(07-04-2017 06:44 AM)Cubanbull Wrote: USF announced our nonconference schedule
Nov 10 Florida Atlantic 280
Nov 13 Morgan State 326
Nov 15 at Stetson 327
Nov 19 at Indiana 82
Nov 22 Howard 339
Nov 24 Arkansas State 114
Nov 26 Eastern Michigan 178 (12-17)
Nov 30 at Elon 163
Dec 2. at Appalachian State 295
Dec 11 Florida International 337
Dec 14 Bethune Cookman 347
Dec 18 Northern Arizona 335
Dec 21 Charlotte 245
I like our schedule for the team that we will have this year. We are expected to be at the bottom of league, so the schedule is one we should handle. We need to beat those lower RPI teams and come out better than .500 I would hope 8-5 at least
your schedule is actually horrific ..extremely horrific ...and coming 8-5 out of that will destroy the league...
if you're going to schedule horribly you have to win most of it.. 10-3 on that schedule is a must..if you expect losses throw some good rpi games in there
we honestly need a scheduling mandate. too many teams have this mentality of "we are supposed to be horrible this year so a horrible schedule is probably better for us".. thats how you eventually end up a 1 bid league..we have the lowest ranked OOC sos ranking by any power conference and below 5 other conference who are mid-major
usf was by far the lowest rpi team of any power conference +a10/wcc (similar horrible schedule last year)...Oregon state on only 4 wins was ranked 40 spots higher ...
its a trickling effect..then memphis had the most wins of any power conference team not to make the NIT/ncaa
then smu and uc on 30 wins are only 5-6 seeds in the tourney
and pride plays into it too...Tulane schedules great because theylll do buy games...ecu/ usf are too proud to to that...and what good team wants to schedule a home and home with 260+ rpi teams
this isnt a knock on on those teams either, houston is the exact same way...we have a decent schedule this season because are expected to be a top 100 rpi team..but when we are projected bad,, our schedules are just as bad....
put a mandate of 1 top 50 rpi team and 2 other top 100 rpis, in the previous season (or projected by the aac staff) minimum/ no more than 2 300+ rpi games...or you lose ncaa credit money...make teams push their pride aside
just speaking from a houston standpoint we are too proud to do buy games unless we are forced even if we knew it would help the conference