http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/1...rship.html

To sum up the article:

A lawfully-elected mayor took it upon himself to remove the portrait of another lawfully-elected representative from a building funded by taxpayer dollars, claiming he took his actions, solely because, "We don't live in a dictatorship".

A bit ironic, no?

The house representative for Wyoming has informed the numbnuts that he hopes they can do without federal funding.

Watch this mayor backtrack really quickly.

Another article I read said that towns in Wyoming were already having to tighten their budgets due to lower mineral rights revenue. This would be a kick to the junk, all because some political hack thought he would try to be a wise guy.

Lol. Just hang up a sign that says we live in a world of pure butthurt and leave it there. Covers any possible scenario for that Mayor.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

I've never understood official Presidential pictures in state and local government offices. In our case here in SC I can understand the governor's picture hanging in a local government office because every local government here has it's power because of the state. It's not the other way around with the federal government.

(06-12-2017 04:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I've never understood official Presidential pictures in state and local government offices. In our case here in SC I can understand the governor's picture hanging in a local government office because every local government here has it's power because of the state. It's not the other way around with the federal government.

I get it as a courtesy, I never blinked when I saw Obama at the DMV etc.. I really don't have a problem with the mayor doing this, let him answer to his voters.

Jackson Hole is so 1989