He's voting for Shrillary and uses moral values in the same thread. Wowsers.

Where are Hillary's moral values? Let's start with that.

(08-02-2016 07:36 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  He's voting for Shrillary and uses moral values in the same thread. Wowsers.

Where are Hillary's moral values? Let's start with that.

Non Christians love to think they know how we Christians are to live.

Religious appropriation.

So evangelicals should support Hillary instead?

Regardless of whether or not they support Trump, they certainly want someone in that chair from the same party as the 'true' evangelicals they support (however they describe that).

(08-02-2016 06:46 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  There is no limit. He could cheat on his wife with a street walker, film it, then walk her down to the abortion clinic with the press in tow and it wouldn't move the needle for many of his 'evangelical supporters'.

This isn't special to the USA either. Italian right wing Christians stood by Silvio Burlesconi when he committed incredible moral lapses.

Nah, that would make him a liberal.

Trumps a lot of things, I wouldn't say liberal (in this most recent incarnation) is one of them.

(08-02-2016 07:37 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:36 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  He's voting for Shrillary and uses moral values in the same thread. Wowsers.

Where are Hillary's moral values? Let's start with that.

Non Christians love to think they know how we Christians are to live.

Religious appropriation.

You are being presumptuous. Millions of Christians, including myself, will never vote for the egomaniac that is Donald Trump.

P.S. I will never persuade core Trump people to change their minds, nor will strong Hillary supporters be swayed by those who dislike her. It's the undecideds and "soft-leaners" that will decide this election. Just adding my thoughts to make this board more fair and balanced.

(08-02-2016 08:12 PM)Okie Chippewa Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:37 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:36 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  He's voting for Shrillary and uses moral values in the same thread. Wowsers.

Where are Hillary's moral values? Let's start with that.

Non Christians love to think they know how we Christians are to live.

Religious appropriation.

You are being presumptuous. Millions of Christians, including myself, will never vote for the egomaniac that is Donald Trump.

P.S. I will never persuade core Trump people to change their minds, nor will strong Hillary supporters be swayed by those who dislike her. It's the undecideds and "soft-leaners" that will decide this election. Just adding my thoughts to make this board more fair and balanced.

You are Christian? It was hard to tell. But if you are telling the truth, then I apologize to you.

The rest of my point still stands.

(08-02-2016 08:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  [quote='Tom in Lazybrook' pid='13439349' dateline='1470181609']
There is no limit. He could cheat on his wife with a street walker, film it, then walk her down to the abortion clinic with the press in tow and it wouldn't move the needle for many of his 'evangelical supporters'.

Hey, isn't that what killary's husband did?

I'm sure the true evangelicals bailed on Trump a long time ago. They will be watching from home id disgust regardless of who wins.

(08-02-2016 08:12 PM)Okie Chippewa Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:37 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:36 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  He's voting for Shrillary and uses moral values in the same thread. Wowsers.

Where are Hillary's moral values? Let's start with that.

Non Christians love to think they know how we Christians are to live.

Religious appropriation.

You are being presumptuous. Millions of Christians, including myself, will never vote for the egomaniac that is Donald Trump.

P.S. I will never persuade core Trump people to change their minds, nor will strong Hillary supporters be swayed by those who dislike her. It's the undecideds and "soft-leaners" that will decide this election. Just adding my thoughts to make this board more fair and balanced.

That's fine. But you are the reason why Hillary will win.

As long as you know that.

(08-02-2016 06:45 PM)Okie Chippewa Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 04:11 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  So now you and others want the Evangelicals to consider religious beliefs for voting. Before, it was vote on secular guidelines.

No, not religious beliefs. MORAL VALUES. It's now almost a daily routine that Trump utters something that runs counter to the teachings of nearly every religion and most philosophies.

And Hillary *does* something that runs counter to the teachings of nearly every religion and most philosophies.

It's a rock and a hard place election for most people...

The third-party candidate who'd make a major dent in this election would've been an indie run with a sorta Cruz/Huckabee religious flavor ticket, especially if they also went hard against illegal immigration and Mideast refugees, but stopped short of walls and bans. There is no true home amongst any of the 4 parties for the religious right this election - it was Trump's fiery and populist nationalism by default.

Trump would've been doomed.

(08-03-2016 08:18 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The third-party candidate who'd make a major dent in this election would've been an indie run with a sorta Cruz/Huckabee religious flavor ticket, especially if they also went hard against illegal immigration and Mideast refugees, but stopped short of walls and bans. There is no true home amongst any of the 4 parties for the religious right this election - it was Trump's fiery and populist nationalism by default.

Trump would've been doomed.

Agree. All of the 3rd party candidates running are either globalist (Johnson) or have no name recognition.

(08-03-2016 08:18 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The third-party candidate who'd make a major dent in this election would've been an indie run with a sorta Cruz/Huckabee religious flavor ticket, especially if they also went hard against illegal immigration and Mideast refugees, but stopped short of walls and bans. There is no true home amongst any of the 4 parties for the religious right this election - it was Trump's fiery and populist nationalism by default.

Trump would've been doomed.

I'm not sure you understand religious people as well as you think you do.

(08-02-2016 06:56 PM)Okie Chippewa Wrote:  Libtard? That's not very Christian of you. Christ loves everyone.

The image I posted was intended to make people consider its meaning vis a vis the title of the post. I have no clue if it is real or not.

So I'll be more explicit: Look at the logo and THINK about it.

If it isn't real, why?

(08-03-2016 08:53 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-03-2016 08:18 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The third-party candidate who'd make a major dent in this election would've been an indie run with a sorta Cruz/Huckabee religious flavor ticket, especially if they also went hard against illegal immigration and Mideast refugees, but stopped short of walls and bans. There is no true home amongst any of the 4 parties for the religious right this election - it was Trump's fiery and populist nationalism by default.

Trump would've been doomed.

I'm not sure you understand religious people as well as you think you do.

So an independent ticket of never-divorced Republican "names" on a more pro life/religious freedom platform with frequent mentions of their faith would not take a chunk out of Trump's pie?

If so, then you're correct. Maybe I don't fully understand the religious right.

(08-03-2016 09:07 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  

(08-03-2016 08:53 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(08-03-2016 08:18 AM)Motown Bronco Wrote:  The third-party candidate who'd make a major dent in this election would've been an indie run with a sorta Cruz/Huckabee religious flavor ticket, especially if they also went hard against illegal immigration and Mideast refugees, but stopped short of walls and bans. There is no true home amongst any of the 4 parties for the religious right this election - it was Trump's fiery and populist nationalism by default.

Trump would've been doomed.

I'm not sure you understand religious people as well as you think you do.

So an independent ticket of never-divorced Republican "names" on a more pro life/religious freedom platform with frequent mentions of their faith would not take a chunk out of Trump's pie?

Not significantly, no. As someone who is one of the more religious people on the board I can state that we can be rather pragmatic. If "the religious right" was so predictable Trump would not have done so well in the primaries.

The main people opposing trump were not the religious wing of the part it was the establishment wing.

Quote:If so, then you're correct. Maybe I don't fully understand the religious right.

No maybe about it.

(08-02-2016 07:31 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(08-02-2016 07:05 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Nobody knows God like Trump. Believe me!

They've met.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Trump was sent from God. Trust me, I know!