(04-18-2017 12:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 12:02 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:43 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's actually an article they do each year on women who use their celebrity for charitable and worthy causes.

Sorry that bothers you guys so much.

Red Herring alert, it is the ugly horse face mug bro.

Sorry...I guess I missed all the other threads about magazine covers with women in unattractive (to you) poses.

Are you the poster that thinks Chelsea and Debbie Wasserman are good looking, is that you?

DWS has nice tubes...other than that, I was being sarcastic in my praise.

Chelsea can be alright in the right pose.

Regardless, I still maintain that there isn't a one of you that would kick either of them out of bed if you had the chance and no one would find out about it.

They would have to pay me though.

(04-18-2017 11:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I don't know. The right amount of alcohol and darkness, I'd think about letting her hold my hand.

cgi and some brewskis....wunderbar

I'm amazed someone on this board was scoping out the Power of Women NY edition of Variety.

Did she not take her husband's name?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

You can see how much they had to photoshop to get her to even look that bad.

(04-18-2017 01:27 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  You can see how much they had to photoshop to get her to even look that bad.

Is this like The Producers, where they are trying to kill their own product by making it too horrible to buy for the insurance money?

People still buy magazines?

(04-18-2017 03:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  People still buy magazines?

Of course. We still have doctors offices and such. Just today I was reading a Libturd mag. Good thing they're available so I can see how hopeless celebrities are in Unholywood.

Give her some oats, and maybe an apple, and she will love you long time.

(04-18-2017 11:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's actually an article they do each year on women who use their celebrity for charitable and worthy causes.

Sorry that bothers you guys so much.

Does not bother me at all. Im a bit surprised that she allowed that pic to be used. It is not particularly becoming.

(04-19-2017 05:34 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's actually an article they do each year on women who use their celebrity for charitable and worthy causes.
Sorry that bothers you guys so much.

Does not bother me at all. Im a bit surprised that she allowed that pic to be used. It is not particularly becoming.

It's extremely difficult to take a becoming photo of Chelsea.

(04-19-2017 06:11 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-19-2017 05:34 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's actually an article they do each year on women who use their celebrity for charitable and worthy causes.
Sorry that bothers you guys so much.

Does not bother me at all. Im a bit surprised that she allowed that pic to be used. It is not particularly becoming.

It's extremely difficult to take a becoming photo of Chelsea.

Cover her up entirely in Clinton Foundation cash. It worked for her husband.

Chelsea Clinton's Cheerleading Cult

Quote:How thirsty does Variety look begging readers to join it in doing high V cheerleading moves for Chelsea Clinton?

Thirstier than an ultra-marathoner lost in Death Valley in mid-July.

Hyping the entertainment magazine's latest cover, Co-Editor-in-Chief Claudia Eller gushed this week, "How cool does Chelsea Clinton look on our Power of Women, NY, cover?"

Welcome to the liberal media's manufacturing of "cool." Leather jacket? Check. Overzealous airbrushing? Check. Humanizing grin? Check. Democratic establishment pedigree? Checkity-check-check.

This is just the latest attempt by The Media Resistance to make Chelsea Clinton a thing. The same liberal lunatics in the press who rage about the Trump children's nepotistic privileges champion the "refreshingly outspoken" daughter of the Clinton dynasty -- who, at 37 years old, will receive a "Lifetime Impact" award from Variety on Friday for her "humanitarian work."

The honor comes during the same week that the Clinton Global Initiative cash machine officially shut down. Among the generous "humanitarian" projects of CGI's parent, the Clinton Foundation: chipping in a reported $3 million for Chelsea's wedding to another heir of Democratic corruptocrats, Marc Mezvinsky -- the newly jobless former hedge fund manager and son of convicted fraudster Edward Mezvinsky, a former Democratic congressman from Iowa.

Remember: The Clintons' own inner circle lambasted Chelsea's hubby for exploiting the Clinton Foundation and CGI to prop up his now-defunct hedge fund. The duo also siphoned off charitable donations to pay for "taxes on money from her parents" and expenses racked up to subsidize her "life for a decade," according to longtime Clinton aide Doug Band.

But I digress from the Cult of Chelsea Coolness. Shake those pompoms, propaganda media:

The New York Times lauded "Chelsea Clinton, Unbound," applauded her "confrontational tweeting" against President Trump and interviewed her about books for a series featuring successful authors -- after her most recent ghostwritten opus on global health care flopped like those famous Filipino divers on YouTube.

BuzzFeed and The Hill cover Chelsea as if she were a Kardashian. Politico also cooed over Chelsea's new "spicy, sarcastic online personality" on Twitter. Then the Beltway publication hailed her upcoming children's book, which opportunistically cribs left-wing feminist Sen. Elizabeth Warren's cri de coeur, "She Persisted."

The Huffington Post breathlessly reported on Chelsea's brave thoughts about breast-feeding and menstruation. She boldly asserted in a wellness article that we all need to "support" breast-feeding women and menstruating girls "by talking candidly" about them. OK then. Prepare the Nobel Prize nomination, stat!

Insipid platitudes deserve eye rolls, not gala celebrations. What independent "power of women" has Chelsea Clinton exercised, other than inheriting her father's name and what's left of her two-time-losing mother's political cache?

"Lifetime achievement"? She skated through college and pulled family strings to secure her short-lived, high-priced jobs in management consulting and media.

Those who know Chelsea Clinton best see her for what she is: a "spoiled brat," to quote Doug Band.

She is Bill Clinton without the charm, Hillary Clinton without the ruthlessness and full Billary in her bottomless well of inflated entitlement and ideological hackery.

The ineluctable drive to prop up Chelsea Clinton is textbook fake news. The only constituency rooting for her to run for political office is the Hollywood-media complex, which is desperately trying to squeeze blood from a rotten turnip.

How uncool is that?

https://townhall.com/columnists/michelle...t-n2315029

(04-18-2017 12:47 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I don't know. The right amount of alcohol and darkness, I'd think about letting her hold my hand.

cgi and some brewskis....wunderbar

Maybe I could get pictures and blackmail her for millions. Maybe make her and her husband secret donors to Southern Miss athletics for life as well...

For those reasons I might would think about taking one for the team.

(04-18-2017 11:06 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

It's been bothering me all afternoon trying to figure out where the inspiration for this picture came from. It hit me a little bit ago......

(04-19-2017 06:11 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-19-2017 05:34 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's actually an article they do each year on women who use their celebrity for charitable and worthy causes.
Sorry that bothers you guys so much.

Does not bother me at all. Im a bit surprised that she allowed that pic to be used. It is not particularly becoming.

It's extremely difficult to take a becoming photo of Chelsea.

braille would be mandatory for that to happen...

(04-19-2017 08:09 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-18-2017 11:06 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

It's been bothering me all afternoon trying to figure out where the inspiration for this picture came from. It hit me a little bit ago......

don't forget about these fellers....