(10-21-2017 07:38 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/20/hillar...t-stories/

Another good read on it. Clinton pushed to send the captured Russian agents back, for good reason, she was the primary target. Good discussion on how the operatives worked. Anna Chapman, who was the public face of the agents at the time, wasn't the most important one. Lidiya Guryeva was targeting Clinton as: "...She was a known quantity: predictable, vain and ruthless, and with an insatiable desire for cash to enrich her family, friends, and political machine. Blindly ambitious to become president of the world’s only superpower and swearing to come back after losing in 2008 to Barack Obama, she was the 21st century KGB’s perfect mark...."

"...So here are the key facts: The FBI found that Russian intelligence had targeted Hillary Clinton before and during her time as secretary of state. Clinton’s spokespersons denied that this was so. Clinton opposed the Magnitsky sanctions on officials tied to Putin. After her husband received a half-million dollars in Moscow from a Kremlin-connected investment bank, Clinton moved with unusual speed to whisk the ring of 10 Russian spies out of the country and back to Moscow. She had the lopsided swap take place over a long summer weekend, before the FBI was finished with the spies, and before the spies could stand trial. While the FBI was separately investigating Russians involved with buying Uranium One, she approved the sale of American uranium to Russia’s nuclear weapons agency. Principals in the sale then plowed $145 million into her family foundation and projects.
Several questions come to mind. Precisely what did the FBI know about Russia’s spy service targeting Hillary Clinton and her inner circle? Why did Clinton deny through spokespersons that she had been a Russian target? Why did she work so feverishly to get the spies out of the United States and back to Russia? Why has the FBI leadership not been more vocal in touting one of its greatest counterintelligence successes ever? And why did nobody in the FBI leadership raise this issue during the 2016 Russian election meddling controversy?"

That is treason. Lots of people need to be arrested.

Mollie Hemingway at the Federalist always gets to the crux of the matter.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/10/19/russ...narrative/

"...In any case, get your acts together, journalists. You can't push a Russian collusion narrative for a year and then go soft and silent just because it turns out Russians paid a shady opposition research firm that just happens to employ a bunch of your close friends...."

(10-21-2017 08:57 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Where's the resident poster that's been screaming about Russian collusion and dossiers at? Oh this is the wrong candidate. Didn't he have a thread about Trumpbots and them not believing anything he did was wrong? The hypocrisy is strong with that one.

crickets...

(10-21-2017 10:45 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-21-2017 07:38 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/20/hillar...t-stories/

Another good read on it. Clinton pushed to send the captured Russian agents back, for good reason, she was the primary target. Good discussion on how the operatives worked. Anna Chapman, who was the public face of the agents at the time, wasn't the most important one. Lidiya Guryeva was targeting Clinton as: "...She was a known quantity: predictable, vain and ruthless, and with an insatiable desire for cash to enrich her family, friends, and political machine. Blindly ambitious to become president of the world’s only superpower and swearing to come back after losing in 2008 to Barack Obama, she was the 21st century KGB’s perfect mark...."

"...So here are the key facts: The FBI found that Russian intelligence had targeted Hillary Clinton before and during her time as secretary of state. Clinton’s spokespersons denied that this was so. Clinton opposed the Magnitsky sanctions on officials tied to Putin. After her husband received a half-million dollars in Moscow from a Kremlin-connected investment bank, Clinton moved with unusual speed to whisk the ring of 10 Russian spies out of the country and back to Moscow. She had the lopsided swap take place over a long summer weekend, before the FBI was finished with the spies, and before the spies could stand trial. While the FBI was separately investigating Russians involved with buying Uranium One, she approved the sale of American uranium to Russia’s nuclear weapons agency. Principals in the sale then plowed $145 million into her family foundation and projects.
Several questions come to mind. Precisely what did the FBI know about Russia’s spy service targeting Hillary Clinton and her inner circle? Why did Clinton deny through spokespersons that she had been a Russian target? Why did she work so feverishly to get the spies out of the United States and back to Russia? Why has the FBI leadership not been more vocal in touting one of its greatest counterintelligence successes ever? And why did nobody in the FBI leadership raise this issue during the 2016 Russian election meddling controversy?"

That is treason. Lots of people need to be arrested.

You misspelled "hung".

(10-22-2017 01:10 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-21-2017 10:45 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-21-2017 07:38 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/20/hillar...t-stories/

Another good read on it. Clinton pushed to send the captured Russian agents back, for good reason, she was the primary target. Good discussion on how the operatives worked. Anna Chapman, who was the public face of the agents at the time, wasn't the most important one. Lidiya Guryeva was targeting Clinton as: "...She was a known quantity: predictable, vain and ruthless, and with an insatiable desire for cash to enrich her family, friends, and political machine. Blindly ambitious to become president of the world’s only superpower and swearing to come back after losing in 2008 to Barack Obama, she was the 21st century KGB’s perfect mark...."

"...So here are the key facts: The FBI found that Russian intelligence had targeted Hillary Clinton before and during her time as secretary of state. Clinton’s spokespersons denied that this was so. Clinton opposed the Magnitsky sanctions on officials tied to Putin. After her husband received a half-million dollars in Moscow from a Kremlin-connected investment bank, Clinton moved with unusual speed to whisk the ring of 10 Russian spies out of the country and back to Moscow. She had the lopsided swap take place over a long summer weekend, before the FBI was finished with the spies, and before the spies could stand trial. While the FBI was separately investigating Russians involved with buying Uranium One, she approved the sale of American uranium to Russia’s nuclear weapons agency. Principals in the sale then plowed $145 million into her family foundation and projects.
Several questions come to mind. Precisely what did the FBI know about Russia’s spy service targeting Hillary Clinton and her inner circle? Why did Clinton deny through spokespersons that she had been a Russian target? Why did she work so feverishly to get the spies out of the United States and back to Russia? Why has the FBI leadership not been more vocal in touting one of its greatest counterintelligence successes ever? And why did nobody in the FBI leadership raise this issue during the 2016 Russian election meddling controversy?"

That is treason. Lots of people need to be arrested.

You misspelled "hung".

she might have a bigger one than ol' willie.....

there's no questioning the biatch has balls....

(10-17-2017 03:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Mueller will be fired on Friday.

Nah, some clerk in the accounting office will be slaughtered for this.

(10-18-2017 03:05 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  Suddenly, no one has a problem believing that Russians have been meddling in US affairs. When it was against Trump, everyone here was saying it was fake news, hogwash and nothing to it.

It doesn't matter who the target is. Trump, Clinton or Obama. There just needs to be a stop to it.

This isn't election meddling. This is collusion between our top officials and theirs to give them control over a large percentage of our uranium while enriching the bank accounts of our top officials. There's a difference.

Where are all the leftists on this?

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Well when there's a story and proof of their heroes doing wrong they bury their heads in the sand.

But wait they'll figure out a way to turn that phrase around on us.

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Waiting for talking points.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(10-24-2017 08:03 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-18-2017 03:05 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  Suddenly, no one has a problem believing that Russians have been meddling in US affairs. When it was against Trump, everyone here was saying it was fake news, hogwash and nothing to it.

It doesn't matter who the target is. Trump, Clinton or Obama. There just needs to be a stop to it.

This isn't election meddling. This is collusion between our top officials and theirs to give them control over a large percentage of our uranium while enriching the bank accounts of our top officials. There's a difference.

And there's apparently quite a paper trail.

(10-24-2017 07:33 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Waiting for talking points.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Then they will all come out at once. Amazing how that works. Across multiple boards on multiple platforms, they all seem to say the same thing at about the same time.

(10-24-2017 08:00 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 07:33 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Waiting for talking points.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Then they will all come out at once. Amazing how that works. Across multiple boards on multiple platforms, they all seem to say the same thing at about the same time.

i wonder how long it will take before they turn on Hillary. its coming

(10-24-2017 08:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 08:00 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 07:33 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Waiting for talking points.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Then they will all come out at once. Amazing how that works. Across multiple boards on multiple platforms, they all seem to say the same thing at about the same time.

i wonder how long it will take before they turn on Hillary. its coming

you can smell it.....

(10-24-2017 07:33 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-24-2017 08:13 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Where are all the leftists on this?

Waiting for talking points.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

there's no way dems participate....

the initial reports are damning.....

how would you like to be in chelsea's skin right now???