MBB and Competitive Excellence
It is my opinion that W&M (the school and/or the Athletic Department) does not value the Men’s Basketball program, certainly not to the extent that I do. As a result, we under-invest in the program and our recent success has come despite, rather than as a result of, the infrastructure put in place by the school.
In FY 2013, W&M spending on basketball was significantly less than Hofstra, Northeastern, JMU, Drexel and Charleston. While the UNC-W budget was comparable, I have no doubt that the beginning of its Keatts era was preceded by a significant boost in their spending as well.
As I think a part of the Competitive Excellence exercise, it was determined that a significant boost in W&M spending on basketball is required for us to compete for championships. Basically that would mean a 50% increase in operating budget from 2015 to 2020 (NOT adjusted for inflation), not considering the capital budget which is where a practice facility would be included. Nor is it a very ambitious list since it addressed recruiting and coaches salaries but not buying a decent OOC schedule, whether that be OOC home games or pre- or post-season tournaments.
(One part of that goal has already been met: the increased funding for summer school scholarships. However, I understand that objective was met by the efforts of boosters outside the College, not by the College itself.)
Even worse, that was a wish list from the basketball program, not a commitment from the College.
Here is the key paragraph from the Report of the Committee on Competitive Excellence:
"Each sport program – its coaches, alumnae or alumni, and friends – must be aware of its spending and facility needs, and, therefore, the fundraising goals to provide its respective operational necessities. The athletic director should outline targets for new resources that need to be raised above and beyond current giving levels to the programs by area."
I am aware of no plan to achieve greater funding for the basketball program. I see no timetable with measurable benchmarks to motivate increased giving. I have heard no feedback on progress against our goals.
If such a plan exists, it has been poorly communicated because I am a prime target that should have been approached to increase my (small) contributions.
If it does not, its absence is telling.
I believe we need an organized basketball boosters entity to work with the College to establish goals and work to achieve them. I hear at various times that the “boosters” have addressed a problem or that “seven or eight basketball alumni” will fund a trip. This ad-hoc approach is no way to establish a winning program.
I believe there is untapped financial support for the MBB program that is waiting for clear direction from the College and a commitment that increased funding for basketball does indeed go to basketball.
|