Just minor correction.

Notice, there are always more retweets on the original mistake/lie than the correction.

Oops. Turns out that the truth was the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we initially reported. Our bad.

Putin wiped the floor with Fascinated Megyn. Made her look like an amateur.

All liberal news organizations have a long way to go to catch up to the lying record being set by the White House.

Spot on analysis of Basic Megyn and Putin, and the difference between fake news MSM and real journalism.

"According to the Washington Post, you hacked the election. How do you respond?"

bahahahaha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxWqgttlzSg&t=53m20s

I want to try to watch the interview - I assume NBC has it online somewhere? Part of Brit Hume's tweet probably stems from jealousy that NBC got that interview over Fox.

Did anyone watch Megyn Kelly's show. Any thoughts?

(06-06-2017 06:04 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I want to try to watch the interview - I assume NBC has it online somewhere? Part of Brit Hume's tweet probably stems from jealousy that NBC got that interview over Fox.

Did anyone watch Megyn Kelly's show. Any thoughts?

Its probably all because Fox is the only major news organization to call the other MSM on their fake news, especially sensational fake news.

(06-06-2017 06:04 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I want to try to watch the interview - I assume NBC has it online somewhere? Part of Brit Hume's tweet probably stems from jealousy that NBC got that interview over Fox.

Did anyone watch Megyn Kelly's show. Any thoughts?

Why do I want to watch Megyn Kelly talk about Megyn Kelly. That clown only cares about 2 things...Megyn Kelly and Megyn Kelly.

I've only read about parts of it... but yeah, it sounds like Megyn didn't do so well with this interview.. Which is a shame, cause we KNOW she _can_ get information... so why didn't she is the question?

Not to mention the backlash she got with the Indian PM interview...

(06-06-2017 08:56 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I've only read about parts of it... but yeah, it sounds like Megyn didn't do so well with this interview.. Which is a shame, cause we KNOW she _can_ get information... so why didn't she is the question?

Not to mention the backlash she got with the Indian PM interview...

She's really become full of herself. Thinks she is the story, not the interviewee.

Quote:The former Fox News diva who everyone loves to hate BOMBED out in her first prime-time network gig on NBC.

Kelly’s newsmagazine program debuted with a Vladimir Putin interview, in which he mocked her relentlessly.

Kelly bombed in the ratings, finishing behind a 60 Minutes RERUN.

http://truthfeed.com/flop-megyn-kellys-n...omb/79027/

I just watched the interview... all of the times they cut away to Megyn talking over stock video was RIDICULOUS. It's basically her saying "Don't believe what he said... here's what the mainstream media says."

(06-05-2017 10:01 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  All liberal news organizations have a long way to go to catch up to the lying record being set by the White House.

If you're talking about the obama led White House, you'd be correct...

I wouldn't waste my time. A rerun of an old movie would beat her in the what to watch department.

bahahahaha, Fascinated Megyn was in Austin today to interview Alex Jones.

It will undoubtedly be a hit piece, and I haven't watched a second of her since she left Fox, but talk about MUST WATCH television. Hopefully Alex behaves (not likely).

I watched it last night. The interview was completely undone by (a) the silly looking translator devices in Putin's ear and (b) the voice of the Russian interpreter (he sounded like a bad Japanese dubbed movie).

I'll try to watch the other two segments of the show later tonight. So far, it does seem like 60 Minutes light (very light). But I'll give her a chance. Sometimes the first show is rough.

(06-07-2017 06:13 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I watched it last night. The interview was completely undone by (a) the silly looking translator devices in Putin's ear and (b) the voice of the Russian interpreter (he sounded like a bad Japanese dubbed movie).

I'll try to watch the other two segments of the show later tonight. So far, it does seem like 60 Minutes light (very light). But I'll give her a chance. Sometimes the first show is rough.

In the clip I saw, they didn't even play Putin's voice, just that of the interpreter. Tone is an important part of an interview, but they completely cut out his sound. That is a huge editorial flaw.