John Kerry: Travel Ban Is “Worst Thing We Can Do,” Terrorists Are Alienated, Without “Opportunities”





It’s just because they’re poor alienated boys who need more opportunities. And Kerry would give them the opportunities, with this approach.

Quote:Former Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday said Americans stand with the British people following an attack Saturday in London that left at least seven people dead.

“Every American feels as if we were attacked also,” Kerry said on NBC’s “Meet The Press.”

“There isn’t anybody in America today who doesn’t reach out and express our sorrow and our solidarity with the British people.”

But Kerry emphasized how difficult it is to prevent these kinds of attacks.
“The fact is, if people want to kill themselves, this is really hard for law enforcement,” he said.

“What we really need to do is focus more, I believe, not on a travel ban … it’s the worst thing we can do,” he continued, referring to President Trump’s efforts to temporarily bar nationals from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S.

http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-...acked-also

(06-04-2017 09:24 PM)Kronke Wrote:  The little doe-eyed cuck Brian Stelter has responded. He takes the generic public for idiots, and completely denies what you can see with your own eyes. He also insults the people bringing the story to the forefront as "far right" and Cernovich as a "blogger" when he's more of a journalist than Stelter could ever dream to be.

https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/...8978262016

lmao. his show... "reliable sources"... I dont even know who this cue ball is but I can tell you that's bull****.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

We need a jobs program, not a travel ban. If only they could get good-paying jobs, they wouldn't need to go blowing people up.

(06-04-2017 10:29 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  We need a jobs program, not a travel ban. If only they could get good-paying jobs, they wouldn't need to go blowing people up.

Marie Barf!

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40155451

Quote:t has also emerged that two people said they had warned the police about the behaviour of one of the attackers.

Speaking to the BBC's Asian Network, an unnamed man said one of the attackers had become more extreme over the past two years.

"We spoke about a particular attack that happened and like most radicals he had a justification for anything - everything and anything.

"And that day I realised that I need to contact the authorities," he said.

He said no action was taken.

"I did my bit... but the authorities didn't do their bit".

(06-04-2017 11:58 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40155451

Quote:t has also emerged that two people said they had warned the police about the behaviour of one of the attackers.

Speaking to the BBC's Asian Network, an unnamed man said one of the attackers had become more extreme over the past two years.

"We spoke about a particular attack that happened and like most radicals he had a justification for anything - everything and anything.

"And that day I realised that I need to contact the authorities," he said.

He said no action was taken.

"I did my bit... but the authorities didn't do their bit".

This seems to be the story after every attack.

Why aren't authorities following up on these people more closely?

(06-04-2017 09:26 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 09:24 PM)Kronke Wrote:  The little doe-eyed cuck Brian Stelter has responded. He takes the generic public for idiots, and completely denies what you can see with your own eyes. He also insults the people bringing the story to the forefront as "far right" and Cernovich as a "blogger" when he's more of a journalist than Stelter could ever dream to be.

https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/...8978262016

lmao. his show... "reliable sources"... I dont even know who this cue ball is but I can tell you that's bull****.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

I can't figure out if they were trying to be Orwellian or if they are so afraid of being called fake news that they found it prudent to tell Stelter's 200k (or whatever) braindead zombie viewers that he is reliable.

Just look at the engagement on his tweet. 400 retweets. Cernovich's accusation got 3,100 and he (supposedly) has half the followers. Are the vast majority of Stelter's followers fake like his news???

(06-05-2017 12:11 AM)Niner National Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 11:58 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40155451

Quote:t has also emerged that two people said they had warned the police about the behaviour of one of the attackers.

Speaking to the BBC's Asian Network, an unnamed man said one of the attackers had become more extreme over the past two years.

"We spoke about a particular attack that happened and like most radicals he had a justification for anything - everything and anything.

"And that day I realised that I need to contact the authorities," he said.

He said no action was taken.

"I did my bit... but the authorities didn't do their bit".

This seems to be the story after every attack.

Why aren't authorities following up on these people more closely?

Dunno about Britain but a huge reason here is the fact that they are afraid of being accused of profiling.

(06-04-2017 02:08 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

Want proof....



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...hters.html

Hunh. They're close in that, but I don't recall zerO being with glasses, nor balding?!?

MSNBC Host Questions if Unarmed London Police Overreacted With Too Much Force




You just can't make this stuff up.

Quote:MSNBC host Richard Lui sunk to new levels of delusion when he asked if London police can possibly apply too much force and overreact to terror attacks.

Reminder, the UK Police were UNARMED and ran from the stabbing terrorists while citizens threw chairs at them.

In case you were on the fence of whether liberalism is a mental disorder or not, this should convince you. Islamic terrorists plowed over and stabbed pedestrians, killing 7 people and injuring up to 45 more and this media sycophant is wondering if there’s a risk of unarmed police using too much force.


"Richard Lui: “You’ve analyzed these incidents post-facto as well as during as you have so many times with me and others here on MSNBC and NBC News.

What is the risk–there’s certainly a risk of under reaction, but is there any risk of overreaction? Of deploying too much? You know as we’ve been watching all of this live coming in…

…Is there ever a point where you go well that’s too much, or you shouldn’t be applying that amount of force there?”


Jim Cavanaugh, NBC law enforcement analyst said, “the response cannot be too large.”

“Well in the city that’s experiencing the attacks–multiple attacks–really I don’t think the response can be too large.”

Little girls were targeted and killed last week in Manchester and more innocent civilians had their throats sliced by Muslims in a Ramadan terrorist attack and this guy wonders if there’s a risk of applying too much force? Unbelievable.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/...rce-video/

CNN doesn't surprise me. There are a number of regular posters on here who likely share the opinion. The proglodytes should sponsor a Muslim Lives Matter group.

Americans who claim to "know" many good Muslims, might want to reconsider their invitation to the Muslim's pre-4th of July barbecue.

(06-05-2017 07:49 AM)LeFlâneur Wrote:  CNN doesn't surprise me. There are a number of regular posters on here who likely share the opinion. The proglodytes should sponsor a Muslim Lives Matter group.

Americans who claim to "know" many good Muslims, might want to reconsider their invitation to the Muslim's pre-4th of July barbecue.

Of course there are. A couple of our best friends are Muslim. But there are branches, especially in the Middle East, that are simply the embodiment of hate. They use terrorism, the last resort of losers.

I know many good Hells Angels, Rogues and Mongols. Been in my home. Partied with 'em. But I've never deluded myself that any of them aren't capable of killing.

(06-04-2017 08:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 08:45 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

How inept are the British. It is like they are beyond incompetent and stupid.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...s-net.html

Its like the british have two groups of people; those who are to identify the threats, and those who are supposed to deal with them. The first group has been pretty good. The second group has been pathetic.

And the difference here in the US is what?

(06-05-2017 12:15 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 09:26 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 09:24 PM)Kronke Wrote:  The little doe-eyed cuck Brian Stelter has responded. He takes the generic public for idiots, and completely denies what you can see with your own eyes. He also insults the people bringing the story to the forefront as "far right" and Cernovich as a "blogger" when he's more of a journalist than Stelter could ever dream to be.

https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/...8978262016

lmao. his show... "reliable sources"... I dont even know who this cue ball is but I can tell you that's bull****.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

I can't figure out if they were trying to be Orwellian or if they are so afraid of being called fake news that they found it prudent to tell Stelter's 200k (or whatever) braindead zombie viewers that he is reliable.

Just look at the engagement on his tweet. 400 retweets. Cernovich's accusation got 3,100 and he (supposedly) has half the followers. Are the vast majority of Stelter's followers fake like his news???

The show was always called Reliable Sources. Well before Brian Stelter took over the show.

(06-05-2017 08:14 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 08:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its like the british have two groups of people; those who are to identify the threats, and those who are supposed to deal with them. The first group has been pretty good. The second group has been pathetic.

And the difference here in the US is what?

Here in the USA, at least the cops and some civvies might have been armed. Better than throwing pint glasses and chairs.

(06-05-2017 10:19 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 08:14 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 08:49 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its like the british have two groups of people; those who are to identify the threats, and those who are supposed to deal with them. The first group has been pretty good. The second group has been pathetic.

And the difference here in the US is what?

Here in the USA, at least the cops and some civvies might have been armed. Better than throwing pint glasses and chairs.

I was referring to the fact that we, like the Brits, invariably know who the attackers are before they act and fail to stop them. usm's part of that post.

ISIS rock star Choudary extends Islamist influence – even from behind bars

Quote:A jailed British hate preacher who has become ISIS’ rock star radicalizer in the U.K. has been linked to one of the suspected jihadis behind Saturday’s van and knife attack in London -- but it’s only the latest example of the Islamist leader’s tentacles touching ISIS plots in England.

Anjem Choudary, 50, was sentenced to 5 ½ years in prison in September for his vocal support of ISIS and had been a visible Islamist activist in England since at least 2002. He has called the 9/11 hijackers “magnificent martyrs,” declined to condemn terror attacks on British soil and predicted Britain will become a Muslim country within 30 years.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/05/...-bars.html

(06-03-2017 07:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  London police advising people to run and hide.

and don't forget tell. It's run, hide, tell. smh