2nd link. You could sue a ham sandwich. Unbelieavable. Do I need to go on. Find me ONE link that says what you claim. Not an opinion piece or a story about someone suing because of it. I'll drop out one more if it's shyt I'm not wasting anymore time.

Ok third one. A part of it is unverified. One part. That doesn't make it false. How are you guys this gullible? How can you guys keep spitting out the dossier is fake? A part unverified IS NOT fake. Wake up sheeple or provide proof of your claims.

(07-14-2017 12:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Holy Moly Ever. You do know the difference between an opinion article and actual news. Right? Your first link. It's right on top in little black letters. OPINION!!!

There is no longer any discernible difference between news and opinion. The journalistic ideal of unbiased news has withered these last few years. Virtually every news report is burdened with opinion.

As I've posted before, news reports on the same event in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, can read like they are referring to totally different events. Regarding Trump's speech in Poland, the left leaning media reported the speech as a disaster, while the right described it as a triumph.

So the thoughtful news consumer will understand that the source they choose will provide the spin they wish to hear. It's called confirmation bias.

(07-14-2017 12:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ok third one. A part of it is unverified. One part. That doesn't make it false. How are you guys this gullible? How can you guys keep spitting out the dossier is fake? A part unverified IS NOT fake. Wake up sheeple or provide proof of your claims.

YOU are calling others gullible!!! Nobody believes the Steele dossier is anything but garbage except perhaps you. Parts of it were clearly impossible. And guess what--It came from Russian sources!!!! So who was PAYING a Brit to PAY Russians to get garbage on the opposition--yes, Hillary's campaign.

(07-14-2017 01:29 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-14-2017 12:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ok third one. A part of it is unverified. One part. That doesn't make it false. How are you guys this gullible? How can you guys keep spitting out the dossier is fake? A part unverified IS NOT fake. Wake up sheeple or provide proof of your claims.

YOU are calling others gullible!!! Nobody believes the Steele dossier is anything but garbage except perhaps you. Parts of it were clearly impossible. And guess what--It came from Russian sources!!!! So who was PAYING a Brit to PAY Russians to get garbage on the opposition--yes, Hillary's campaign.

Isn't it true that even Steele himself either "has doubts" or "disavowed" (There's that word again...) the silly thing himself?

Wanted no more to do with any of it, even AFTER our own FBI agreed to continue to pay him?

(Why on earth that would be necessary or even possible has always baffled me. Our own FBI needs to be out there hiring mercenaries as "reporters" and doing the digging around? What the heck is the FBI doing?).

(07-14-2017 08:54 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(07-14-2017 08:03 AM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  2 more guys in the room.

It was a room full of...THE RUSSIANS!

"I promise, that is the whole story".

Read the BBC article boys........

(07-14-2017 07:01 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Read the BBC article boys........

Librul media.

Should we buckle up again?

(07-14-2017 11:16 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  With this thread title, we get cb4029 bringing up his sex life again.

(07-14-2017 07:24 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russ...am-n782851

Quote:WASHINGTON — The Russian lawyer who met with the Trump team after a promise of compromising material on Hillary Clinton was accompanied by a Russian-American lobbyist — a former Soviet counter intelligence officer who is suspected by some U.S. officials of having ongoing ties to Russian intelligence, NBC News has learned.

Like I was saying, the media is setting the traps and these dummies keep lying right into them. This type of stupidity is predictable. The next story will be about the meeting lasting two hours and not the twenty minutes they claim. This is getting good. "I love it".

None of which means anything.

Disagree? Fine. What does it prove?

(07-17-2017 09:00 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-14-2017 07:24 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russ...am-n782851

Quote:WASHINGTON — The Russian lawyer who met with the Trump team after a promise of compromising material on Hillary Clinton was accompanied by a Russian-American lobbyist — a former Soviet counter intelligence officer who is suspected by some U.S. officials of having ongoing ties to Russian intelligence, NBC News has learned.

Like I was saying, the media is setting the traps and these dummies keep lying right into them. This type of stupidity is predictable. The next story will be about the meeting lasting two hours and not the twenty minutes they claim. This is getting good. "I love it".

None of which means anything.

Disagree? Fine. What does it prove?

That they can't tell the truth.

There were more people in that room than attended the inauguration.