Yes I decided in the PM conversation I had concerning the subject in mid-November that I was going to need to use it in December.

Newsflash for you.....you aren't the first one to get reported in my drive for equal application of the rules. You are, however, the first one to take it personal and get butthurt over it. Especially enough to hijack two threads now.

(12-13-2016 12:13 AM)john01992 Wrote:  the orginal "hijack when butthurt" was by the crybaby who bumped this thread.

How is exposing a totally incorrect statement "butthurt" or "hijacking"?

(12-13-2016 12:31 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes I decided in the PM conversation I had concerning the subject in mid-November that I was going to need to use it in December.

Newsflash for you.....you aren't the first one to get reported in my drive for equal application of the rules. You are, however, the first one to take it personal and get butthurt over it. Especially enough to hijack two threads now.

You don't even have a legitimate reason for being offended by the phrase Kap. You are only doing this to advance this petty BS. Some other poster reported and pissed you off so you take it out on me. Yet you then claim it's acceptable when others do it but unacceptable when I do it.

You do realize you have no right to preach "equal application of the rules" right? You lost the ability to do that when you stated Mach can use kap but I can't. The fact you keep ignoring this point validates it.

(12-13-2016 12:40 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-13-2016 12:31 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes I decided in the PM conversation I had concerning the subject in mid-November that I was going to need to use it in December.

Newsflash for you.....you aren't the first one to get reported in my drive for equal application of the rules. You are, however, the first one to take it personal and get butthurt over it. Especially enough to hijack two threads now.

You don't even have a legitimate reason for being offended by the phrase Kap. You are only doing this to advance this petty BS. Some other poster reported and pissed you off so you take it out on me. Yet you then claim it's acceptable when others do it but unacceptable when I do it.

You do realize you have no right to preach "equal application of the rules" right? You lost the ability to do that when you stated Mach can use kap but I can't. The fact you keep ignoring this point validates it.

Neither did the person who reported me. But by God I believe in rules so if that's the rule then it's going to be enforced. Sucks to be you I guess.

And while I don't particularly like nor agree with Machiavelli I do respect him because when he's wrong he admits it and he has shown to be both reasonable and cordial in the past. You haven't so there is zero respect there. He gets the benefit of the doubt and you don't. Again, sucks to be you I guess. Just like in the real world one has to earn the right to call someone by a nickname. He has and you haven't.

You have proven yourself to be nothing but a grade-A douchebag kap.

(12-13-2016 12:55 AM)john01992 Wrote:  You have proven yourself to be nothing but a grade-A douchebag kap.

(12-13-2016 09:00 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 11:39 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 11:35 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Seems some people just don't like being reminded they were DEAD WRONG.

I can admit I was wrong. there's a fine line between reminding me one time verse 35 times and failing to acknowledge that the end result was highly unexpected.

usm just comes off appearing pathetic, broken, and cynical over the whole thing.

He comes off as yanking your chain like a aircraft carrier anchored in a hurricane