(07-27-2017 04:55 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-27-2017 04:34 PM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  

(07-27-2017 04:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(07-27-2017 04:13 PM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  

(07-27-2017 03:58 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  A loud mouth racist and a Mean Green fan. lol...I cant believe a N Texas fan has the balls to dog ANYBODYS win loss record...No wonder you dont list your school.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-752483.html

you are not even intelligent enough to understand what you were reading there

north Texas state got throttled by a D1-AA team

but like a dem coogs doh fan you believe that a fan of a program would actually brag about playing a "nationally ranked" D1-AA program

sort of like bragging about winning a conference with a 7-5 record with only one win out of the 7 over a program that had a winning record......and trying to call that program a 'legit top 25 team" even though they finished the season unranked

Im smart of enough to see your basically talking to yourself for virtually the entire thread. Now piss off and go back to cutting holes in sheets. Tired of your racism.

yes that is why multiple dem coogs doh fans have quoted my post and replied to them.....because "I am talking to myself"

what you should actually figure out is that the CUSA being called the SWC was still going to be the CUSA

ans what you should be intelligent enough to figure out is that this thread (in your feeble mind) became "about dem coogs doh" because only dem coogs doh fans sit around believing that a name on the conference is enough to overcome poor facilities, poor fan support, losing records and a terrible administration

you do not see anyone from Rice, SMU or especially TCU in here pretending that their program would have flourished in the CUSA had been called the SWC

and that is because rice fans have brains, intelligence and reason, SMU fans understand that their administration gave up on athletics after the death penalty and until the hiring of June Jones and TCU fans understand that programs make a conference a conference does not make programs and that is it not the job of Texas and Texas A&M to hold their hand and watch out for them

and TCU fans also understood the time for action was a decade and a half ago not several years after major realignment

stupid P6 branding campaigns, thinking the CUSA with the SWC name, pretending a season or two is equal to a prolonged record of success and trying to overstate the relevance of a bowl win and talking about what might have been or what could have happened if only is just ignoring REALITY and pretending that history has not already been written

Texas Tech and Baylor did what was needed to keep their programs in major conferences, Texas and Texas A&M look out for their programs as they should, TCU made meaningful changes and had LONG TERM SUCCESS and they did so WELL BEFORE the time to make a move was available to them

dem coogs doh talk about what if, pretend that the SWC was not a dead brand, cry that other programs do not hold their hand or look out for them and try and massively overstate their very spotty record of achievement all while crying conspiracy and unfair and ignoring their own fans, donors, alumni and administrations lack of action and involvement

the fact that some call BS on that and point out the failures of that argument does not mean they are after "dem coogs doh" it just means they do not buy into the BS

the CUSA with any other name including the SWC was still the CUSA and it would not have been in the BCS nor would it have had a major TV deal or a bunch of successful programs......because it was made up of programs that were mostly doing everything they could do to not have success or that were looking to GTFO as soon as they had any success and being called the SWC would not have changed that.....just like programs would GTFO the AAC right now if they could.....but they can't because they are not bringing the value which is why they are not getting the call

Didnt read another of your racist rants beyond the first sentence. Your too stupid to know Im referring to the thread reference in the post I responded to. Now, you can go back to admiring skin head tatoos.

why would I or anyone else give any consideration to that thread at all

1. you clearly had no clue what that thread was for or about

2. that thread has nothing to do with this thread

3. you bringing that thread over to this thread was another failed attempt by you to attack the messenger when you failed to refute the actual message and after you failed at doing that there was no need to give further thought or consideration to that thread that you totally took out of context in a failed attempt to distract from your own failed points in this thread

no one of intelligence or reason sees it as a persuasive argument when you try and go off and find out "who I am a fan of" or "what my agenda is" they just see someone that has failed at making the point they thought they would make and instead of supporting their argument they tried to attack the messenger

I made a statement about the SWC and the fact that no one was going to rebuild around 4 terrible programs and keep the SWC name when that name represented nothing about what the conference used to be

the next response to that was from some dunce that immediately took that as a shot at dem coogs doh specifically......and that is because of what I have pointed out that dem coogs doh are obsessed with trying to convince others and themselves that their program sucked for an extended period or time and was left behind not because of their own terrible fan. donor, alumni support and administration, but instead because of the name of the conference or because of UT UT UT or A&M or because Tech and Baylor had fans and alumni that did what it took to keep their program in a good conference

who I am, who I am a fan of or anything else about me personally will never change that fact and neither would the name of the conference with all the schools that were in CUSA