Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Lenvillecards Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,463
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 376
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #21
ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 10:49 AM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:11 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To have a successful conference network in Mexico I think you will need a quality soccer & baseball product first & foremost. Both the SEC & the ACC being strong in both of these sports I think would bold well for their networks as both conferences reach into strong Hispanic/Latino populations here in America, south Florida for the ACC & Texas for the SEC, for recruiting.

(If the ACCN is a success.)

I don't know how women's soccer will pan out in a macho society. As far as baseball is concerned the SEC is much deeper and has the much longer history of being so. Until Virginia won the title a couple of years ago it had been since the 50's that the ACC even had a title in the sport. And again, since we are discussing Mexico I'm sure their interest would be in Texas schools since many of those programs have Hispanics on the teams. Miami would be, perhaps, the best draw for the ACC, but then Cubans and Mexicans don't always mesh. The two cultures, and even the Spanish spoken, varies to a large degree between the two.

But Lenville, lacrosse aside, the SEC and ACC do share many of the same interests and more of the same history and culture than either of us do with another conference. So if the ACCN is successful then a blending of the two for future involvement in Mexico might be in the offing.

My main point about Texas schools in the ACC is that it has never made business or geographical sense. Some of X's wacky trade us "South Carolina" posts make more sense. Also the ACC adding West Virginia makes more sense than taking a Texas school. Your natural additions are West Virginia, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and of course Notre Dame but only because of their East Coast ties. Geographically they are Great Lakes.

I agree.

The ACC only goes west for Texas & only for the $. Truthfully, I would be happier with ND & 1 of WV, Cincinnati or UCONN. If the $ was right then all 3. Texas & Oklahoma make the most sense in the SEC.
04-22-2017 12:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AllTideUp Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,157
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 561
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #22
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.
04-22-2017 04:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #23
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 12:42 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:49 AM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:11 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To have a successful conference network in Mexico I think you will need a quality soccer & baseball product first & foremost. Both the SEC & the ACC being strong in both of these sports I think would bold well for their networks as both conferences reach into strong Hispanic/Latino populations here in America, south Florida for the ACC & Texas for the SEC, for recruiting.

(If the ACCN is a success.)

I don't know how women's soccer will pan out in a macho society. As far as baseball is concerned the SEC is much deeper and has the much longer history of being so. Until Virginia won the title a couple of years ago it had been since the 50's that the ACC even had a title in the sport. And again, since we are discussing Mexico I'm sure their interest would be in Texas schools since many of those programs have Hispanics on the teams. Miami would be, perhaps, the best draw for the ACC, but then Cubans and Mexicans don't always mesh. The two cultures, and even the Spanish spoken, varies to a large degree between the two.

But Lenville, lacrosse aside, the SEC and ACC do share many of the same interests and more of the same history and culture than either of us do with another conference. So if the ACCN is successful then a blending of the two for future involvement in Mexico might be in the offing.

My main point about Texas schools in the ACC is that it has never made business or geographical sense. Some of X's wacky trade us "South Carolina" posts make more sense. Also the ACC adding West Virginia makes more sense than taking a Texas school. Your natural additions are West Virginia, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and of course Notre Dame but only because of their East Coast ties. Geographically they are Great Lakes.

I agree.

The ACC only goes west for Texas & only for the $. Truthfully, I would be happier with ND & 1 of WV, Cincinnati or UCONN. If the $ was right then all 3. Texas & Oklahoma make the most sense in the SEC.

If the ACC is starting a network then it makes absolute sense to add Cincinnati and Connecticut two good markets, and hold the West Virginia spot for Notre Dame's full inclusion, or the break up of the Big 12 depending upon which one comes first.

Ohio, Connecticut, Indiana plus Catholics everywhere, and a strong regional sports brand in West Virginia all would help.

Plus if the ACC shores up and makes a run with it of the ACCN it will only encourage the SEC even more to do what it takes with the Big 12. I'll bet with ESPN's interest in the state of Texas that wheels have and are being greased to facilitate Texas, another Texas school, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to the SEC. If West Virginia could find a home in the ACC upon a break up it might encourage the SEC to think about moving to 20 and taking Kansas and either Kansas State or Iowa State to get there. Then if my thinking about the PAC is correct in that they would love to get into the Texas market Texas Tech and T.C.U. head to the PAC quite possibly with U.N.L.V. and another. If that scenario looked likely I think the school traveling with Texas would be Baylor.

There is some protectionism for Baylor in the state since it was the state's first University (their oldest institution of higher learning). So if we had to have a third Texas school and Tech had a P5 home waiting on them they make sense.

But if we could work that deal to just pick up Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State then Kansas looks realistic and 18 would be the stopping point.
04-22-2017 04:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #24
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 04:05 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.

There are no accidents when something as large as a network puts this much focus in one area. Remember Corso insinuated that in 5 years Texas and Oklahoma would make a move like A&M's. Put the SECN in Mexico, convert the LHN Dallas studio into a bilingual transmission site the SEC's western half, develop some in state pull for bowl access and tourism, give OU and UT a travel selection to go with them and you have fairly well sewed this up.

For those who say we don't need two unnecessary mouths to feed, they just need to remember that if we go that route we are claiming two top 10 brands, two historic programs, and those they are bringing with them aren't exactly slouches either. The average of the 4 still increase our MEAN Gross Revenue, only negligibly affect our attendance numbers and those may go up in the SEC, and they likely add enough content to bump us close to the 50 million per school payout range on TV revenue.

So if that is what it takes to close the deal and remove the only two players from the table that could give a competitor a leg up on us, then it's well worth it. And if UT helps the penetration into the Mexico market it could pay dividends that push us beyond 50.

"So let it be written. So let it be done!"
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2017 11:37 PM by JRsec.)
04-22-2017 04:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AllTideUp Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,157
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 561
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #25
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 04:56 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:05 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.

There are no accidents when something as large as a network puts this much focus in one area. Remember Corso insinuated that in 5 years Texas and Oklahoma would make a move like A&M's. Put the SECN in Mexico, convert the LHN Dallas studio into a bilingual transmission site the SEC's western half, develop some in state pull for bowl access and tourism, give OU and UT a travel selection to go with them and you have fairly well sewed this up.

For those who say we don't need two unnecessary mouths to feed, they just need to remember that if we go that route we are claiming to top 10 brands, two historic programs, and those they are bringing with them aren't exactly slouches either. The average of the 4 still increase our MEAN Gross Revenue, only negligibly affect our attendance numbers and those may go up in the SEC, and they likely add enough content to bump us close to the 50 million per school payout range on TV revenue.

So if that is what it takes to close the deal and remove the only two players from the table that could give a competitor a leg up on us, then it's well worth it. And if UT helps the penetration into the Mexico market it could pay dividends that push us beyond 50.

"So let it be written. So let it be done!"

I think converting the LHN into a Spanish language version of the network is definitely the way to go. Not only would it make sense logistically, but it would help in giving the Spanish speaking population in the US a different cable option. That in and of itself would add to the pot.

The Spanish language offerings on cable packages should still be a growing market if for no more reason then there are fewer options in the US when it comes to streaming in Spanish. I'm sure that will change one day as the Latino population grows, but for now...
04-22-2017 05:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #26
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 05:12 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:56 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:05 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.

There are no accidents when something as large as a network puts this much focus in one area. Remember Corso insinuated that in 5 years Texas and Oklahoma would make a move like A&M's. Put the SECN in Mexico, convert the LHN Dallas studio into a bilingual transmission site the SEC's western half, develop some in state pull for bowl access and tourism, give OU and UT a travel selection to go with them and you have fairly well sewed this up.

For those who say we don't need two unnecessary mouths to feed, they just need to remember that if we go that route we are claiming to top 10 brands, two historic programs, and those they are bringing with them aren't exactly slouches either. The average of the 4 still increase our MEAN Gross Revenue, only negligibly affect our attendance numbers and those may go up in the SEC, and they likely add enough content to bump us close to the 50 million per school payout range on TV revenue.

So if that is what it takes to close the deal and remove the only two players from the table that could give a competitor a leg up on us, then it's well worth it. And if UT helps the penetration into the Mexico market it could pay dividends that push us beyond 50.

"So let it be written. So let it be done!"

I think converting the LHN into a Spanish language version of the network is definitely the way to go. Not only would it make sense logistically, but it would help in giving the Spanish speaking population in the US a different cable option. That in and of itself would add to the pot.

The Spanish language offerings on cable packages should still be a growing market if for no more reason then there are fewer options in the US when it comes to streaming in Spanish. I'm sure that will change one day as the Latino population grows, but for now...

ATU, I'm optimistic for the way this one is shaping up.
04-22-2017 11:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lenvillecards Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,463
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 376
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #27
ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 04:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 12:42 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:49 AM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:11 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To have a successful conference network in Mexico I think you will need a quality soccer & baseball product first & foremost. Both the SEC & the ACC being strong in both of these sports I think would bold well for their networks as both conferences reach into strong Hispanic/Latino populations here in America, south Florida for the ACC & Texas for the SEC, for recruiting.

(If the ACCN is a success.)

I don't know how women's soccer will pan out in a macho society. As far as baseball is concerned the SEC is much deeper and has the much longer history of being so. Until Virginia won the title a couple of years ago it had been since the 50's that the ACC even had a title in the sport. And again, since we are discussing Mexico I'm sure their interest would be in Texas schools since many of those programs have Hispanics on the teams. Miami would be, perhaps, the best draw for the ACC, but then Cubans and Mexicans don't always mesh. The two cultures, and even the Spanish spoken, varies to a large degree between the two.

But Lenville, lacrosse aside, the SEC and ACC do share many of the same interests and more of the same history and culture than either of us do with another conference. So if the ACCN is successful then a blending of the two for future involvement in Mexico might be in the offing.

My main point about Texas schools in the ACC is that it has never made business or geographical sense. Some of X's wacky trade us "South Carolina" posts make more sense. Also the ACC adding West Virginia makes more sense than taking a Texas school. Your natural additions are West Virginia, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and of course Notre Dame but only because of their East Coast ties. Geographically they are Great Lakes.

I agree.

The ACC only goes west for Texas & only for the $. Truthfully, I would be happier with ND & 1 of WV, Cincinnati or UCONN. If the $ was right then all 3. Texas & Oklahoma make the most sense in the SEC.

If the ACC is starting a network then it makes absolute sense to add Cincinnati and Connecticut two good markets, and hold the West Virginia spot for Notre Dame's full inclusion, or the break up of the Big 12 depending upon which one comes first.

Ohio, Connecticut, Indiana plus Catholics everywhere, and a strong regional sports brand in West Virginia all would help.

Plus if the ACC shores up and makes a run with it of the ACCN it will only encourage the SEC even more to do what it takes with the Big 12. I'll bet with ESPN's interest in the state of Texas that wheels have and are being greased to facilitate Texas, another Texas school, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to the SEC. If West Virginia could find a home in the ACC upon a break up it might encourage the SEC to think about moving to 20 and taking Kansas and either Kansas State or Iowa State to get there. Then if my thinking about the PAC is correct in that they would love to get into the Texas market Texas Tech and T.C.U. head to the PAC quite possibly with U.N.L.V. and another. If that scenario looked likely I think the school traveling with Texas would be Baylor.

There is some protectionism for Baylor in the state since it was the state's first University (their oldest institution of higher learning). So if we had to have a third Texas school and Tech had a P5 home waiting on them they make sense.

But if we could work that deal to just pick up Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State then Kansas looks realistic and 18 would be the stopping point.

If the $ was there then I would be ecstatic but, as you have stated before, we are moving away from the market model & towards the content model. Therefore, to satisfy FSU & Clemson financially then the ACC will need to bring in more brands for content. Anything less than that will likely keep the ACC unstable. You could say that the SEC wouldn't have a spot for them but then that would only invite the B1G. The ACC needs Texas to get their financials close to the SEC & B1G. As much as I would loathe playing in a western division in the ACC I think it would be necessary to keep the ACC intact. There could also be some recruiting advantages to it as well but we would need Miami there with us.
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2017 09:26 AM by Lenvillecards.)
04-23-2017 09:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #28
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-23-2017 09:25 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:49 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 12:42 PM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:49 AM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 10:11 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  To have a successful conference network in Mexico I think you will need a quality soccer & baseball product first & foremost. Both the SEC & the ACC being strong in both of these sports I think would bold well for their networks as both conferences reach into strong Hispanic/Latino populations here in America, south Florida for the ACC & Texas for the SEC, for recruiting.

(If the ACCN is a success.)

I don't know how women's soccer will pan out in a macho society. As far as baseball is concerned the SEC is much deeper and has the much longer history of being so. Until Virginia won the title a couple of years ago it had been since the 50's that the ACC even had a title in the sport. And again, since we are discussing Mexico I'm sure their interest would be in Texas schools since many of those programs have Hispanics on the teams. Miami would be, perhaps, the best draw for the ACC, but then Cubans and Mexicans don't always mesh. The two cultures, and even the Spanish spoken, varies to a large degree between the two.

But Lenville, lacrosse aside, the SEC and ACC do share many of the same interests and more of the same history and culture than either of us do with another conference. So if the ACCN is successful then a blending of the two for future involvement in Mexico might be in the offing.

My main point about Texas schools in the ACC is that it has never made business or geographical sense. Some of X's wacky trade us "South Carolina" posts make more sense. Also the ACC adding West Virginia makes more sense than taking a Texas school. Your natural additions are West Virginia, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and of course Notre Dame but only because of their East Coast ties. Geographically they are Great Lakes.

I agree.

The ACC only goes west for Texas & only for the $. Truthfully, I would be happier with ND & 1 of WV, Cincinnati or UCONN. If the $ was right then all 3. Texas & Oklahoma make the most sense in the SEC.

If the ACC is starting a network then it makes absolute sense to add Cincinnati and Connecticut two good markets, and hold the West Virginia spot for Notre Dame's full inclusion, or the break up of the Big 12 depending upon which one comes first.

Ohio, Connecticut, Indiana plus Catholics everywhere, and a strong regional sports brand in West Virginia all would help.

Plus if the ACC shores up and makes a run with it of the ACCN it will only encourage the SEC even more to do what it takes with the Big 12. I'll bet with ESPN's interest in the state of Texas that wheels have and are being greased to facilitate Texas, another Texas school, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to the SEC. If West Virginia could find a home in the ACC upon a break up it might encourage the SEC to think about moving to 20 and taking Kansas and either Kansas State or Iowa State to get there. Then if my thinking about the PAC is correct in that they would love to get into the Texas market Texas Tech and T.C.U. head to the PAC quite possibly with U.N.L.V. and another. If that scenario looked likely I think the school traveling with Texas would be Baylor.

There is some protectionism for Baylor in the state since it was the state's first University (their oldest institution of higher learning). So if we had to have a third Texas school and Tech had a P5 home waiting on them they make sense.

But if we could work that deal to just pick up Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State then Kansas looks realistic and 18 would be the stopping point.

If the $ was there then I would be ecstatic but, as you have stated before, we are moving away from the market model & towards the content model. Therefore, to satisfy FSU & Clemson financially then the ACC will need to bring in more brands for content. Anything less than that will likely keep the ACC unstable. You could say that the SEC wouldn't have a spot for them but then that would only invite the B1G. The ACC needs Texas to get their financials close to the SEC & B1G. As much as I would loathe playing in a western division in the ACC I think it would be necessary to keep the ACC intact. There could also be some recruiting advantages to it as well but we would need Miami there with us.

Lenville the SEC isn't going to rob the ACC. ESPN won't permit it. But should the ACC start to get raided ESPN would shelter those schools which they wanted to keep full access to in the SEC.

The ACC wants a network. And while we are leaving the market model, markets are still necessary for the formation of a network. Plus Lenville the ACC is not in position to raid the SEC or Big 10 nor are you in position to outbid them for Texas or Oklahoma or any other top brand. Texas might come to the ACC if you offer up enough slots for their buddies, but to do that would be to dilute any potential profits you might gain from the new network. Texas would add maybe 3 million in value to the ACC. That in part would come from content games against F.S.U., Clemson, North Carolina, Virginia Tech, Notre Dame and perhaps your Cardinals. But never would they play all of those in a season. They might play 4 of them. Their value is maximized with brand on brand games. And if they come as a partial they won't add enough to make buddies worthwhile. And since they won't come without buddies should they join in full they will earn ESPN less in content value than ESPN could get from their placement in the SEC.

Nothing you do can catch you up to the SEC or Big 10. The chance to do that was in 2010-11 when you could have landed Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Notre Dame as your four to get to 16 if you had given up N.C. State and Virginia Tech. Your old core stopped it, and pissed off a great many folks. Folks in the SEC, folks in Texas, and folks at ESPN have not forgotten. That move would have placed you on fairly equal footing with the Big 10 and SEC. The SEC will have one of Texas and Oklahoma if not both. But either way not even Texas can catch you up now.

And remember this, no matter what their history has been, an ever increasing secular world cares less and less about Notre Dame. In just a few more years all they will be is a small private school in Northern Indiana. Other than one over hyped year to put them in position to be curb stomped by Alabama they've been nothing for nearly 3 decades. As lacrosse and basketball buddies they are fine. But their football days are in the past. N.D. will eventually be a liability to the ACC.

Texas had 3 essential rivals in football. Arkansas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma are the games their fans want most to see. Should they be able to bring another Texas school with them to the SEC and join Oklahoma there and once again add Arkansas and A&M as an annual game that enticement along with the maximized revenue will probably be the course they choose. If so ESPN will not stand in the way. While schools love academic associations they are also smart enough to know that (a) those associations don't get you an AAU membership, and that (b) if you already have an AAU membership they can't prevent you from getting grants, and can't add grants to you, and can't keep you from sharing a grant with any school that wants to share one with you. That part has and will continue to be the hot air that many blow. But most importantly Texas will move to a conference that their fans can easily access, and where their minor sports don't have to max out the budget in travel. And that last part trumps everything else.

If the ACC wants to survive it needs to build up its inventory with what it can afford, and schools that can afford to play in it. Cincinnati and Connecticut are two such schools and West Virginia is the best of the three in revenue sports. Then you need to put the danged Irish to the question. If they will not commit to a date to join in full cut them loose. You'll be happier in the end, and smarter than the old Big East for having done so.
04-23-2017 10:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
murrdcu Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,974
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 144
I Root For: Arkansas
Location:
Post: #29
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-22-2017 04:56 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:05 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.

There are no accidents when something as large as a network puts this much focus in one area. Remember Corso insinuated that in 5 years Texas and Oklahoma would make a move like A&M's. Put the SECN in Mexico, convert the LHN Dallas studio into a bilingual transmission site the SEC's western half, develop some in state pull for bowl access and tourism, give OU and UT a travel selection to go with them and you have fairly well sewed this up.

For those who say we don't need two unnecessary mouths to feed, they just need to remember that if we go that route we are claiming two top 10 brands, two historic programs, and those they are bringing with them aren't exactly slouches either. The average of the 4 still increase our MEAN Gross Revenue, only negligibly affect our attendance numbers and those may go up in the SEC, and they likely add enough content to bump us close to the 50 million per school payout range on TV revenue.

So if that is what it takes to close the deal and remove the only two players from the table that could give a competitor a leg up on us, then it's well worth it. And if UT helps the penetration into the Mexico market it could pay dividends that push us beyond 50.

"So let it be written. So let it be done!"

You're talking about possibly have three conference networks running at once; SECN, SEC Deportes, and you could create a SEC West channel to provide more coverage of content on the other side of the Mississippi. I think having another channel that has content not so Alabama centric could do wonders for other SEC viewers.
04-23-2017 12:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,246
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7943
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #30
RE: ESPNU and the SECN To Launch on TotalPlay in Mexico!
(04-23-2017 12:38 PM)murrdcu Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:56 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 04:05 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  Another interesting note on the TX market...

Apparently ESPN has purchased the Miami Beach Bowl and is moving it to Frisco, TX. That's outside of Dallas and it will be played at an MLS stadium.

If ESPN is really going full force after the Mexican market then it would make sense that they want to improve content in the state of TX. Texas, being on the border with Mexico and more likely to have a Mexican population as opposed to Florida, would be a nice location for any event in which the network would like to enhance exposure.

Or it could be totally unrelated. I'm just thinking out loud.

There are no accidents when something as large as a network puts this much focus in one area. Remember Corso insinuated that in 5 years Texas and Oklahoma would make a move like A&M's. Put the SECN in Mexico, convert the LHN Dallas studio into a bilingual transmission site the SEC's western half, develop some in state pull for bowl access and tourism, give OU and UT a travel selection to go with them and you have fairly well sewed this up.

For those who say we don't need two unnecessary mouths to feed, they just need to remember that if we go that route we are claiming two top 10 brands, two historic programs, and those they are bringing with them aren't exactly slouches either. The average of the 4 still increase our MEAN Gross Revenue, only negligibly affect our attendance numbers and those may go up in the SEC, and they likely add enough content to bump us close to the 50 million per school payout range on TV revenue.

So if that is what it takes to close the deal and remove the only two players from the table that could give a competitor a leg up on us, then it's well worth it. And if UT helps the penetration into the Mexico market it could pay dividends that push us beyond 50.

"So let it be written. So let it be done!"

You're talking about possibly have three conference networks running at once; SECN, SEC Deportes, and you could create a SEC West channel to provide more coverage of content on the other side of the Mississippi. I think having another channel that has content not so Alabama centric could do wonders for other SEC viewers.

Murrdcu we have 3 channels now, but just two that ever get used. If we took in the LHN as the West channel and used that studio to that purpose and if we remain in two divisions it would be simple to have (other than news & specials) two different programming lineups with each being dedicated to the schools of that division. It would be huge for driving even more interest among the rest of the programs. But it would also be major from a regional advertising perspective. Both channels could have separate regional advertising and double their spots for national advertising.

Let's say we were to move to 18 and three divisions of 6, then you could utilize that third channel and make the regional advertising even more specific and triple the national slots.

Right now ESPN is paying for 5 channels and really only utilizing 3 with regards to LHN/ SEC / & Spanish language broadcasts. Even if the SEC moved to 24 we could have 4 divisional channels and a Spanish channel which weekly could cherry pick the games they wanted most to broadcast. It's still a bonanza.

The package would be a sports watcher's gold mine.

Every Saturday in the Fall I'm wondering why my dedicated 3rd SEC channel isn't showing me something?
04-23-2017 01:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.