(03-29-2017 09:58 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:25 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://thehill.com/homenews/administrati...anka-trump

Cosmo found a Republican to criticize Ivanka. I guess she wants to get more gigs at CNN. And not surprisingly Planned Parenthood did.

Can anyone imagine Jenna and Barbara getting this type of criticism? The whole crux of the article is nuts. Ivanka, whose views aren't totally known, criticized because she isn't turning her dad into a liberal Democrat?

Banana Republic.

Jenna and Barbara (the younger) were kids with no influence. Ivanka is a different situation completely. DJT appointed her to a clearance approved position. Along with her husband. Ivanka is completely fair game. So is her husband.

DJT, Jr, and Eric are also fair game, as they are engaged in business activities not completely transparent and are acting as adult political proxies for their father

Melania is ALSO fair game within limits. She is costing the taxpayers....Bigly.

Tiffany is NOT fair game. Barron is NOT fair game.

---

I find it ironic that the biggest problem many had with HRC was that there was nepotism claims (and fair owes). But Trump....is moving to a full scale banana republic.

Hillary and her coronation was the definition of banana republic. Trump is not anointing Melania as the next president with him as first spouse. And there were tons of problems with Hillary besides her spouse. That was one of the least of her issues.

If Ivanka says something, she is fair game for the press. But the things they are attacking her for are just ridiculous. And personally accosting her is way over the line.

Nobody has ever criticized President's living arrangements before. So no, its just hypocritical bs. And much of the cost is because the Democrats are using so much hate speech and encouraging, or at least condoning, violence against Republicans. Obama and Clinton could shut down the violent acts with a simple statement. Their silence speaks volumes. Hillary even hired people to incite violence.

She does not have to say anything. She's working in this administration!

(03-29-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

She does not have to say anything. She's working in this administration!

Another example of the insanity. GASP! She is associated with President Trump!!!

(03-29-2017 11:32 AM)bullet Wrote:  Nobody has ever criticized President's living arrangements before. So no, its just hypocritical bs.

Show me one example of where this arrangement has happened before please.

(03-29-2017 11:39 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

She does not have to say anything. She's working in this administration!

Another example of the insanity. GASP! She is associated with President Trump!!!

Dude...get real. She has an office in the WH and is getting full security clearance!

Butt salve, aisle 3.

(03-29-2017 09:45 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 09:24 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Tiffany, Trump's other daughter.

Yeah,I know. I just find it interesting that when O was in office family members were supposedly off limits but now that he's not, not so much. Pure hypocrisy I find amusing, that's all. I refrain from criticizing any family members seeing as how they aren't POTUS.

It's a little different given the age of trumps kids and their involvement in the administration.

(03-29-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

She does not have to say anything. She's working in this administration!

so what?

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(03-29-2017 12:43 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

She does not have to say anything. She's working in this administration!

so what?

So....she's a part of the administration. Therefore, she's free to be criticized for it. Of course good luck finding out what she's actually doing with these modern day Romanov's.

(03-29-2017 08:57 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:53 AM)VA49er Wrote:  They hate them because they are beautiful.

low Tom. anybody can find a bad picture of somebody. Funny thats the ONE you pick out of hundreds that pop up on google. Same **** all the other liberals do when they bring her up. She is actually very pretty IMHO. I wonder how your wife and daughters compare.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(03-29-2017 12:52 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:57 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:53 AM)VA49er Wrote:  They hate them because they are beautiful.

low Tom. anybody can find a bad picture of somebody. Funny thats the ONE you pick out of hundreds that pop up on google. Same **** all the other liberals do when they bring her up. She is actually very pretty IMHO. I wonder how your wife and daughters compare.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

I guess I missed your criticizing the other poster for the bad pictures of Michelle, Hillary, Maddow, DWS and Dunham, et. al..

Grow up, kiddo.

(03-29-2017 01:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 12:52 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:57 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-29-2017 08:53 AM)VA49er Wrote:  They hate them because they are beautiful.

low Tom. anybody can find a bad picture of somebody. Funny thats the ONE you pick out of hundreds that pop up on google. Same **** all the other liberals do when they bring her up. She is actually very pretty IMHO. I wonder how your wife and daughters compare.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

I guess I missed your criticizing the other poster for the bad pictures of Michelle, Hillary, Maddow, DWS and Dunham, et. al..

Your post of Tiffany was brought in out of nowhere. Nobody mentioned Dems in this thread until yiu. As far as Tiffany goes she has been pretty apolitical, nothing like the women you mention here.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Ivanka isn't even getting paid. Bobby Kennedy was in the cabinet. But Democrats don't mind hypocrisy. This article compares Ivanka to Obama family friend Valerie Jarrett.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/pos...7813a3d7b7

"...I’m reminded of when a foreign head of government for whom I’ve done some work met me for dinner a few years ago in Georgetown to reflect on the takeaways from his official visit to Washington. As soon as we sat down, the first words out of his mouth were, “Who is Valerie Jarrett?” He had just left a meeting at the White House with President Barack Obama, but Jarrett did most of the talking. Let’s not forget how much power she wielded during the Obama years. When she wasn’t happy, Jarrett felt emboldened to speak up — even to a foreign ally. She read him the riot act. You didn’t hear liberals criticize Obama for having his soulmate close by. And in the era of the modern family, where liberals say that anything goes, Jarrett was more a member of the family than a professional staffer. And just to prove the point, don’t forget that she has actually moved in with the Obamas in their house in Kalorama.

By all accounts, Ivanka Trump will be more cordial and less presumptuous than Valerie Jarrett ever was. She is an accomplished businesswoman with the acumen needed to advise and operate among leaders of high office. Yet liberals can’t come to grips with Trump’s growing role. They are all for empowering women, but only if it’s done by Democrats for Democrats. As usual, their hypocrisy is showing. We can only imagine the swooning, fawning and celebrating that would have greeted Chelsea Clinton if her mother had not dropped the ball. The left should get over the fact that Trump is being brought on as an assistant to the president. The president should be able to work with whoever he wants."

She shouldn't be advising a conservative President.

So there's no problem in that regard.

She's going to be pushing left. And just setting in daddy's lap is enough to give rise to his hard consideration.

Really?