Butler down 5 to Indiana State at half....

(12-07-2016 08:03 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  Butler down 5 to Indiana State at half....

Go Butler. Don't want to tarnish a potential big win.

We'd beat Butler by 20 tonight. We'll prob lose a heart breaker Saturday

ISU is decent and are playing at home. I do not see anyone on the Butler team they will be able to stay with Washington. The match up inside should favor us.

Butler looking like the team that was picked 6th in the big East

Jeeeez they look like a mid major. Getting out rebounded by ISU by 10!

So is Bird and Carl Nicks playing for the Sycamores tonight?

Bet Butler plays lights out Saturday. How it always seems to work.

Although UC should have a major advantage inside.

Well we should mop the court with Butler....ahhhh who am I kidding? Prob gonna get homered and Quad will see 12+ minutes of action

Down goes Butler. It was at ISU, but from what I saw, I was not very impressed with Butler.

Temple down 10 to GW. Under 8.

I'm afraid we're in a 2 bid league, boys...2 BIDS

(12-07-2016 09:05 PM)DownOnRohs Wrote:  Temple down 10 to GW. Under 8.

I'm afraid we're in a 2 bid league, boys...2 BIDS

Tulsa also losing to Illinois State at the half.

(12-07-2016 09:05 PM)DownOnRohs Wrote:  Temple down 10 to GW. Under 8.

I'm afraid we're in a 2 bid league, boys...2 BIDS

Yup. And what sucks is that everyone will be gunning for UC as a chance for a signature win, while UC won't really have a chance for a great win in conference.

Just win baby!

Xavier is losing again

Xavier drops second straight 68-66 to Colorado.

(12-07-2016 11:11 PM)bcat1997 Wrote:  Xavier drops second straight 68-66 to Colorado.

Good! Most times I want our opponents to win, but not XU. Glad to see them exposed as I couldn't figure out how they were considered top 10. Have a good feeling we get back on the winning track against them this season.

(12-07-2016 11:34 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:11 PM)bcat1997 Wrote:  Xavier drops second straight 68-66 to Colorado.

Good! Most times I want our opponents to win, but not XU. Glad to see them exposed as I couldn't figure out how they were considered top 10. Have a good feeling we get back on the winning track against them this season.

I thought it was a Federally mandated rule at this point that we lose to XU?

(12-08-2016 07:15 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:34 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:11 PM)bcat1997 Wrote:  Xavier drops second straight 68-66 to Colorado.

Good! Most times I want our opponents to win, but not XU. Glad to see them exposed as I couldn't figure out how they were considered top 10. Have a good feeling we get back on the winning track against them this season.

I thought it was a Federally mandated rule at this point that we lose to XU?

We're allowed to win once every 3-4 years.

(12-08-2016 07:15 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:34 PM)BigDawg Wrote:  

(12-07-2016 11:11 PM)bcat1997 Wrote:  Xavier drops second straight 68-66 to Colorado.

Good! Most times I want our opponents to win, but not XU. Glad to see them exposed as I couldn't figure out how they were considered top 10. Have a good feeling we get back on the winning track against them this season.

I thought it was a Federally mandated rule at this point that we lose to XU?

Not exactly, the UC-XU provision was written in as part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership which the US was prepared to ratify. However, not all the countries that were part of the TPP were likely to approve the treaty. As it stands, the TPP is already dead in the water; the fact that our incoming president is opposed to the TPP has put the final nail in the coffin.