SBC well represented . . .

https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...cumstance/

I could only think of one other team more deserving of the current #1 worst team in FBS per this ranking.

Like I said last year, this ain't the real Bottom ranking. ESPN Bottom 10 is the real deal. This one is pretty lame.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

I like how it says it will be hard for us to win again since we've won a game already. We won two last year and still ended up the worst team.

(09-12-2017 02:08 PM)slycat Wrote:  I like how it says it will be hard for us to win again since we've won a game already. We won two last year and still ended up the worst team.

We were unranked...did not play...and entered the list. Makes a lot of sense.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Well GS fans are at the cross roads of pulling for the team but wanting the band aid ripped off sooner rather than later. A beat down by ArkSt on national TV might be the tipping point. I think if CTS is going to get fired this year it will be once we lose 7 games and cant go to a bowl. If he is not fired by 7 losses I got a bad feeling he is here for 2018....

We are number 2!!! Maybe with a loss this week we can be #1...

ESPN Bottom 10 for Comparison:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ma-sooners

(09-13-2017 08:55 AM)timber Wrote:  ESPN Bottom 10 for Comparison:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ma-sooners

ECU #1 on both lists. Both seem fairly accurate to me.

(09-13-2017 09:05 AM)APPrising Wrote:  

(09-13-2017 08:55 AM)timber Wrote:  ESPN Bottom 10 for Comparison:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/sto...ma-sooners

ECU #1 on both lists. Both seem fairly accurate to me.

Problem with the Bottom 25 is that the guy literally runs out of teams at some point and just starts googling winless College Football teams, and throws them in there without even thinking of why

Bottom 10 generally just likes to make fun of the F_U's and the GS(U)'s and take pot shots at P5's who stink as well.

You are right though, ECYew is clearly the worst team in the country. Maybe UMass will pass them at some point, but right now, there is no doubt.

I wouldn't say ESPN's bottom 10 is the "real deal" although it does have a higher portion of reality. Listing Ohio State at #5 is clearly not "real." They both enjoy jumping on winning programs when they lose ugly (or lose at all....see stAte).

(09-13-2017 09:57 AM)Yosef84 Wrote:  I wouldn't say ESPN's bottom 10 is the "real deal" although it does have a higher portion of reality. Listing Ohio State at #5 is clearly not "real." They both enjoy jumping on winning programs when they lose ugly (or lose at all....see stAte).

Yes, but the Bottom 10 openly admits the "Coveted 5 spot" is reserved for P5 schools that take a really bad loss. They know that spot isn't real

As well it feels like the ESPN one has a lot of knowledge about each school he puts on there with a lot of energy and jokes, whereas the t25 felt like the writer is tired of making the list

Sent from my LGLS992 using CSNbbs mobile app

He has a sense of humor...which CBS does not.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

(09-12-2017 02:00 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  Like I said last year, this ain't the real Bottom ranking. ESPN Bottom 10 is the real deal. This one is pretty lame.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Arkansas State could likely beat Rutgers by 3 TD's. I find that interesting. Sadly, ECU is as bad as advertised; WVU could've scored 100 on them if they wanted. Tickets to the Virginia Tech game are actually being sold as 50% off and I still wouldn't expect a sell out which is a first that I know of when a P5 is visiting. Scottie Montgomery and Tyson Summers are two coaches that are as good as gone during or after the season ends; or they should be. Two respectable programs run into the doldrums of FCS losses and loss of fan support, which equates to loss of revenue.