Protecting oneself does not equal fear. However, I don't think anyone would deny that a lot of people seek protection from a sense of fear.
no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:25 PM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Protecting oneself does not equal fear. However, I don't think anyone would deny that a lot of people seek protection from a sense of fear.
no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:25 PM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Protecting oneself does not equal fear. However, I don't think anyone would deny that a lot of people seek protection from a sense of fear.
no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
Yeah leftists are the ones out there only spouting positivity
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:25 PM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:08 PM)Fitbud Wrote: Protecting oneself does not equal fear. However, I don't think anyone would deny that a lot of people seek protection from a sense of fear.
no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:25 PM)EagleX Wrote: no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I'll give you the war on woman argument but that's all you got.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 11:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote: I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I'll give you the war on woman argument but that's all you got.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 11:54 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote: Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I'll give you the war on woman argument but that's all you got.
The Republicans have
War on Christmas
They'll take your guns, your doctors etc. etc.
The terrorists will get us.
The Lesbians will get us.
They trannies will get us.
The blacks will get us.
The thugs will get us.
The Mexicans are gonna get us.
blah blah blah.
Wow a meme? Really?
Shouldn't you be contributing to the discussion with an original thought?
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:54 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote: The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I'll give you the war on woman argument but that's all you got.
The Republicans have
War on Christmas
They'll take your guns, your doctors etc. etc.
The terrorists will get us.
The Lesbians will get us.
They trannies will get us.
The blacks will get us.
The thugs will get us.
The Mexicans are gonna get us.
blah blah blah.
Wow a meme? Really?
Shouldn't you be contributing to the discussion with an original thought?
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote:
(02-22-2016 09:21 PM)NIU007 Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:06 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(02-22-2016 01:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-22-2016 12:25 PM)EagleX Wrote: no, you seek protection out of a sense of fear. that's what the liberals have been selling for 60 years, protection from imaginary terrors.
I seek protection out of a sens of fear? I'm not the one clinging to a gun worried about the "illegals" and the lesbians and the blacks and the browns and the Muslims etc. etc.
Not sure how you link those, but spin away!!!
The right is constantly spouting about things to be afraid of. They've practically patented it.
wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I agree with some of this. Not the bolded part. I was just admiring your use of strong language. Kudos.
Anyhow, the military industrial complex wants us to be afraid of Muslims, extremists, terrorists, Russians, the Chinese and North Korea (that's a short list, anyway).
The libertarians say we need to be afraid of government.
The righties say we need to be afraid of liberals who take from the makers and give to the takers.
The lefties say we need to be afraid of those who buy government and bend it to their ends.
The race baiters (of all races) say we need to fear those of other races.
There's more, I'm sure. But I suspect all sides resort to fear mongering at one time or another.
RE: Muslim man files lawsuit against Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service
(02-23-2016 11:59 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:58 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:54 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:
(02-23-2016 11:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:
(02-23-2016 10:27 AM)EagleX Wrote: wait. stop. I ignore a lot of the bull**** in this forum, but that one is just delusional. citing just one example that you socialist bastards have been riding hard and putting up wet in every election cycle for 20 years, what would you call "the war on women", if not terror mongering? "vote for us, or the republicans will rip your uterus out!". or what about the commercial where paul ryan throws granny off a cliff?
the flat fact of the matter is that the liberals have to convince enough of the electorate that there is some sinister "they" out there that is out to get "you", and that's when they need "us" to, in the typical parlance, "fight for working families". who is that mysterious, constantly cited, yet never defined "1%" that is out to get everyone?
no. you're not merely wrong, you're irretrievably deceived. the terror mongers are the liberals. if there is no one to be afraid of, then there is no reason for them to even exist.
I'll give you the war on woman argument but that's all you got.
The Republicans have
War on Christmas
They'll take your guns, your doctors etc. etc.
The terrorists will get us.
The Lesbians will get us.
They trannies will get us.
The blacks will get us.
The thugs will get us.
The Mexicans are gonna get us.
blah blah blah.
Wow a meme? Really?
Shouldn't you be contributing to the discussion with an original thought?