(07-27-2017 06:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Trollolo

You throw out your wild guess, I throw out mine in opposition of yours, and you call me a troll. Got it

(07-27-2017 12:17 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  "Would" in post subject line. "Could" in actual article.

99.999% not the same word.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Leave it to the left leaning Politico to CHANGE the words that Graham actually said and they quoted in the article and put it in their title.

Quote:“Any effort to go after Mueller could be the beginning of the end of the Trump presidency unless Mueller did something wrong,” Graham told reporters on Capitol Hill, where he outlined plans to introduce legislation next week that would move to block any Trump attempts to fire Mueller.

Just like his buddy McLame, Lindsey is usually wrong on many issues. I see his prognostication skills about as strong as a poster around these parts who fancied himself an election predictor.

(07-27-2017 11:52 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  http://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/27...ler-241027

Quote:Sen. Lindsey Graham sent a sharp warning Thursday to President Donald Trump that it “could be the beginning of the end” of his presidency if he makes moves to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.

The South Carolina Republican, who in the late 1990s served as a House impeachment manager against President Bill Clinton, said Trump would be crossing a serious “red line” by ordering the ouster of the lead investigator who is probing his campaign’s ties to Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

“Any effort to go after Mueller could be the beginning of the end of the Trump presidency unless Mueller did something wrong,” Graham told reporters on Capitol Hill, where he outlined plans to introduce legislation next week that would move to block any Trump attempts to fire Mueller.

Here is where I think Graham is just plain wrong. We never needed a special prosecutor in the first place. But, now that we have one--fine---let him investigate the RUSIIAN INTERFERENCE INTO THE 2016 ELECTION. Trump's financial records from nearly a decade before has ZERO to do with an election in 2016. If he cant find enough to investigate in the 2016 election---then shut it down and proclaim the matter closed. The election was over in early Nov of 2016. Russian involvment has been investigated for over a year. All the evidence there is to get on a year old election is already in thier hands---including a crap load of illegally unmasked stuuf that Obama never thought anyone would know about.

If a hostile Obama administration, illegally using the US Intelligence agencies to to gather information, couldnt find a crime---then there certainly is no reason a through review by the current special investigtion cannot be concluded in a relatively reasonable time frame of a few months. I'd have Sessions put a time limit when the report is due and grant any requests for manpower needed to meet that timetable from the Investigation team.

(07-27-2017 12:27 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  I have lost count of the 'beginnings of the ends.' Anyone got a rough number?

They'll get him this time. It is finally the time. Firing Mueller is the red line.

Dumbshitez

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk