(01-02-2017 10:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I believe the CIA and FBI and the 27 other organizations that say it was likely the russians.

That's fine... They also said Hussein had active WMD programs, I got suckered into believing them then.

That's why I want to see some proof now.

Quote:As for the grooming? How exactly was he grooming him and how much time took place between the time he was grooming the kid and when he molested him?

There is a report that he was his teacher, he was his mentor, and he took a role helping him when he came out as gay.

That's a shaq load more detail than is in the report released by the CIA and other agencies about Russia / Hacking.

When you call for detail on one then you can call for detail on theo other without looking like a hack.

(01-02-2017 10:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I believe the CIA and FBI and the 27 other organizations that say it was likely the russians.

The number who have said sorta, kinda, maybe, but not exactly that is one. The number who have provided any support for that is zero.

(01-02-2017 10:07 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(01-02-2017 10:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I believe the CIA and FBI and the 27 other organizations that say it was likely the russians.

That's fine... They also said Hussein had active WMD programs, I got suckered into believing them then.

That's why I want to see some proof now.

Quote:As for the grooming? How exactly was he grooming him and how much time took place between the time he was grooming the kid and when he molested him?

There is a report that he was his teacher, he was his mentor, and he took a role helping him when he came out as gay.

That's a shaq load more detail than is in the report released by the CIA and other agencies about Russia / Hacking.

When you call for detail on one then you can call for detail on theo other without looking like a hack.

Trump keeps saying that but it's not actually true.

The whole WMD's bull **** was created by the Bush administration. The CIA and FBI in fact were telling the administration that they didn't have enough evidence to prove Saddam had WMD's

(01-02-2017 10:19 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  The whole WMD's bull **** was created by the Bush administration. The CIA and FBI in fact were telling the administration that they didn't have enough evidence to prove Saddam had WMD's

Fake news fit, fake news..

https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/gene...1/iraq_wmd

"Based on tubes of the size Iraq is trying to acquire, a few tens of thousands of centrifuges would be capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a couple of weapons per year."

"In the absence of inspectors, Baghdad's already considerable ability to work on prohibited programs without risk of discovery has increased, and there is substantial evidence that Iraq is reconstituting prohibited programs."

"Iraq has not accounted for 15,000 artillery rockets that in the past were its preferred means for delivering nerve agents, nor has it accounted for about 550 artillery shells filled with mustard agent."

--

The 2002 CIA report certainly indicated that it was very likely Iraq was pursuing WMD's.

Once again, you're refusal to read reports and trust what politicians or media people say is why fitfails happen so often.

--

Now this 2002 CIA report has a shaq load more details, specifics, and reference evidence than the report just released by the Obama administration.

So why is it you trust one and not the other?

For my part I think it's very likely Bush pressured the CIA to say what they said just as I beleive Obama just did the same thing.

(01-02-2017 10:32 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  So why is it you trust one and not the other?

Party over country.

(12-29-2016 10:55 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Guessing Satan is shoving a red hot poker up their rear ends right now.

http://www.startribune.com/case-file-sou...408560525/

You lost me at "his husband".

I went to throw up.