cb4029
The spoon that stirs the pot.
Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham
|
|
06-12-2017 05:15 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,975
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7073
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: The covfefe act.
does that come with bleu cheese and croutons???
|
|
06-12-2017 06:13 PM |
|
usmbacker
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17,677
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 1320
I Root For: Beer
Location: Margaritaville
|
RE: The covfefe act.
More troll bait
|
|
06-12-2017 06:15 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,975
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7073
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 06:15 PM)usmbacker Wrote: More troll bait
that's all firmbizzle does....but he's kinda funny doing it....he makes me laugh at times
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2017 06:17 PM by stinkfist.)
|
|
06-12-2017 06:17 PM |
|
Paul M
American-American
Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 06:17 PM)stinkfist Wrote: (06-12-2017 06:15 PM)usmbacker Wrote: More troll bait
that's all firmbizzle does....but he's kinda funny doing it....he makes me laugh at times
Pssst, look up.
|
|
06-12-2017 06:23 PM |
|
Niner National
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,602
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 494
I Root For: Charlotte 49ers
Location:
|
RE: The covfefe act.
I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
|
|
06-12-2017 07:07 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,975
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7073
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
sooooo....that's what is deemed 'acceptable'
I truly live in hell now....
|
|
06-12-2017 08:07 PM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
|
|
06-12-2017 08:24 PM |
|
UCGrad1992
Legend
Posts: 31,911
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2297
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
|
RE: The covfefe act.
"Covfefe" Act? Mike "Trying to Make a Name for Myself" Quigley.
The button pushing continues.
Quote:It should be noted, however, that there is still a question as to whether Trump's personal twitter account will be treated the same way as the official @POTUS account.
|
|
06-12-2017 08:44 PM |
|
Paul M
American-American
Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
|
|
06-12-2017 08:48 PM |
|
ark30inf
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,639
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
|
RE: The covfefe act.
My 90 year-old Hillary supporting ma is asking me when they are going to leave Trump alone?
That's not what you want.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
|
|
06-12-2017 08:54 PM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: The covfefe act.
your taxpayer money at work right there...
|
|
06-12-2017 09:43 PM |
|
ECUGrad07
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,258
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1276
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
|
RE: The covfefe act.
You're still on covfefe?
The resistance is losing steam.
|
|
06-13-2017 09:14 AM |
|
Lord Stanley
L'Étoile du Nord
Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-13-2017 09:14 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote: You're still on covfefe?
The resistance is losing steam.
I'm perfectly happy to continue to point la resit down every rabbit hole I can....
/covfefe
|
|
06-13-2017 09:17 AM |
|
JerryJeff
All American
Posts: 3,482
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 215
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?
|
|
06-13-2017 10:44 AM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer
Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?
Bless both your poor little hearts...
You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?
The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.
|
|
06-13-2017 11:38 AM |
|
ArmyBlazer
1st String
Posts: 1,161
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 121
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?
Bless both your poor little hearts...
You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?
The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.
Hmmmm. That's a good point.
|
|
06-13-2017 11:55 AM |
|
olliebaba
Legend
Posts: 28,237
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 2175
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
|
RE: The covfefe act.
All I see is the Liberalturds are trying to suppress free speech. If CB is loving it then I'll go opposite, I don't like CB to be happy, at all.
I haven't really seen any tweets from Trump that would make him squeamish to post. Keep it up Donnie that's the only tool you have against the MSM idiots. They hate it thus their insistence to squelch them...and you can't tell me it wasn't suggested by one of those idiot MSM CEOs.
Oh CB, you better watch what those Liberalturd congressmen pass or it might bite them like the Reid Bill. I'm sure the idiot is regretting it now.
|
|
06-13-2017 12:16 PM |
|
Godzilla
All American
Posts: 2,595
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 88
I Root For: TXST
Location:
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-12-2017 07:07 PM)Niner National Wrote: I actually agree with the bill. It's a form of communication and it should be public record.
The name of the bill is childish, however.
I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?
Bless both your poor little hearts...
You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?
The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.
I'm not sure how much experience on Twitter but unless you set your account to private everything you post is up for the public to see. Trump has not done this. Plus Potus doesn't own his tweets, Twitter does, when he agreed to the terms of service he agreed to relinquish all ownership and rights to decide what happens with those tweets.
|
|
06-13-2017 12:40 PM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: The covfefe act.
(06-13-2017 12:40 PM)Godzilla Wrote: (06-13-2017 11:38 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: (06-13-2017 10:44 AM)JerryJeff Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:48 PM)Paul M Wrote: (06-12-2017 08:24 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote: I'm sorry I have to be rude but that's absolutely idiotic.
A person doesn't lose their right to an opinion or the means of expression just because they assume a public office.
Public record = lose of right to opinion and expression.
See your first sentence.
I was having a hard time following that line of logic too. Since when does making your public statements/tweets a matter of public record, equal taking away your right to express your opinion?
Bless both your poor little hearts...
You don't get that by making something that is private public record is essentially seizing it?
The Twitter account is private, existed prior to the election, and discusses nothing other than opinion. The government has no legitimate claim to it other than to chill the speech.
I'm not sure how much experience on Twitter but unless you set your account to private everything you post is up for the public to see. Trump has not done this. Plus Potus doesn't own his tweets, Twitter does, when he agreed to the terms of service he agreed to relinquish all ownership and rights to decide what happens with those tweets.
Quote:Your Rights
You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. What’s yours is yours — you own your Content (and your photos and videos are part of the Content).
https://twitter.com/tos?lang=en
|
|
06-13-2017 12:50 PM |
|