Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Better Call Saul
Author Message
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #21
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-10-2017 06:45 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  
(05-10-2017 03:19 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The thing about that episode is that for Charles McGill to be as literate as he was about EM radiation, he should've known that he was no more at risk from a battery than he was from a fountain pen. That said, the notion of EM sensitivity is irrational to begin with, so he's clearly deranged, but chucking the battery on the floor in horror kind of ruined it for me. Sensitive tools could probably register the radiation from a cell phone sans battery, but would likely register nothing above background for the battery alone.

I wouldn't say he chucked it on the floor, and even if he did I interpreted it not as "oh wow a battery I need to throw it away because of my EHS" but as "oh s*** Jimmy got the best of me."

Phenomenal episode either way. The first two and a half seasons were all building up to last night until it reached its boiling point and spilled over. The ironic thing about it all is that even if Chuck is an a-hole, he's still right. Jimmy really is guilty of fraud and everything he talked about in his rant, it's just that the great Charles McGill got out-lawyered by Slippin' Jimmy.

Yeah...Im guessing that Chuck is done at this point since he never reared his head in BB. It is looking like Jimmy is heading for more and more shady schit from here.
05-10-2017 08:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brookes Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,965
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 165
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesDonators
Post: #22
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-10-2017 03:19 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The thing about that episode is that for Charles McGill to be as literate as he was about EM radiation, he should've known that he was no more at risk from a battery than he was from a fountain pen. That said, the notion of EM sensitivity is irrational to begin with, so he's clearly deranged, but chucking the battery on the floor in horror kind of ruined it for me. Sensitive tools could probably register the radiation from a cell phone sans battery, but would likely register nothing above background for the battery alone.

I don't think I saw it the way you did. When it is revealed to Chuck (and anyone else in the room who hadn't already figured it out) that he was not suffering from a physical ailment but a mental illness, it didn't lessen his suffering. The pain, even if psychosomatic, still felt real. We already knew batteries caused him pain (earlier episode with tape recorder), so realizing the presence of that battery caused him pain, even if it also caused him a great deal of cognitive dissonance.

I love how the writing and acting are pulling our heartstrings in every direction. We root for Jimmy to beat his brother even though he was guilty of every terrible thing Chuck accused him of, while we hope that Jimmy will finally get on the right path because he can't have Kim if he doesn't. And we want Chuck to lose because he's such a dick to his brother, even though his brother did all those terrible things, while we also root for Chuck to recover and somehow have a good relationship with his brother.

And following up on Fo's point, we root for all these things knowing full well that the future brings none of those good outcomes. Great show.
(This post was last modified: 05-10-2017 11:13 PM by Brookes Owl.)
05-10-2017 10:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #23
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-10-2017 06:45 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  
(05-10-2017 03:19 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The thing about that episode is that for Charles McGill to be as literate as he was about EM radiation, he should've known that he was no more at risk from a battery than he was from a fountain pen. That said, the notion of EM sensitivity is irrational to begin with, so he's clearly deranged, but chucking the battery on the floor in horror kind of ruined it for me. Sensitive tools could probably register the radiation from a cell phone sans battery, but would likely register nothing above background for the battery alone.

I wouldn't say he chucked it on the floor, and even if he did I interpreted it not as "oh wow a battery I need to throw it away because of my EHS" but as "oh s*** Jimmy got the best of me."

Phenomenal episode either way. The first two and a half seasons were all building up to last night until it reached its boiling point and spilled over. The ironic thing about it all is that even if Chuck is an a-hole, he's still right. Jimmy really is guilty of fraud and everything he talked about in his rant, it's just that the great Charles McGill got out-lawyered by Slippin' Jimmy.
I agree it was a good episode and I love the show and characters. They had layed the groundwork but it still struck me a bit sour...and this is a show built on being pretty scientifically literate, even though all shows must take liberties.

Sent from my SM-G935T using CSNbbs mobile app
05-10-2017 10:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Offline
Unapologetic A-hole
*

Posts: 72,633
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 5784
I Root For: yo mama
Location: is everything
Post: #24
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-10-2017 10:14 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  
(05-10-2017 03:19 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The thing about that episode is that for Charles McGill to be as literate as he was about EM radiation, he should've known that he was no more at risk from a battery than he was from a fountain pen. That said, the notion of EM sensitivity is irrational to begin with, so he's clearly deranged, but chucking the battery on the floor in horror kind of ruined it for me. Sensitive tools could probably register the radiation from a cell phone sans battery, but would likely register nothing above background for the battery alone.

I don't think I saw it the way you did. When it is revealed to Chuck (and anyone else in the room who hadn't already figured it out) that he was not suffering from a physical ailment but a mental illness, it didn't lessen his suffering. The pain, even if psychosomatic, still felt real. We already knew batteries caused him pain (earlier episode with tape recorder), so realizing the presence of that battery caused him pain, even if it also caused him a great deal of cognitive dissonance.

I love how the writing and acting are pulling our heartstrings in every direction. We root for Jimmy to beat his brother even though he was guilty of every terrible thing Chuck accused him of, while we hope that Jimmy will finally get on the right path because he can't have Kim if he doesn't. And we want Chuck to lose because he's such a dick to his brother, even though his brother did all those terrible things, while we also root for Chuck to recover and somehow have a good relationship with his brother.

And following up on Fo's point, we root for all these things knowing full well that the future brings none of those good outcomes. Great show.

Nicely done.
05-11-2017 10:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MonarchManiac Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,600
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 208
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location: Norfolk, VA
Post: #25
RE: Better Call Saul
Yes - so painful to know that Jimmy won't end up with Kim, that he will ultimately ruin that relationship. Kim is awesome!
05-11-2017 11:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #26
RE: Better Call Saul
05-11-2017 02:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #27
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-10-2017 10:14 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  
(05-10-2017 03:19 PM)I45owl Wrote:  The thing about that episode is that for Charles McGill to be as literate as he was about EM radiation, he should've known that he was no more at risk from a battery than he was from a fountain pen. That said, the notion of EM sensitivity is irrational to begin with, so he's clearly deranged, but chucking the battery on the floor in horror kind of ruined it for me. Sensitive tools could probably register the radiation from a cell phone sans battery, but would likely register nothing above background for the battery alone.

I don't think I saw it the way you did. When it is revealed to Chuck (and anyone else in the room who hadn't already figured it out) that he was not suffering from a physical ailment but a mental illness, it didn't lessen his suffering. The pain, even if psychosomatic, still felt real. We already knew batteries caused him pain (earlier episode with tape recorder), so realizing the presence of that battery caused him pain, even if it also caused him a great deal of cognitive dissonance.

I love how the writing and acting are pulling our heartstrings in every direction. We root for Jimmy to beat his brother even though he was guilty of every terrible thing Chuck accused him of, while we hope that Jimmy will finally get on the right path because he can't have Kim if he doesn't. And we want Chuck to lose because he's such a dick to his brother, even though his brother did all those terrible things, while we also root for Chuck to recover and somehow have a good relationship with his brother.

And following up on Fo's point, we root for all these things knowing full well that the future brings none of those good outcomes. Great show.

I think this is a great analysis. I've known some very bright people that believe squirrely things, but my comments were pretty much limited to the fact that, for a lawyer, it's impressive that he could talk and understand inverse squared laws (that's something that seemingly eludes most folks that talk about transmission lines and elementary schools), but wouldn't realize that batteries don't draw current if the circuit is not closed.
05-11-2017 02:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brookes Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,965
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 165
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesDonators
Post: #28
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-11-2017 02:33 PM)I45owl Wrote:  I've known some very bright people that believe squirrely things, but my comments were pretty much limited to the fact that, for a lawyer, it's impressive that he could talk and understand inverse squared laws (that's something that seemingly eludes most folks that talk about transmission lines and elementary schools), but wouldn't realize that batteries don't draw current if the circuit is not closed.

Yeah, that didn't occur to me but it makes sense. Apologies for going astray here, but I work with regulators. A lot. And a rule I often keep in mind in dealing with these folks: Avoid applying rational thought to irrational actors.

I think this would describe how I view Chuck.
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2017 04:18 PM by Brookes Owl.)
05-11-2017 04:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #29
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-11-2017 04:16 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  
(05-11-2017 02:33 PM)I45owl Wrote:  I've known some very bright people that believe squirrely things, but my comments were pretty much limited to the fact that, for a lawyer, it's impressive that he could talk and understand inverse squared laws (that's something that seemingly eludes most folks that talk about transmission lines and elementary schools), but wouldn't realize that batteries don't draw current if the circuit is not closed.

Yeah, that didn't occur to me but it makes sense. Apologies for going astray here, but I work with regulators. A lot. And a rule I often keep in mind in dealing with these folks: Avoid applying rational thought to irrational actors.

I think this would describe how I view Chuck.

I think he has an irrational belief, but that's not uncommon for anyone... it's very difficult not to. However, Chuck is at or near the top of his profession, which demands rational thought. I'm conflicted as to how the writers introduced the whole battery thing ... I have to believe that they deliberately put in something they knew to be absurd. If they established that Jimmy knew about his fear of batteries, I could accept the ploy. I wonder if they wanted to avoid actually having something that conducted current next to Chuck specifically because they didn't want to upset the electromagnetic-phobia lobby, and just hoped no-one would object? I'm sure that they didn't want to detract from the series by having to apologize to the Chucks of the world for implying that their problem was mental and not real.
05-12-2017 02:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #30
RE: Better Call Saul
Incidentally...

'Breaking Bad' adviser on TV's scientific accuracy | ZDNet
Quote:Donna Nelson wants scientists to watch television without groaning at inaccuracies. So when Nelson, a chemistry professor at the University of Oklahoma and a visiting professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, heard the AMC series Breaking Bad needed a chemist adviser, she volunteered.
05-12-2017 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Brookes Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,965
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 165
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesDonators
Post: #31
RE: Better Call Saul
(05-12-2017 02:23 PM)I45owl Wrote:  I think he has an irrational belief, but that's not uncommon for anyone... it's very difficult not to. However, Chuck is at or near the top of his profession, which demands rational thought.

Sure, but his phobia is presented as such an overwhelming driver of his decision making that it's easy for me to think of him as an irrational actor who occasionally dabbles in a rational profession. His "Colonel Jessup" moment on the stand kind of confirms that for me.

Quote:...they didn't want to upset the electromagnetic-phobia lobby...

Nice
05-12-2017 03:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,121
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Better Call Saul
I thought of the scene in Caine Mutiny when Captain Queeg (Bogart) goes all unhinged at the court martial hearing.

The parallel between Chuck losing it and Queeg going bonkers over how he determined geometric logic that there must be an extra key was astounding. Even to when both characters self-realize how over the top they have become.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-95QqBXLG2I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rreFXFnlKO4
starting at about 3:00
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2017 03:26 PM by tanqtonic.)
05-12-2017 03:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
I45owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,374
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 184
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Dallas, TX

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #33
RE: Better Call Saul
Best Part of this week's episode was Jimmy Saul and Kim drinking Shiner Bock* in the closing scene. That is a man's beer.






* Shiner Bock <--- NOT an IPA
05-17-2017 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.