Some more information on his trip to the ranch.

Scalia's Hunting Trip Was a Gift From a "Friend" Who Had Business Before the Supreme Court Last Year

Pretty nitpicky...but interesting nonetheless.

(02-13-2016 08:07 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  well...RIP...I guess.



Jan 20th 2017 is a LONG way away...good look bluffing for that long GOP

38 days to go... Interesting to see what happens!

(02-17-2016 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:35 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry, not true at all. 5. From the time of nomination, only 5 in history have taken 100 days or more for either a reject, withdrawal or an approval. 5 out of around 148. It's in the link I posted.

Sure, fine. Look, I read the link - it's why I posted. And if you're going to hang your hat on 25 days, you're relying on the nomination process for Washington, Lincoln, and Taft to still be relevant today. I don't think it is. If you get to what's important about Fit's point (regardless of the source of his number), it's that for the last several presidencies, the average time for the entire process, from first nomination, through rejections and withdrawals, to appointment, is probably in the ballpark of 100 days.

OK, this made me do the ******* math. Back of the envelope calc looks like 80+ days per if I go back to LBJ.

Sorry, I'm an accountant by trade.

Anyone know why Red left the board? Maybe he saw the future coming.

Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Yep.

(12-12-2016 09:58 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Yep.

What did he do?

(12-12-2016 09:58 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:58 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Yep.

What did he do?

Where should one start? Arrogant prick? Insulting Ahole? Gutter Snipe? Purveyor of Animal Porn?

You may narrow it down, but there's a start.

(12-12-2016 10:03 PM)wahoowa Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:58 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:58 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Yep.

What did he do?

Where should one start? Arrogant prick? Insulting Ahole? Gutter Snipe? Purveyor of Animal Porn?

You may narrow it down, but there's a start.

Ha. Yeah, I get that he was difficult to deal with and loved sending people down trolling rabbit hole type arguments, but I was what finally put it over the edge.

Did y'all make fun of his job again or his decor in his apartment?

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Seems that way.

I hope wherever he is that he has a chronic case of diarrhea combined with an uncontrollable case of spasmodic coughing fits. That was one miserable subhuman being.

(12-12-2016 10:20 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Seems that way.

I hope wherever he is that he has a chronic case of diarrhea combined with an uncontrollable case of spasmodic coughing fits. That was one miserable subhuman being.

Word is, he's shacked up with stinky. I'll bet they make a hell of a couple.

(12-12-2016 10:30 PM)wahoowa Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 10:20 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:57 PM)ArmyBlazer Wrote:  Whatever happened to UofMemphis? Did he get banned or something?

Seems that way.

I hope wherever he is that he has a chronic case of diarrhea combined with an uncontrollable case of spasmodic coughing fits. That was one miserable subhuman being.

Word is, he's shacked up with stinky. I'll bet they make a hell of a couple.

I doubt that. Stink might not have much morals but I'd bet the farm he'd draw the line at that POS.

(12-12-2016 09:52 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:35 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry, not true at all. 5. From the time of nomination, only 5 in history have taken 100 days or more for either a reject, withdrawal or an approval. 5 out of around 148. It's in the link I posted.

Sure, fine. Look, I read the link - it's why I posted. And if you're going to hang your hat on 25 days, you're relying on the nomination process for Washington, Lincoln, and Taft to still be relevant today. I don't think it is. If you get to what's important about Fit's point (regardless of the source of his number), it's that for the last several presidencies, the average time for the entire process, from first nomination, through rejections and withdrawals, to appointment, is probably in the ballpark of 100 days.

OK, this made me do the ******* math. Back of the envelope calc looks like 80+ days per if I go back to LBJ.

Sorry, I'm an accountant by trade.

Anyone know why Red left the board? Maybe he saw the future coming.

the future of you being the most insufferable a$$hole possible?

seriously the mods with their ridiculous one-sided policies that are devoid of logic will say my one simple act of calling you an ******* for your 20 thread tirade which is legitimately an a$$hole thing to do is more of an issue than your tirade itself.

so what? the libs are at fault because they choose to not stay at a place where pricks like yourself have no intention of being civil? you are literally b*tching about a lib choosing not to come around when you have demonstrated your intention to be nothing but an a$$hole. I make one comment about the F-35 and you respond by bumping a half dozen of my threads.

it is the most retarded line of thinking ever to see the cons saying that libs are somehow obligated to put up with the lib bashing.

(12-12-2016 10:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:52 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:35 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Sorry, not true at all. 5. From the time of nomination, only 5 in history have taken 100 days or more for either a reject, withdrawal or an approval. 5 out of around 148. It's in the link I posted.

Sure, fine. Look, I read the link - it's why I posted. And if you're going to hang your hat on 25 days, you're relying on the nomination process for Washington, Lincoln, and Taft to still be relevant today. I don't think it is. If you get to what's important about Fit's point (regardless of the source of his number), it's that for the last several presidencies, the average time for the entire process, from first nomination, through rejections and withdrawals, to appointment, is probably in the ballpark of 100 days.

OK, this made me do the ******* math. Back of the envelope calc looks like 80+ days per if I go back to LBJ.

Sorry, I'm an accountant by trade.

Anyone know why Red left the board? Maybe he saw the future coming.

the future of you being the most insufferable a$$hole possible?

seriously the mods with their ridiculous one-sided policies that are devoid of logic will say my one simple act of calling you an ******* for your 20 thread tirade which is legitimately an a$$hole thing to do is more of an issue than your tirade itself.

so what? the libs are at fault because they choose to not stay at a place where pricks like yourself have no intention of being civil? you are literally b*tching about a lib choosing not to come around when you have demonstrated your intention to be nothing but an a$$hole. I make one comment about the F-35 and you respond by bumping a half dozen of my threads.

it is the most retarded line of thinking ever to see the cons saying that libs are somehow obligated to put up with the lib bashing.

Oh my, I do believe someone is triggered....

(12-12-2016 10:42 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 10:40 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 09:52 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-17-2016 12:35 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  Sure, fine. Look, I read the link - it's why I posted. And if you're going to hang your hat on 25 days, you're relying on the nomination process for Washington, Lincoln, and Taft to still be relevant today. I don't think it is. If you get to what's important about Fit's point (regardless of the source of his number), it's that for the last several presidencies, the average time for the entire process, from first nomination, through rejections and withdrawals, to appointment, is probably in the ballpark of 100 days.

OK, this made me do the ******* math. Back of the envelope calc looks like 80+ days per if I go back to LBJ.

Sorry, I'm an accountant by trade.

Anyone know why Red left the board? Maybe he saw the future coming.

the future of you being the most insufferable a$$hole possible?

seriously the mods with their ridiculous one-sided policies that are devoid of logic will say my one simple act of calling you an ******* for your 20 thread tirade which is legitimately an a$$hole thing to do is more of an issue than your tirade itself.

so what? the libs are at fault because they choose to not stay at a place where pricks like yourself have no intention of being civil? you are literally b*tching about a lib choosing not to come around when you have demonstrated your intention to be nothing but an a$$hole. I make one comment about the F-35 and you respond by bumping a half dozen of my threads.

it is the most retarded line of thinking ever to see the cons saying that libs are somehow obligated to put up with the lib bashing.

Oh my, I do believe someone is triggered....

which was obviously your plan and why I find your actions ridiculously pathetic.

looks like that finally shut him up.

(12-12-2016 10:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  looks like that finally shut him up.

Do what? You think too much of yourself.

(12-12-2016 10:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  looks like that finally shut him up.

what? the fact that you admitted you were triggered?

(12-12-2016 11:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(12-12-2016 10:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  looks like that finally shut him up.

Do what? You think too much of yourself.

Which is peculiar considering he isn't worth much.