(03-16-2017 08:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I distinctly remember a thread where Bison alluded to the fact that she was a she.

Same here, she or he is a piece of work.

(03-16-2017 09:11 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  OK fine, you guys are right. I did admit it, in a thread on here several months ago.

Here is the link: http://csnbbs.com/thread-785281.html

wrong thread. That one simply redirects people to your home page.

(03-16-2017 11:35 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 08:11 PM)Phlipper33 Wrote:  I don't see it happening for places like stadiums where you have huge crowds though.

You haven't seen large banks of portapoties at large public events?? I've seen it quite often, and they work very well.

Yes, I have seen large banks of port-a-potties in parking lots at large events. I'm a Rangers season ticket holder and they have port-a-potties in the parking lot throughout the entire season. There are frequently lines to use these. Inside the stadium though, they have men's restrooms with some stalls and many urinals. It would cost them a ton to replace all those urinals with stalls. Each stall takes up more space than a urinal, so there would be fewer spots for men to use the restroom, leading to longer lines.

Some men may not shut the door behind them when urinating, but others do. Even if it only adds 1 second per person, that can have a legitimate impact when everyone rushes to the restroom in between innings and quarters and at the end of the game.

The Rangers have announced plans to build a new ballpark, and I haven't seen the bathroom plans for that stadium. When they do design the restrooms I'm hoping they copy plans from Buccee's.

(03-16-2017 09:48 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 09:11 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  OK fine, you guys are right. I did admit it, in a thread on here several months ago.

Here is the link: http://csnbbs.com/thread-785281.html

wrong thread. That one simply redirects people to your home page.

If I remember right, someone asked for a woman's opinion of something (maybe abortion) and she spoke up that she was a woman. Could be wrong though.

(03-16-2017 05:29 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 10:07 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 10:00 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 09:58 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  It's amazing what a law designed to flex nuts ended up doing.

Still placing the blame at the state of NC and not the city of Charlotte, I see.

Yes I am. They didn't have to respond to what Charlotte did and if it weren't politically advantageous they would have left it alone.

A big thing Pat McCrory had been saying was, "let these things be settled by the courts". Why couldn't the Charlotte law be settled by the courts? If it would've been struck down, there would've been no need for HB2 and none of this crap would've ever happened.

So City law trumps State law? Huh, I thought it went Federal>State>City/Town/County? Now your telling me that if Charlotte says the State of North Carolina is henceforth to be called Poopy Face Tomato Nose, that NC has no standing to tell them no?

I think you need to direct your outrage where it should've been all along...at the City of Charlotte.

Well that example wouldn't have been able to go into effect. The state name of North Carolina is in the state's constitution. You wouldn't even need to tell them no.