(09-17-2016 04:38 PM)Bogg Wrote: ... but the more I think about it the more I think it's in the best interest of the academies to not unify in one conference. If you're an AD, having the other two academies OOC makes your life that much easier, because it's two fewer OOC games you need to schedule every year and a guaranteed two solid but winnable OOC opponents without any haggling over 2-for-1s or the like.
For the opponents Army wants, it doesn't have to haggle for 2-1's.
One benefit for Army of not being in the American is that the fight versus Navy is down to one game. In the American, playing the Army/Navy game during rivalry week ... if Navy loses to Army but finishes ahead of Army in the conference ladder (as would generally be expected), that waters down the impact of the win.
The other benefit is that it allows the Army / Navy game to be played in the week after CCG's are played, which lets it be a quasi-bowl game as far as viewership goes.
Quote: If anything, I'd expect to see Army go to the MAC or back to (a now much weaker) CUSA.
The MAC is far too compact to give anything like the national schedule that Army would like ... CUSA or AAC are the best for covering parts of the country in-conference so the OOC games can stretch out to the other parts.
And CUSA would definitely offer better prospects of Army going to a bowl game than the AAC would, so between the two, CUSA would be a better choice, if Army thought it needed to join a conference.
At present, Army doesn't need to join a conference. They can get the games they want, and are a good enough "get" for a G5 conference OOC game at the level of school they would like to be playing that they have been able to get some home games in the last half of the year.