(10-13-2016 02:49 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  Trump supporters: I'm much more concerned about Bill Clinton's actions than Trump's words.
Trump victims come forward
Trump supporters: Those women are lying!

Clinton supporters:


Look there, mountains.



Nothing to see here, move along.

"Of course not. You ALWAYS make the most absurd assumptions out of what I said."

then stop having the most absurd comments. you always get involved trying to defend absurd notions yet complain when I call you out on it. even if you are just trying to clarify one aspect of this it's your fault for getting involved in the first place trying to defend a very absurd notion overall.

like seriously. it's not enough for you that basic common sense and math makes the OP an asinine comparison. then you jump on this stupid bandwagon nitpicking at photographic evidence not being enough to disprove it.

let me ask you something: how come we can make a blanket statement that defies all common sense and take that as fact but to disprove what we are apparently accept as fact for no reason needs not just beyond a reasonable doubt but beyond even an unreasonable doubt standard for you. your positions are routinely crazy and the only way you don't come off as crazy is if you do this just to nitpick at stupid pointless issues which makes you a troll.

so are you crazy or a troll? either way I really don't like you as a poster because (and we have had this conversation before) you seem to be one of those two things when you go on these tangents and it gets annoying. I've said this before if that's the style you are going to post with please stop responding to me because I'm not going to put a mod on ignore.

John0,

I hate to break it to you, but just because you disagree with what another person posts does not make that person or that post absurd, or asinine, or lacking in common sense, or failing to meet either a reasonable doubt or unreasonable doubt standard, or crazy, or stupid. Your faux outrage whenever anyone disagrees with you would be comical if it were not so sad.

If you want to disagree with what someone else has posted, why don't you start with some actual facts that support your position instead of merely launching a tirade of invective? You have all the ill-manners of Grad with none of the charm.

It's what he does in every thread.

it's especially bad when he puts in quotes, something never said.

poor reading comprehension is one thing... 'making up' comments is just a lie

(10-13-2016 04:18 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  John0,

I hate to break it to you, but just because you disagree with what another person posts does not make that person or that post absurd, or asinine, or lacking in common sense, or failing to meet either a reasonable doubt or unreasonable doubt standard, or crazy, or stupid. Your faux outrage whenever anyone disagrees with you would be comical if it were not so sad.

If you want to disagree with what someone else has posted, why don't you start with some actual facts that support your position instead of merely launching a tirade of invective? You have all the ill-manners of Grad with none of the charm.

is the entire issue not at its core asinine?

seriously we are arguing out of all the planes and we are talking thousands if not tens of thousands there is no way there could be a foldable arm rest? and showing pictures of foldable foldable armrests from the time period does not constitute proof? and all of this to justify a trivial aspect of a rape claim?

this is textbook asinine.

(10-13-2016 04:42 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  it's especially bad when he puts in quotes, something never said.

poor reading comprehension is one thing... 'making up' comments is just a lie

I guess owl is currently using the single brain cell you guys always seem to share.

but anyways I think you need to read up on the concept of paraphrasing.

and for the last time. I don't mind engaging with you, but when you resort to the philosophy of having a notion being taken as fact that has no evidence supporting it in the first place, but needs an overwhelming of standard of evidence to disprove it...it's agitating and annoying as hell.

seriously if you are going to allow no standards to prove something but tough standards to disprove it go do that with something else.

If you want to disagree with what someone else has posted, why don't you start with some actual facts that support your position instead of merely launching a tirade of invective?

because as I have clearly pointed out. facts don't seem to matter to you guys. it only matters when you are attacking my argument and not at all when you guys defend yours.