(01-03-2017 01:29 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I also believe schools shouldn't stop students from practicing their religion on their own time in school, it hurts no one.

So long as this practicing is a private activity, performed outside of class, of course that's fine.

Muslim prayer times, is an example off the top of my head.

(01-03-2017 01:54 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 01:29 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I also believe schools shouldn't stop students from practicing their religion on their own time in school, it hurts no one.

So long as this practicing is a private activity, performed outside of class, of course that's fine.

Muslim prayer times, is an example off the top of my head.

My post isn't saying that a student can't pray silently. That should always be allowed. Have you heard the saying that there's no atheist in a fox hole neither is there one before a test.

Fine, as long as it's not a distraction for the other students or the teacher. That's what I was getting at by the outside of class part.

(01-03-2017 02:05 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  Fine, as long as it's not a distraction for the other students or the teacher. That's what I was getting at by the outside of class part.

But in the same reasoning, teachers shouldn't be allowed to force feed socialist, Libturd ideas to their students either. Fair enough for you?

(01-03-2017 02:14 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  teachers shouldn't be allowed to force feed socialist ... ideas to their students either. Fair enough for you?

You were talking about religion before, now you switched to socio-economic terminology.

So no, I don't agree.


If you mean to protect your children from learning any idea that you disagree with/disapprove of/hate, you'll have to home school them. And you'll still fail.

(01-03-2017 02:16 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:14 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  teachers shouldn't be allowed to force feed socialist ... ideas to their students either. Fair enough for you?

You were talking about religion before, now you switched to socio-economic terminology.

To libturds, socialism is a religion.

(01-03-2017 02:16 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:14 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  teachers shouldn't be allowed to force feed socialist ... ideas to their students either. Fair enough for you?

You were talking about religion before, now you switched to socio-economic terminology.

So no, I don't agree.


If you mean to protect your children from learning any idea that you disagree with/disapprove of/hate, you'll have to home school them. And you'll still fail.

So wouldn't religion fall under this disagree paradigm? We disagree with/disaprove, blah, blah, blah. I'm not surprised you didn't like what I posted. You're a how can I say it, um, a Libturd, so I shouldn't be surprised you wouldn't like it.

(01-03-2017 02:29 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  To libturds, socialism is a religion.

Socialism is a religion to Libertarians????

(01-03-2017 02:37 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:29 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  To libturds, socialism is a religion.

Socialism is a religion to Libertarians????

See, I told you you were unteachable. We've explained already what a Libturd is. Ay ya yay, you are thick.

(01-03-2017 02:32 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  So wouldn't religion fall under this disagree paradigm?

I'm not trying to protect my children from religion, which is obvious from my previous posts on this thread.

I am trying to protect the secularity of public schools.

(01-03-2017 02:37 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:29 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  To libturds, socialism is a religion.

Socialism is a religion to Libertarians????

"If you confuse Libturds with libertarians.... you're probably a libturd. "

No one is confusing anything.

Everyone knows what a Libertarian is.

Your person insult against them ("libturds") is your own made-up word.

As a libertarian, I've never taken offense at "libutrds." I've always understood it to apply to liberals, not libertarians. I suppose that in the sense that I see libertarianism as classical liberalism, I might have some reason to be offended. But I don't think classical liberals are the liberals toward whom the term "libturds" is directed.

How about Liberalturds? Can't get any clearer with that.

No. I will not compromise my beliefs, it's Libturd for Liberal Turds. Get used to it.

(12-31-2016 08:05 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 03:21 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 02:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 01:52 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 02:31 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  So you do agree that Democrats don't hate Islam because they're too scared of it to hate it?

Or is it contrarian time in the nomad house?

No. The whole point of this thread was for one of you guys' regular messy circlejerks and we've been having too many of them. The premise is a strawman.

Judging by your sour posts the past two days you are in dire need of this

Nah. There was once a time when even our more conservative posters would call out dumb threads like this. Check out how okla's threads were received in the past.

Now just so we're clear, you're confirming your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

What?

(01-03-2017 03:31 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 08:05 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 03:21 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 02:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 01:52 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  No. The whole point of this thread was for one of you guys' regular messy circlejerks and we've been having too many of them. The premise is a strawman.

Judging by your sour posts the past two days you are in dire need of this

Nah. There was once a time when even our more conservative posters would call out dumb threads like this. Check out how okla's threads were received in the past.

Now just so we're clear, you're confirming your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

What?

And there you have it!

(01-03-2017 03:31 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 08:05 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 03:21 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 02:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 01:52 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  No. The whole point of this thread was for one of you guys' regular messy circlejerks and we've been having too many of them. The premise is a strawman.

Judging by your sour posts the past two days you are in dire need of this

Nah. There was once a time when even our more conservative posters would call out dumb threads like this. Check out how okla's threads were received in the past.

Now just so we're clear, you're confirming your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

What?

To refresh your memory, I asked this in response to you responding to me...

Quote:No. The whole point of this thread was for one of you guys' regular messy circlejerks and we've been having too many of them. The premise is a strawman.

While I run the risk of one of your usual denials, I really want to know what is it with you liberals and your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

The first part of the quote is from you. The second part is my response.

#blacklivesmatter.

Dems believe cops are anti-religion.

Democrats don't hate Islam because, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".

Islam attacks Christianity and traditional Western values, so the Democrats love Islam.

(01-03-2017 08:18 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 03:31 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 08:05 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 03:21 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 02:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Judging by your sour posts the past two days you are in dire need of this

Nah. There was once a time when even our more conservative posters would call out dumb threads like this. Check out how okla's threads were received in the past.

Now just so we're clear, you're confirming your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

What?

To refresh your memory, I asked this in response to you responding to me...

Quote:No. The whole point of this thread was for one of you guys' regular messy circlejerks and we've been having too many of them. The premise is a strawman.

While I run the risk of one of your usual denials, I really want to know what is it with you liberals and your fascination/obsession with men and their private parts?

The first part of the quote is from you. The second part is my response.

You guys really need to quit it with the spin job on this. You conservatives are the ones that started this whole "butt hurt" nonsense. All you need to do is just go back and look at the many threads posted by conservatives to see who has the male part fetishes. I joined this forum about 4 months ago and I was just dumbfounded at all of the butt hurt comments. I am still wondering why grown men are using this type of comment to express themselves.