It just seems like that is their argument. They never dispute the authenticity of the emails, just the source. So any investigation looking for the leaks as proof of something criminal, better think again.
I think she has a winner on the legality of the obtainment.
Doesn't forgive her anything in the public eye but she doesn't give a phuk about you or I.

All the cold hearted Clinton's care about is the court of law. Her laughing at manipulating the court to get a rapist off after he raped a 12 yr old girl shows her heart. Zero remorse and would do it again in a minute.....for money.

I give Clinton a pass on the rape case. I know! I know! But, she did her job.

I don't think them blaming Russia was anything other than an attempt at political deflection.

(10-11-2016 07:41 PM)Dasville Wrote:  It just seems like that is their argument. They never dispute the authenticity of the emails, just the source. So any investigation looking for the leaks as proof of something criminal, better think again.
I think she has a winner on the legality of the obtainment.
Doesn't forgive her anything in the public eye but she doesn't give a phuk about you or I.

All the cold hearted Clinton's care about is the court of law. Her laughing at manipulating the court to get a rapist off after he raped a 12 yr old girl shows her heart. Zero remorse and would do it again in a minute.....for money.

I'll just leave this here regarding your accusation at HRC regarding the 12 year old girl... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-fr...-about-it/

Its pretty clear that Russia is involved in hacking HRC's support groups. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/27/us/pol....html?_r=0

Its also clear that some of the emails, if true, have been doctored.. http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-s...nik-508635

(10-11-2016 08:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 07:41 PM)Dasville Wrote:  It just seems like that is their argument. They never dispute the authenticity of the emails, just the source. So any investigation looking for the leaks as proof of something criminal, better think again.
I think she has a winner on the legality of the obtainment.
Doesn't forgive her anything in the public eye but she doesn't give a phuk about you or I.

All the cold hearted Clinton's care about is the court of law. Her laughing at manipulating the court to get a rapist off after he raped a 12 yr old girl shows her heart. Zero remorse and would do it again in a minute.....for money.

I'll just leave this here regarding your accusation at HRC regarding the 12 year old girl... http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-fr...-about-it/

Its pretty clear that Russia is involved in hacking HRC's support groups. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/27/us/pol....html?_r=0

Its also clear that some of the emails, if true, have been doctored.. http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-s...nik-508635

Is that the same N.Y. Times that gets their talking points from the DNC? You see, that's the trouble with these pesky email leaks. The media is essentially the DNC too.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Oh man. Now the whole media is the DNC. Please.

(10-11-2016 08:11 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Oh man. Now the whole media is the DNC. Please.

Look, if you call the Pope a leader of a bastard religion then it certainly not a stretch to think they will use the media. ALL of Them.

(10-11-2016 08:11 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Oh man. Now the whole media is the DNC. Please.

Never said the whole thing.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(10-11-2016 07:56 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I give Clinton a pass on the rape case. I know! I know! But, she did her job.

I don't think them blaming Russia was anything other than an attempt at political deflection.

Its a strawman designed to detract from the fact that they actually said and did those things.

OH MUH PUTIN!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(10-11-2016 08:19 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-11-2016 07:56 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I give Clinton a pass on the rape case. I know! I know! But, she did her job.

I don't think them blaming Russia was anything other than an attempt at political deflection.

Its a strawman designed to detract from the fact that they actually said and did those things.

Yep. When you can't defend, deflect.

The voters will decide whether or not the emails are relevant; not some flaccid post from Tommy.

if it's the Russians, then the retards are doing it wrong. if they have the smoking gun on Hillary, they should wait until after she's elected, and then drop it.

instant constitutional crisis. the executive branch grinds to a halt (to the extent that it's not already ground to a halt), and we impeach another Clinton -- which would cause legislative paralysis.

don't put it past the clintons to risk the entire nation so they can taste power once again. hell, Billdo just upped the mg on his viagra prescription in preparation for all the interns he's going to get (the wrong) half of a blowjob from.

You know, all this blaming the terrible Russians for stealing our emails, etc. Doesn't this make you think that under Oblunders watch they're doing this? The greatest country in the world is being flummoxed by a country that a few years ago couldn't even feed it's people. How embarrassing.

If we're so great under Oblunder why are we losing? The Dims should be embarrassed instead of being enraged.

I still don't believe it that it's the Russians if it's any consolation to the Dims. It's all DEFLECTION, THEIR ONLY DEFENSE.

the first foreign policy move of the obamites was to pull defensive missile systems out of eastern europe. it was part of the "overcharge" button. we have been their party ******* ever since.

if they're bold enough to steal our email after 7 years of johnny kerry (or his predecessor) putting on his clean panties and jumping in the car every time they call him for booty call at 2am, then, quite frankly, I'm not surprised.