(06-19-2017 11:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:35 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:21 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 08:39 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I watched last night. She did a great job of letting him explain who he is. I can't understand how anyone would come away from this interview believing it was good for Alex Jones, but then, I can't understand would believe a damn thing he spews.

To me he basically called himself a tabloid shock jock. I can see how some people could find him entertaining but no one should act on his "reports". There's a reason why tabloids sell.

That's what I saw.

He does not hold himself accountable for the proven misinformation he purposefully disseminates, but seemingly seeks credibility. He doesn't source his own material and has a team that scourers the internet looking for material to put in front of him. How anyone could look to this guy for news is beyond me.

Sounds like the MSM.

Not really. Jones can consistently be wrong yet he suffers zero fallout. The MSM has to be right 100% of the time and they pay dearly when they aren't. Republicans have consistently played the MSM victim, which gave rise to talk radio, Fox News, and now to the loony conspiratorial websites like Infowars... each time going further down the rabbit hole.

(06-19-2017 12:03 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 11:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:35 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:21 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 08:39 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I watched last night. She did a great job of letting him explain who he is. I can't understand how anyone would come away from this interview believing it was good for Alex Jones, but then, I can't understand would believe a damn thing he spews.

To me he basically called himself a tabloid shock jock. I can see how some people could find him entertaining but no one should act on his "reports". There's a reason why tabloids sell.

That's what I saw.

He does not hold himself accountable for the proven misinformation he purposefully disseminates, but seemingly seeks credibility. He doesn't source his own material and has a team that scourers the internet looking for material to put in front of him. How anyone could look to this guy for news is beyond me.

Sounds like the MSM.

Not really. Jones can consistently be wrong yet he suffers zero fallout. The MSM has to be right 100% of the time and they pay dearly when they aren't. Republicans have consistently played the MSM victim, which gave rise to talk radio, Fox News, and now to the loony conspiratorial websites like Infowars... each time going further down the rabbit hole.

Who "pays dearly" and with what?

The MSM has to be 100% right? bahahahahahaha

They've been pushing a conspiracy theory for a year with zero evidence. At least Alex Jones admits when he's wrong or can't prove something.

(06-19-2017 12:14 PM)Kronke Wrote:  The MSM has to be 100% right? bahahahahahaha

They've been pushing a conspiracy theory for a year with zero evidence. At least Alex Jones admits when he's wrong or can't prove something.

I didn't say they were right 100% of the time... clearly they aren't. Yet, each time they aren't, people peel off to the fringe; which is costly to them, and to those who try and report the news and not tote the water of a political party.

I didn't hear Alex Jones admit anything... even when he was proven wrong in a court of law. Alex Jones is an opportunist of the worst kind. Its sad people see validity in any of the tripe he peddles.

(06-19-2017 12:03 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 11:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:35 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:21 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 08:39 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I watched last night. She did a great job of letting him explain who he is. I can't understand how anyone would come away from this interview believing it was good for Alex Jones, but then, I can't understand would believe a damn thing he spews.

To me he basically called himself a tabloid shock jock. I can see how some people could find him entertaining but no one should act on his "reports". There's a reason why tabloids sell.

That's what I saw.

He does not hold himself accountable for the proven misinformation he purposefully disseminates, but seemingly seeks credibility. He doesn't source his own material and has a team that scourers the internet looking for material to put in front of him. How anyone could look to this guy for news is beyond me.

Sounds like the MSM.

Not really. Jones can consistently be wrong yet he suffers zero fallout. The MSM has to be right 100% of the time and they pay dearly when they aren't. Republicans have consistently played the MSM victim, which gave rise to talk radio, Fox News, and now to the loony conspiratorial websites like Infowars... each time going further down the rabbit hole.

The MSM is well below the Mendoza Line when it comes to their being right. I don't see them paying at all for the current coup attempt they are leading.

(06-19-2017 01:28 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 12:03 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 11:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:35 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:21 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To me he basically called himself a tabloid shock jock. I can see how some people could find him entertaining but no one should act on his "reports". There's a reason why tabloids sell.

That's what I saw.

He does not hold himself accountable for the proven misinformation he purposefully disseminates, but seemingly seeks credibility. He doesn't source his own material and has a team that scourers the internet looking for material to put in front of him. How anyone could look to this guy for news is beyond me.

Sounds like the MSM.

Not really. Jones can consistently be wrong yet he suffers zero fallout. The MSM has to be right 100% of the time and they pay dearly when they aren't. Republicans have consistently played the MSM victim, which gave rise to talk radio, Fox News, and now to the loony conspiratorial websites like Infowars... each time going further down the rabbit hole.

The MSM is well below the Mendoza Line when it comes to their being right. I don't see them paying at all for the current coup attempt they are leading.

And they don't admit they have become little more than "shock jocks."

(06-19-2017 01:28 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 12:03 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 11:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:35 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 09:21 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To me he basically called himself a tabloid shock jock. I can see how some people could find him entertaining but no one should act on his "reports". There's a reason why tabloids sell.

That's what I saw.

He does not hold himself accountable for the proven misinformation he purposefully disseminates, but seemingly seeks credibility. He doesn't source his own material and has a team that scourers the internet looking for material to put in front of him. How anyone could look to this guy for news is beyond me.

Sounds like the MSM.

Not really. Jones can consistently be wrong yet he suffers zero fallout. The MSM has to be right 100% of the time and they pay dearly when they aren't. Republicans have consistently played the MSM victim, which gave rise to talk radio, Fox News, and now to the loony conspiratorial websites like Infowars... each time going further down the rabbit hole.

The MSM is well below the Mendoza Line when it comes to their being right. I don't see them paying at all for the current coup attempt they are leading.

untrue... but then, that's like your opinion, man.

(06-19-2017 11:45 AM)Kronke Wrote:  3.5 million viewers bahahahaha

Kelly couldn't even get the dead cat bounce. Just the 2 minutes video that Cernovich put out that spliced together her lies about how it wouldn't be a hit piece on the phone with NBC's preview did 6 million views on his Facebook.

She is D-O-N-E.

http://deadline.com/2017/06/megyn-kelly-...202115715/

Amazing how one can go on and on about little white lies that don't amount to diddly squat while defending outlandishly egregious lies.

Really wasn't even a hit piece. She just gave him the rope and let him hang himself.

(06-19-2017 05:55 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 11:45 AM)Kronke Wrote:  3.5 million viewers bahahahaha

Kelly couldn't even get the dead cat bounce. Just the 2 minutes video that Cernovich put out that spliced together her lies about how it wouldn't be a hit piece on the phone with NBC's preview did 6 million views on his Facebook.

She is D-O-N-E.

http://deadline.com/2017/06/megyn-kelly-...202115715/

Amazing how one can go on and on about little white lies that don't amount to diddly squat while defending outlandishly egregious lies.

Really wasn't even a hit piece. She just gave him the rope and let him hang himself.

You're on a different planet, even CNN, Media Matters, and WaPo admitted that Jones won the night. Like I've said previously, when everyone disagrees with you, perhaps it's time to stop and question what you think you know.

So is Alex Jones just a loony tunes idiot who believes Sandy Hook was a false flag or is he an evil piece of trash who knows it wasn't but tries to trick people into thinking it is? I'm actually struggling to decide which of those scenarios is actually worse. I think I'd rather him just be crazy enough to believe that instead of evil enough to know it's not true and still spew it.

(06-19-2017 06:19 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  So is Alex Jones just a loony tunes idiot who believes Sandy Hook was a false flag or is he an evil piece of trash who knows it wasn't but tries to trick people into thinking it is? I'm actually struggling to decide which of those scenarios is actually worse. I think I'd rather him just be crazy enough to believe that instead of evil enough to know it's not true and still spew it.

Up until Megyn Kelly, Jones didn't even talk about Sandy Hook anymore. You're being whipped up into a tizzy by fake news.

Everyone doesn't disagree with me. Guess you have the same problem accepting the posts here as you have accepting Alex getting his ass handed to him.

(06-19-2017 06:25 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 06:19 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  So is Alex Jones just a loony tunes idiot who believes Sandy Hook was a false flag or is he an evil piece of trash who knows it wasn't but tries to trick people into thinking it is? I'm actually struggling to decide which of those scenarios is actually worse. I think I'd rather him just be crazy enough to believe that instead of evil enough to know it's not true and still spew it.

Up until Megyn Kelly, Jones didn't even talk about Sandy Hook anymore. You're being whipped up into a tizzy by fake news.

Yet he only "tends to believe there were some people killed" and even though there is zero evidence still "understands why some believe it never happened when looking at the evidence".

He'll tell you has idiotic views on it if asked still.

And stop with the "fake news". You get your news "info" from the master of fake news so it's really asinine that you talk about anyone else being fake.

(06-19-2017 06:25 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-19-2017 06:19 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  So is Alex Jones just a loony tunes idiot who believes Sandy Hook was a false flag or is he an evil piece of trash who knows it wasn't but tries to trick people into thinking it is? I'm actually struggling to decide which of those scenarios is actually worse. I think I'd rather him just be crazy enough to believe that instead of evil enough to know it's not true and still spew it.

Up until Megyn Kelly, Jones didn't even talk about Sandy Hook anymore. You're being whipped up into a tizzy by fake news.

Fake news? HE SAID IT! So are you saying you are ashamed of his Sandy Hook comments and want everyone to just forget about them, or do you actually agree with him that no kids were actually killed and it was a false flag operation?

Jezz. She didn't put out fake news. She exposed fake news. Jones.

Did you even watch last night? He admitted he believed the bs he said about SH.

Obsess over it some more, Paul. Good grief.

You know Paul, Establishment's #1 fan, has lost what little credibility he had when he's got John01992 defending him.

Bravo, good sir.

Yeah, I'm the one obsessed with the nut and comes here and fouls the board spreading his bs. s.

(06-19-2017 07:00 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  You know Paul, Establishment's #1 fan, has lost what little credibility he had when he's got John01992 defending him.

Bravo, good sir.

Pipe down mouth breather.

Unless you want to humor me with more defenses of the indefensible.

Quick. Give me Jones's opinions on 9/11.