34. Troy
43. Appalachian State
54. Georgia Southern
80. South Alabama
95. Texas State
100. Louisiana
105. Idaho
110. ULM
111. Georgia State
115. New Mexico State
116. Arkansas State

4. Clemson • 6. Houston • 7. Washington • 8. Tennessee • 10. Miami • 11. Wisconsin • 13. Western Michigan • 16. Ole Miss • 17. Boise State • 25. Auburn • 26. Arkansas • 31. Air Force • 36. Georgia Tech • 41. Washington State • 51. San Diego State • 52. Toledo • 56. Southern Miss • 58. Mississippi State • 78. Kentucky • 79. Akron • 81. Tulane • 82. Ohio • 90. Utah State • 93. Old Dominion • 96. Ball State • 106. New Mexico • 108. UNLV • 112. Massachusetts • 126. UTEP

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

(10-02-2016 02:20 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  34. Troy
43. Appalachian State
54. Georgia Southern
80. South Alabama
95. Texas State
100. Louisiana
105. Idaho
110. ULM
111. Georgia State
115. New Mexico State
116. Arkansas State

4. Clemson • 6. Houston • 7. Washington • 8. Tennessee • 10. Miami • 11. Wisconsin • 16. Ole Miss • 17. Boise State • 25. Auburn • 26. Arkansas • 31. Air Force • 36. Georgia Tech • 41. Washington State • 51. San Diego State • 52. Toledo • 56. Southern Miss • 58. Mississippi State • 78. Kentucky • 79. Akron • 81. Tulane • 82. Ohio • 90. Utah State • 93. Old Dominion • 96. Ball State • 106. New Mexico • 108. UNLV • 112. Massachusetts • 126. UTEP

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

Do not forget #13 Western Michigan. Don't want to take anything away from Georgia Southern - they are good team with a lot of talent.

We're still higher than NMSU? Uh...

The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

(10-02-2016 02:20 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  34. Troy
43. Appalachian State
54. Georgia Southern
80. South Alabama
95. Texas State
100. Louisiana
105. Idaho
110. ULM
111. Georgia State
115. New Mexico State
116. Arkansas State

4. Clemson • 6. Houston • 7. Washington • 8. Tennessee • 10. Miami • 11. Wisconsin • 16. Ole Miss • 17. Boise State • 25. Auburn • 26. Arkansas • 31. Air Force • 36. Georgia Tech • 41. Washington State • 51. San Diego State • 52. Toledo • 56. Southern Miss • 58. Mississippi State • 78. Kentucky • 79. Akron • 81. Tulane • 82. Ohio • 90. Utah State • 93. Old Dominion • 96. Ball State • 106. New Mexico • 108. UNLV • 112. Massachusetts • 126. UTEP

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

How are we not last

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Try not to act butt hurt and not being called up to CUSA. Just try...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I think some of what we're seeing is the computer models still using some of last year's data.

Around week 6/7 we should be seeing data from this year only.

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Funny how things work out.

(10-02-2016 02:24 PM)westernwilly Wrote:  Do not forget #13 Western Michigan. Don't want to take anything away from Georgia Southern - they are good team with a lot of talent.

Added to the original post. Thanks.

(10-02-2016 02:57 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:20 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  34. Troy
43. Appalachian State
54. Georgia Southern
80. South Alabama
95. Texas State
100. Louisiana
105. Idaho
110. ULM
111. Georgia State
115. New Mexico State
116. Arkansas State

4. Clemson • 6. Houston • 7. Washington • 8. Tennessee • 10. Miami • 11. Wisconsin • 16. Ole Miss • 17. Boise State • 25. Auburn • 26. Arkansas • 31. Air Force • 36. Georgia Tech • 41. Washington State • 51. San Diego State • 52. Toledo • 56. Southern Miss • 58. Mississippi State • 78. Kentucky • 79. Akron • 81. Tulane • 82. Ohio • 90. Utah State • 93. Old Dominion • 96. Ball State • 106. New Mexico • 108. UNLV • 112. Massachusetts • 126. UTEP

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

How are we not last

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

All your losses, besides Ball State, are to very good teams. I wouldn't get too discouraged yet. Definitely a whole lot better than the the actual bottom teams.

So, for 1-stop shopping to satisfy everyone's CFB rankings needs, dreams and egos.........

The simple rating system (SRS) found at
http://www.footballperspective.com/week-...s-is-back/

The much discussed and overly statistical Sagarin rankings are found at
http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

and as is posted above, Massey's rankings
http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare.htm

Hope this helps.

(10-03-2016 05:17 PM)OldApp79 Wrote:  So, for 1-stop shopping to satisfy everyone's CFB rankings needs, dreams and egos.........

The simple rating system (SRS) found at
http://www.footballperspective.com/week-...s-is-back/

The much discussed and overly statistical Sagarin rankings are found at
http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm

and as is posted above, Massey's rankings
http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare.htm

Hope this helps.

Or you can go here:
http://www.footballstudyhall.com/pages/2...l-profiles

And here:
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/fplus

(10-02-2016 02:58 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Try not to act butt hurt and not being called up to CUSA. Just try...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

you still think CUSA is a move up?

puff puff pass brother.

(10-04-2016 07:11 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:58 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Try not to act butt hurt and not being called up to CUSA. Just try...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

you still think CUSA is a move up?

puff puff pass brother.

Their bottom 7 are behind our bottom team and our top 3 are above their top team. Not sure it can be disputed rationally that we are currently a better conference. Plus, we get more money per team in the bowl season.

(10-04-2016 08:44 AM)APPrising Wrote:  

(10-04-2016 07:11 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:58 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Try not to act butt hurt and not being called up to CUSA. Just try...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

you still think CUSA is a move up?

puff puff pass brother.

Their bottom 7 are behind our bottom team and our top 3 are above their top team. Not sure it can be disputed rationally that we are currently a better conference. Plus, we get more money per team in the bowl season.

More money, higher rankings, relatively equal recruiting from top to bottom, it's hard to argue that the Sun Belt trend of up won't continue while C-USA continues it's death spiral.

They took the teams that contributed to the Belt's perception problem before, thinking that the markets those schools provided would offset their relative lack of success. As of right now, that isn't paying out.

(10-05-2016 11:18 AM)ericsaid Wrote:  

(10-04-2016 08:44 AM)APPrising Wrote:  

(10-04-2016 07:11 AM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:58 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:43 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  The Bottom 7:
FAU
UTSA
FIU
Miami (OH)
UTEP
Rice
Charlotte

Marketz!

Try not to act butt hurt and not being called up to CUSA. Just try...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

you still think CUSA is a move up?

puff puff pass brother.

Their bottom 7 are behind our bottom team and our top 3 are above their top team. Not sure it can be disputed rationally that we are currently a better conference. Plus, we get more money per team in the bowl season.

More money, higher rankings, relatively equal recruiting from top to bottom, it's hard to argue that the Sun Belt trend of up won't continue while C-USA continues it's death spiral.

They took the teams that contributed to the Belt's perception problem before, thinking that the markets those schools provided would offset their relative lack of success. As of right now, that isn't paying out.

Also the misconception that Charlotte has the Charlotte market.