If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

(01-10-2017 10:13 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  So the morons at Huff-Po still don't know what a federal republic is?

They, like lots of dumbasses, still probably thing the US has a national popular vote.

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

(01-11-2017 10:11 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

We won.

The purge will begin soon.

It's coming.

Tommy boy, Trump won. Your b#tch lost. Live with it.

(01-11-2017 10:11 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

He didn't even campaign in California and New York. Clearly Trump out campaigned Hillary in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and the results were overwhelmingly pro-Trump.

You're in denial obviously, but that's expected from a losing party.

(01-11-2017 11:16 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 10:11 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

He didn't even campaign in California and New York. Clearly Trump out campaigned Hillary in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and the results were overwhelmingly pro-Trump.

You're in denial obviously, but that's expected from a losing party.

You have a funny definition of 'overwhelmingly'.. Trump didn't get a majority of votes in ANY of those states except Ohio..52.5% voted against him in Michigan...51.2% voted against him in Penn, 53% voted against him in Wisconsin...51% in Florida...50.2 % in North Carolina, 52% in Arizona.....54% voted against him in Utah,

And he LOST the popular vote too. 54.5% of voters voted AGAINST him.

Your assertion that DJT overwhelmingly won the election is about as valid as the Electoral College declaring Alabama the National Champion.

(01-11-2017 10:11 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

What I find amusing is that aside from illegal immigration and the fact the man is a pig he is the most socially progressive candidate the GOP has run.

I rememeber when Bush was "the most anti-woman candidate ever", I remember when Romney was "the most anti-woman candidate ever", Heck I remember when "McCain's sexist comments" were a huge problem.

It's a well the left has went to, apparently, one time too many and it was the worst move you could have made against a guy once praised by Jessie Jackson for his efforts for minorities and his 1986 Ellis Island Medal of Honor (which hillary also won in 1999).

The only people who bought the "trump is racist" are those who see every GOP candidate as "the most racist, anti-woman, anti immigrant candidate ever".

I mean trump is a cad, but one can be a cad and not a sexist. Trump is vulgar but one can be vulgar and not a racist.

If he governs well and all boats rise he may have a chance of reelection.

(01-11-2017 11:29 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 11:16 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 10:11 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 08:21 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  If the popular vote elected the President, Trump would've campaigned in heavier blue states and bigger cities. Still would've won.

No he wouldn't because his entire campaign was built on campaigning against the majority of Americans that don't like him.

He didn't even campaign in California and New York. Clearly Trump out campaigned Hillary in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania and the results were overwhelmingly pro-Trump.

You're in denial obviously, but that's expected from a losing party.

You have a funny definition of 'overwhelmingly'.. Trump didn't get a majority of votes in ANY of those states except Ohio..52.5% voted against him in Michigan...51.2% voted against him in Penn, 53% voted against him in Wisconsin...51% in Florida...50.2 % in North Carolina, 52% in Arizona.....54% voted against him in Utah,

And he LOST the popular vote too. 54.5% of voters voted AGAINST him.

Your assertion that DJT overwhelmingly won the election is about as valid as the Electoral College declaring Alabama the National Champion.

He won those states, idiot. More of those states voted against Hillary. He had more votes than HRC in those states. End of story.

The popular vote means absolutely nothing. It always has and always will.

Trump won overwhelmingly in the category that matters.

It is like this in a football game:

Trump 31 Clinton 14

First downs: Trump 15 Clinton 18

Trump won in the only category that matters.

The liberals' whining reminds me of Pop Warner's complaining after the 1925 Rose Bowl in which his Stanford team outgained and had more first downs than Notre Dame but they lost 27-10 because of turnovers. He wanted points given for first downs and years. Rockne had a great reply to him.

Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

(01-11-2017 12:18 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

Dunno about that. There's still people convinced Bush stole it in 2000.

Just glad someone beat Bama.

(01-11-2017 12:18 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

LOL. Right after the alt right moves on from the CIVIL WAR loss 150 years ago.

(01-11-2017 12:35 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:18 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

LOL. Right after the alt right moves on from the CIVIL WAR loss 150 years ago.

The Tardis is starting to get out of hand Doctor!

(01-11-2017 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:35 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:18 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

LOL. Right after the alt right moves on from the CIVIL WAR loss 150 years ago.

The Tardis is starting to get out of hand Doctor!

Yeah, no idea what the heck he's spinning now.

(01-11-2017 12:37 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:36 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:35 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(01-11-2017 12:18 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Time for some folks to move along in the grief process. Can't hang out in denial forever.

LOL. Right after the alt right moves on from the CIVIL WAR loss 150 years ago.

The Tardis is starting to get out of hand Doctor!

Yeah, no idea what the heck he's spinning now.

If all "racists" in the 1860's had fought for the Confederacy, there would have never been a war in the first place.

(01-10-2017 10:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Roll Tide!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-s-m...78158.html

Those two teams played a game, that had a particular way to score, predetermined before hand. They both new and understood how it worked. The team with the highest score wins. As it turns out, Alabama had the ball in possession longer than Clemson...does that give Alabama the right to claim the title based on time of possession?

So now, how does Huffpo and Tom's stupidity really relate to this situation?

Maybe this post will explain how the election went. Trump won the game and Killary got the Participation Trophy. Plus, there's more, Killary also won the Moral Victory Award.

Now, why are they still angry? Beats me.