(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

You can keep saying it, but that does not make you correct...

(06-13-2017 02:30 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:28 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:47 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:32 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Yeah, we only like winning.

Hey, it's no skin off my back if the GSWs decide not to go...or in words that you might understand.


WHO CARES!

Once again...you do, or else you wouldn't have said it.

You're absolutely right. I care just as much as I care about who wins the NBA title. I don't care about that either. Honest, Boy Scouts honor.

...and we circle back to my original point. If you have to tell someone that you don't care, what you're really telling them is you absolutely do care.

You're sounding like Redwingtom now.

Let me channel him some more...At least I'm consistent on this position.

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

You can keep saying it, but that does not make you correct...

How wrong you are, good sir. How wrong you are.

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

I'm posting AFTER I read what they did/will do. After I found out I posted I don't care. Makes sense?

(06-13-2017 02:37 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

I'm posting AFTER I read what they did/will do. After I found out I posted I don't care. Makes sense?

When or why is irrelevant. My point has always been, if you need to tell me you don't care...you're proving you do. Why else would I, or others, need to know that information?

(06-13-2017 02:39 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:37 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

I'm posting AFTER I read what they did/will do. After I found out I posted I don't care. Makes sense?

When or why is irrelevant. My point has always been, if you need to tell me you don't care...you're proving you do. Why else would I, or others, need to know that information?

why should we care if you care that they do not care?

(06-13-2017 02:39 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:37 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:31 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 12:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't care. I think it's dumb in general for professional sports teams to automatically get invited to the White House just for winning a championship. Most of these teams are filled with awful human beings that in other circumstances wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the President.

I'm getting real tired posting this, but you people keep making me. If you have to post that you don't care, it's quite obvious you do.

I'm posting AFTER I read what they did/will do. After I found out I posted I don't care. Makes sense?

When or why is irrelevant. My point has always been, if you need to tell me you don't care...you're proving you do. Why else would I, or others, need to know that information?

Because this board is being spammed with stupid threads, such as this one. This is a non-story.

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

(06-13-2017 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

If you're expecting him to take a hard stand on any single issue you're wasting your time. I'd rather deal with a hard core leftist tbqh. At least you know where they stand.

(06-13-2017 03:01 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

If you're expecting him to take a hard stand on any single issue you're wasting your time. I'd rather deal with a hard core leftist tbqh. At least you know where they stand.

Some people like you guys like to be caricatures of their movements. I can see pros and cons in every issue.

We'd all rather deal with a hardcore con or leftist because they are easy targets. Why would I want to be an easy target? Nuance is a beautiful thing.

(06-13-2017 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 03:01 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

If you're expecting him to take a hard stand on any single issue you're wasting your time. I'd rather deal with a hard core leftist tbqh. At least you know where they stand.

Some people like you guys like to be caricatures of their movements. I can see pros and cons in every issue.

We'd all rather deal with a hardcore con or leftist because they are easy targets. Why would I want to be an easy target? Nuance is a beautiful thing.

You aren't nuanced. At all. You can drop that charade right quick. You can stop pretending you're some worldly scholar who sees all and knows all. You and I both know that's a bunch of crap.

(06-13-2017 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Some people like you guys like to be caricatures of their movements. I can see pros and cons in every issue.

We'd all rather deal with a hardcore con or leftist because they are easy targets. Why would I want to be an easy target? Nuance is a beautiful thing.

Really? "pros and cons in EVERY issue"

That's what I call being a coward.

(06-13-2017 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

Is it really attacking conservatives to say that they're no better than liberals in my mind? I didn't attack them, I argue that they're equal. This being a largely conservative board, you guys get a lot of echo and I believe you really think that you're always taking the highroad and are better than the opposition.

You think saying anything to the contrary to your beliefs is an attack, which is not so. You guys (with some exceptions) do the same things in an argument that the left does: deflect, attack the source, attack personally.

On to the others:

I like that you had to go back to when I was in my early 20s to find contradiction in beliefs that I adopted after:

1. Leaving the military.
2. Getting married.
3. Graduating college.
4. Leaving the family business and getting my first real job.

So yes, between the ages of 23 to 26 I had a change of views. Hell, I believed single-payer was the way to go when I was 18 f*cking years old. So I'm not sure if I contradicted myself or life contradicted them for me.

To be quite honest, I'd rather be someone who takes lessons from life than a SNOWFLAKE who says they're being attacked because someone doesn't see their views to be as close to God as you do.

(06-13-2017 03:53 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 03:26 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 03:01 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-13-2017 01:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  What about my opinion of Obamacare? Free speech? 2nd amendment? Abortion?

Hard to say on abortion. I went back several records and you never really took a stance other than to attack conservatives.

On guns, we know you are happy to use the leftist tactic of emphasizing the word militia in the 2nd Amendment.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782459-post-133...id13341938

Quote:What well regulated militia are you a part of USMCVet?

This doesn't reflect my position on how much of a limit I would or wouldn't put on guns in this country, but the statement there before the first comma is the entire purpose of the amendment. Switzerland takes it seriously and their gun culture is responsible, while ours is surrounded by macho-ness and girls in bikinis at the shooting range. Without the organization, the second amendment is misguided.

(It also shows your ignorance of the history both the founding of our country and the evolution of the English language)

We also get your obligatory shot at conservatives
http://csnbbs.com/thread-711456-post-113...id11355159


We get this

http://csnbbs.com/thread-700235-post-110...id11034466

Quote:I'd be willing to bet that I'm more for an unfettered second amendment than most people here, I'll just never talk about guns like they're my surrogate dick. I lean libertarian.

Which directly contradicts your post above and with this:

http://csnbbs.com/thread-608714-post-874...pid8741874

Quote:I'm not one who believes that having a stockpile of weapons is going to do sh*t against our gov't and I think that we do need some sort of 'gun' control.

Make up your rabbit-assed mind.

But this post by YOU directly disputes what you are trying to say above.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-782649-post-133...id13348349

Quote:Straight out of the words of any strategist worth his salt ever. Even the founders of this nation did it.

Again, make up your rabbit-assed mind.

If you're expecting him to take a hard stand on any single issue you're wasting your time. I'd rather deal with a hard core leftist tbqh. At least you know where they stand.

Some people like you guys like to be caricatures of their movements. I can see pros and cons in every issue.

We'd all rather deal with a hardcore con or leftist because they are easy targets. Why would I want to be an easy target? Nuance is a beautiful thing.

You aren't nuanced. At all. You can drop that charade right quick. You can stop pretending you're some worldly scholar who sees all and knows all. You and I both know that's a bunch of crap.

Dude, you've spent your time in this thread commenting on the validity of other's ability to care about the OP's subject matter. Whatever your opinion is of my posts, pales in comparison to how everyone views yours.