Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Mountain West TV Future
Author Message
1IvyDog Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 132
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 3
I Root For: Fresno State
Location: New York, NY
Post: #21
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-22-2016 05:55 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:31 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:39 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:35 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  Every team gets $1.1 million in TV revenue minimum. What they get in bonus $$ is added to the 1.1 million. Hawaii has its own deal that is not part of the MW and get $2.3 million from their Oceanic TV contract.

You might want to bookmark your comment so you can point it out again later, because no matter how many times it's pointed out to folks, there will still be people posting here who claim that most MWC members get no TV money at all. 07-coffee3

Exactly. I remember reading on here that teams like UNLV received no tv money at all and Boise was getting it all...Why would any MWC schools that were being pursued by the AAC stay in the MWC if they were making 0 in tv dollars? They wouldn't.

I think message board fans vastly overestimate how hard Aresco & Co were trying to recruit MWC teams in 2012. The focus was on BYU, then there was a stab at Fresno State and UNLV, before Boise pulled the plug.

You are correct. This is where Aresco failed. UNLV and Fresno would have jumped over to the AAC only if they made a true western division of Houston, SMU, Boise, SDSU, UNLV and Fresno for all sports but several eastern schools balked.
01-22-2016 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CougarRed Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,450
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-22-2016 08:25 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  BYU, Boise, San Diego St, Air Force, UNLV and Fresno St were all offered AAC invites. In that order. I followed this intently from 2011 and 2013. It's all we posted about all day everyday for two years.

SDSU and Boise accepted, then backed out when they failed to take a few more MWC schools with them to form a true "western division".

I followed it too. Boise and SDSU got football only invites to join the Big East. And clearly AF and BYU had similar invites. It was unclear to me whether UNLV or Fresno were ever invited for football only. They were NEVER invited for all sports. Neither were SDSU and Boise.

Oh - and Boise backed out after the TV deal came back at $2M instead of the projected $6M for football only. The $6M projection was made when Boise joined the Big East before the basketball schools left.

So Boise used its leverage to get a sweetheart TV deal from the MWC.

Boise backing out had little to do with the failure to create a Western all sports divisison. SDSU was forced to back out after Boise made its move.
01-22-2016 10:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #23
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-22-2016 10:35 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 08:25 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  BYU, Boise, San Diego St, Air Force, UNLV and Fresno St were all offered AAC invites. In that order. I followed this intently from 2011 and 2013. It's all we posted about all day everyday for two years.

SDSU and Boise accepted, then backed out when they failed to take a few more MWC schools with them to form a true "western division".

I followed it too. Boise and SDSU got football only invites to join the Big East. And clearly AF and BYU had similar invites. It was unclear to me whether UNLV or Fresno were ever invited for football only. They were NEVER invited for all sports. Neither were SDSU and Boise.

Oh - and Boise backed out after the TV deal came back at $2M instead of the projected $6M for football only. The $6M projection was made when Boise joined the Big East before the basketball schools left.

So Boise used its leverage to get a sweetheart TV deal from the MWC.

Boise backing out had little to do with the failure to create a Western all sports divisison. SDSU was forced to back out after Boise made its move.
OK, It's fair to say that Boise backed out because of the tv $ not being there for the Big East initially expected, but before they backed out officially around Cheistmas/New Years of that year, there was a mad rush for more western schools. First Aresco publicly said BYU, they refused. Then Air Force, they refused. Then at the last second ESPN or CBS reported that the AAC was talking to UNLV and Fresno St. They didn't budge. Boise announced they were staying in MWC after all. A few weeks later SDSU announced they too weren't coming over here to the AAC. SDSU fans really wanted to come here too. Or at least the many who were posting over here on this board at the time. Cheers!
01-23-2016 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
johnbragg Offline
Five Minute Google Expert
*

Posts: 16,451
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 1014
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-22-2016 09:25 PM)1IvyDog Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:55 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:31 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:39 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:35 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  Every team gets $1.1 million in TV revenue minimum. What they get in bonus $$ is added to the 1.1 million. Hawaii has its own deal that is not part of the MW and get $2.3 million from their Oceanic TV contract.

You might want to bookmark your comment so you can point it out again later, because no matter how many times it's pointed out to folks, there will still be people posting here who claim that most MWC members get no TV money at all. 07-coffee3

Exactly. I remember reading on here that teams like UNLV received no tv money at all and Boise was getting it all...Why would any MWC schools that were being pursued by the AAC stay in the MWC if they were making 0 in tv dollars? They wouldn't.

I think message board fans vastly overestimate how hard Aresco & Co were trying to recruit MWC teams in 2012. The focus was on BYU, then there was a stab at Fresno State and UNLV, before Boise pulled the plug.

You are correct. This is where Aresco failed. UNLV and Fresno would have jumped over to the AAC only if they made a true western division of Houston, SMU, Boise, SDSU, UNLV and Fresno for all sports but several eastern schools balked.

The "all-sports western division" was always pretty much a message board fantasy. The Big East, including the basketball schools, would have swallowed Boise STate as a full member if we had to, but we didn't. Nobody "balked"--nobody with any clout was talking about all-sports schools west of I-35.

The invites to Boise STate, Air Force, BYU, SDSU and finally UNLV and Fresno were always about football-only memberships. Everything coming out of Houston and SMU indicated that they wanted Eastern Time Zone exposure over Mountain and PAcific.

Thinking about numbers for a second, the "all-sports western division" would have Boise STate, SDSU, UNLV, SMU, Houston, maybe Fresno for 6. That leaves the east with Memphis, Rutgers/Tulane, Louisville/ECU, Cincinnati, USF, UCF, TEmple, UConn and NAvy football. That's 9 for football, 8 if you send NAvy west.

So was Memphis also supposed to be in the West? Did anyone ask Memphis about that?
01-23-2016 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,850
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 179
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #25
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-22-2016 09:25 PM)1IvyDog Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:55 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:31 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:39 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:35 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  Every team gets $1.1 million in TV revenue minimum. What they get in bonus $$ is added to the 1.1 million. Hawaii has its own deal that is not part of the MW and get $2.3 million from their Oceanic TV contract.

You might want to bookmark your comment so you can point it out again later, because no matter how many times it's pointed out to folks, there will still be people posting here who claim that most MWC members get no TV money at all. 07-coffee3

Exactly. I remember reading on here that teams like UNLV received no tv money at all and Boise was getting it all...Why would any MWC schools that were being pursued by the AAC stay in the MWC if they were making 0 in tv dollars? They wouldn't.

I think message board fans vastly overestimate how hard Aresco & Co were trying to recruit MWC teams in 2012. The focus was on BYU, then there was a stab at Fresno State and UNLV, before Boise pulled the plug.

You are correct. This is where Aresco failed. UNLV and Fresno would have jumped over to the AAC only if they made a true western division of Houston, SMU, Boise, SDSU, UNLV and Fresno for all sports but several eastern schools balked.

The western division was never going to happen. Not with the C7 schools involved. Also, even though SDSU has no problems to downgrade their basketball in the Big West, I really doubt Fresno and UNLV wanted to be part of the Big West again.
01-23-2016 12:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,884
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 10:35 PM)CougarRed Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 08:25 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  BYU, Boise, San Diego St, Air Force, UNLV and Fresno St were all offered AAC invites. In that order. I followed this intently from 2011 and 2013. It's all we posted about all day everyday for two years.

SDSU and Boise accepted, then backed out when they failed to take a few more MWC schools with them to form a true "western division".

I followed it too. Boise and SDSU got football only invites to join the Big East. And clearly AF and BYU had similar invites. It was unclear to me whether UNLV or Fresno were ever invited for football only. They were NEVER invited for all sports. Neither were SDSU and Boise.

Oh - and Boise backed out after the TV deal came back at $2M instead of the projected $6M for football only. The $6M projection was made when Boise joined the Big East before the basketball schools left.

So Boise used its leverage to get a sweetheart TV deal from the MWC.

Boise backing out had little to do with the failure to create a Western all sports divisison. SDSU was forced to back out after Boise made its move.
OK, It's fair to say that Boise backed out because of the tv $ not being there for the Big East initially expected, but before they backed out officially around Cheistmas/New Years of that year, there was a mad rush for more western schools. First Aresco publicly said BYU, they refused. Then Air Force, they refused. Then at the last second ESPN or CBS reported that the AAC was talking to UNLV and Fresno St. They didn't budge. Boise announced they were staying in MWC after all. A few weeks later SDSU announced they too weren't coming over here to the AAC. SDSU fans really wanted to come here too. Or at least the many who were posting over here on this board at the time. Cheers!

I think the likely money projections were not looking good in early 2013, but at the actual time Boise left, Kustra was quoted as saying that the Big East (AAC) ddnt have ANY offer on the table. That would indicate nobody knew what the final number would be at that point. I think its fair to say a AAC package with SDSU and Boise was likely to be worth more than the 2 million we got without them. That said, they probably had at least an inkling that it wouldn't be 6 million a team.

While money was certainly a component, the biggest issue was the total package was just a bad deal for Boise. First, it was a football only package. That means that even if the AAC was getting 5 million per all-sports team, Boise would get just 70% of that (3.5 million). Then layer on to that poor 70% football-only deal, the idea that Boise would have to move all its Olympic sports to the Big West, a definite step down from the MW. Worse yet, Boise was going to have to pay a separate million dollar entry fee to the Big West and $900K in annual travel subsidies just to be a part of a lesser Olympic conference. The travel subsidies were the worst part of the deal. Every year, those $900K in Big West travel subsidies would effectively reduce Boise's net revenue from the AAC by almost a million dollars.

So, again, assuming the AAC got 5 million an all-sports team, Boise would get just 70% of that (3.5 million) minus the travel subsidies ($900K) for a total of 2.6 million. That's not great. Worse yet, it doesn't even begin to consider increased travel costs of the AAC. Still, it was more than the 1 million per team the MW was making before.

Then in late December 2012, the MW was finally able to renegotiate their deal (because the shut down of the "Mountain" network was a breach of the contract terms and allowed the conference to reopen the deal). That allowed the MW to increase their payout to nearly 2 million a team. That made th MW and the AAC almost a wash (and that was assuming the AAC was getting 5 million per all-sports team---which was not a given). When the MW came to the table with the sweetheart "bonus" deal for nationally televised games and gave Boise a contract set up that guaranteed that most all their games would be nationally televised, Boise basically was guaranteed at least 3 million earnings without relegating their Olympic sports to the Big West. Well, that was pretty much game over for the western expansion. Boise came back and requested a similar deal from the AAC and was rejected. The western expansion was finished.

Bottom line, it was a bad deal monetarily and it was a bad deal athletically for Boise's Olympic sports.

The keys to a viable AAC western expansion were (and still are)

1) all sports

2) enough western teams to form a reasonable western division

3) effective use of divisions in basketball and non-revenue sports to control travel costs.

4) Better money. That said, the money doesn't have to be massive better as long as 1-3 above are properly handled. In the BE/AAC western expansion, none of the 3 points were handled---which is why is collapsed when there wasn't a huge pay day. Had 1-3 been handled, it could have been successful with just a small initial pay increase and built toward a major payday as a dominant G5 conference (basically about as close to a best of the rest league as there could be) in future contracts.
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 01:19 PM by Attackcoog.)
01-23-2016 01:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MJG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,278
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
Post: #27
RE: Mountain West TV Future
How does the 1.1 million base payment compare to other G5 conferences?

CSU and Air Force received no bonus money the first year and played in the championship game.

I don't see Boise falling apart but if they win one or two of the next five conference championships they lose their advantage.
They have won one of the first three of this deal so far.
01-23-2016 02:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CougarRed Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,450
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 429
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Mountain West TV Future
Amercian schools get about $2M per year per school in TV money, perhaps a smidge more.

The new CUSA TV deal apparently is worth no more than $700K per year per school.
01-23-2016 03:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #29
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 02:27 PM)MJG Wrote:  How does the 1.1 million base payment compare to other G5 conferences?

CSU and Air Force received no bonus money the first year and played in the championship game.

I don't see Boise falling apart but if they win one or two of the next five conference championships they lose their advantage.
They have won one of the first three of this deal so far.

The MWC total dollars are the same as the AAC's correct? Question 2: Is Hawaii counted as part of that? If so, if you divided the MWC TV money equally 12 ways it comes out to 2.2 million a year (not counting this digital package others are talking about which is probably very small at this point) So if there are MWC schools only making 1.1 a year, than who besides Boise in the MWC is making 3 million plus? Where's the extra money going if there's multiple MWC schools only making 1.1 million? Cheers!
01-23-2016 03:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MinerInWisconsin Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,699
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 504
I Root For: UTEP, of course
Location: The Frozen Tundra
Post: #30
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 03:48 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-23-2016 02:27 PM)MJG Wrote:  How does the 1.1 million base payment compare to other G5 conferences?

CSU and Air Force received no bonus money the first year and played in the championship game.

I don't see Boise falling apart but if they win one or two of the next five conference championships they lose their advantage.
They have won one of the first three of this deal so far.

The MWC total dollars are the same as the AAC's correct? Question 2: Is Hawaii counted as part of that? If so, if you divided the MWC TV money equally 12 ways it comes out to 2.2 million a year (not counting this digital package others are talking about which is probably very small at this point) So if there are MWC schools only making 1.1 a year, than who besides Boise in the MWC is making 3 million plus? Where's the extra money going if there's multiple MWC schools only making 1.1 million? Cheers!

If the MWC contracts are worth a total of $18 million then each school would get $1.5 million if the money was divided equally. Since the MWC fan says that each school is getting $1.1 million as a base, that leaves 400k x 12 (or $4.8 million) to put into the bonus pool. So each school was willing to gamble that they might give up 400k in order to keep BSU in the conference. May be worth it.
01-23-2016 05:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MJG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,278
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
Post: #31
RE: Mountain West TV Future
Isn't Boise guaranteed half the bonus money.
Something like eight games are available for 300k bonus.
Boise could even take some of these games.

Does anyone have the breakdown of how much each school has earned above the 1.1 million so far ?
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 06:08 PM by MJG.)
01-23-2016 06:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billings Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,340
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Wyo / Mont St.
Location: Billings, Montana
Post: #32
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 05:48 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  If the MWC contracts are worth a total of $18 million then each school would get $1.5 million if the money was divided equally. Since the MWC fan says that each school is getting $1.1 million as a base, that leaves 400k x 12 (or $4.8 million) to put into the bonus pool. So each school was willing to gamble that they might give up 400k in order to keep BSU in the conference. May be worth it.

Here ya go. BTW with Hawaii not sharing in the TV money your numbers are a bit off as you divide by 11 not 12 teams sharing in TV revenue

2015 MW Football TV Bonus Payouts:

Boise State: $1.6 million
Nevada: $880,000
San Diego State: $880,000
Wyoming: $880,000
Fresno State: $680,000
Utah State: $680,000
Air Force: $580,000
UNLV: $380,000
CSU: $80,000
New Mexico: $80,000
San Jose State: $80,000

So basically all but four MWC schools are ahead of where they would be had the money been evenly distributed.

http://www.obnug.com/2015/12/11/9890690/...-tv-payout
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 06:18 PM by billings.)
01-23-2016 06:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billings Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,340
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Wyo / Mont St.
Location: Billings, Montana
Post: #33
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 06:08 PM)MJG Wrote:  Isn't Boise guaranteed half the bonus money.
Something like eight games are available for 300k bonus.
Boise could even take some of these games.

Does anyone have the breakdown of how much each school has earned above the 1.1 million so far ?

No Boise is not guaranteed half of the bonus money

See post above
01-23-2016 06:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,884
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 06:17 PM)billings Wrote:  
(01-23-2016 06:08 PM)MJG Wrote:  Isn't Boise guaranteed half the bonus money.
Something like eight games are available for 300k bonus.
Boise could even take some of these games.

Does anyone have the breakdown of how much each school has earned above the 1.1 million so far ?

No Boise is not guaranteed half of the bonus money

See post above

Correct. Now I do believe they are guaranteed 3 or 4 games each year that would qualify for the bonus in thier ESPN contract. The real advantage Boise has is thier contract is not with CBS-Sports but is with ESPN. CBS-Sports has first tier rights to the rest of the league and gets to make 20 selections before ESPN starts to pick games. CBS-Sports games do not qualify for the bonus. So, the other most desirsble games get taken by CBS-Sports. Boise home games being off limits to the CBS is a nice advantage when it comes to racking up bonus payments.
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 07:55 PM by Attackcoog.)
01-23-2016 07:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billings Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,340
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Wyo / Mont St.
Location: Billings, Montana
Post: #35
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 07:50 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(01-23-2016 06:17 PM)billings Wrote:  
(01-23-2016 06:08 PM)MJG Wrote:  Isn't Boise guaranteed half the bonus money.
Something like eight games are available for 300k bonus.
Boise could even take some of these games.

Does anyone have the breakdown of how much each school has earned above the 1.1 million so far ?

No Boise is not guaranteed half of the bonus money

See post above

Correct. Now I do believe they are guaranteed 3 or 4 games each year that would qualify for the bonus in thier ESPN contract. The real advantage Boise has is thier contract is not with CBS-Sports but is with ESPN. CBS-Sports has first tier rights to the rest of the league and gets to make 20 selections before ESPN starts to pick games. CBS-Sports games do not qualify for the bonus. So, the other most desirsble games get taken by CBS-Sports. Boise home games being off limits to the CBS is a nice advantage when it comes to racking up bonus payments.

Not sure the 20 CBS selections is correct though. I have not heard the actual number published but I know they alternate picks between ESPN and CBS after CBS takes some off the top. I don't think CBS gets the first 20 though. A lot of Boise fans are complaining about ESPN and late night start times. There are things they don't like about this contract as well
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 09:27 PM by billings.)
01-23-2016 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MJG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,278
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
Post: #36
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 06:16 PM)billings Wrote:  
(01-23-2016 05:48 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  If the MWC contracts are worth a total of $18 million then each school would get $1.5 million if the money was divided equally. Since the MWC fan says that each school is getting $1.1 million as a base, that leaves 400k x 12 (or $4.8 million) to put into the bonus pool. So each school was willing to gamble that they might give up 400k in order to keep BSU in the conference. May be worth it.

Here ya go. BTW with Hawaii not sharing in the TV money your numbers are a bit off as you divide by 11 not 12 teams sharing in TV revenue

2015 MW Football TV Bonus Payouts:

Boise State: $1.6 million
Nevada: $880,000
San Diego State: $880,000
Wyoming: $880,000
Fresno State: $680,000
Utah State: $680,000
Air Force: $580,000
UNLV: $380,000
CSU: $80,000
New Mexico: $80,000
San Jose State: $80,000

So basically all but four MWC schools are ahead of where they would be had the money been evenly distributed.

http://www.obnug.com/2015/12/11/9890690/...-tv-payout

Looks like New Mexico and CSU are flight risks.
They are good basketball schools and strong academic institutions. The AAC could add them they make sense in a Western division of the AAC.

Both seem to be on the rise especially with CSU getting a new stadium.
01-23-2016 09:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jdgaucho Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,291
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 115
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #37
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 12:24 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 09:25 PM)1IvyDog Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:55 PM)johnbragg Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 05:31 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(01-22-2016 04:39 PM)Wedge Wrote:  You might want to bookmark your comment so you can point it out again later, because no matter how many times it's pointed out to folks, there will still be people posting here who claim that most MWC members get no TV money at all. 07-coffee3

Exactly. I remember reading on here that teams like UNLV received no tv money at all and Boise was getting it all...Why would any MWC schools that were being pursued by the AAC stay in the MWC if they were making 0 in tv dollars? They wouldn't.

I think message board fans vastly overestimate how hard Aresco & Co were trying to recruit MWC teams in 2012. The focus was on BYU, then there was a stab at Fresno State and UNLV, before Boise pulled the plug.

You are correct. This is where Aresco failed. UNLV and Fresno would have jumped over to the AAC only if they made a true western division of Houston, SMU, Boise, SDSU, UNLV and Fresno for all sports but several eastern schools balked.

The western division was never going to happen. Not with the C7 schools involved. Also, even though SDSU has no problems to downgrade their basketball in the Big West, I really doubt Fresno and UNLV wanted to be part of the Big West again.

Many SDSU fans were screaming bloody murder about allegedly throwing basketball under the bus. Their cries have turned out to be overblown, mistaken fears. But they'll never say that because doing so would be admitting the BW is stronger than they expected.

The irony is that the strong OOC schedule they said they would need to offset the poor Big West opponents, is no different than what they are doing now to offset the Mountain West schedule. This year the Big West and Mountain West spent much of the season right next to each other in conference RPI. And last year the two conferences were in the same neighborhood as well. Oops.

By the way, Cal State Fullerton was 1-15 last year in the Big West. And 2-1 vs the Mountain West. Granted the MW wins were over the bottom teams, San Jose State and Nevada. But as far as the RPI and SOS goes for San Diego State, playing Nevada, SJSU and Air Force essentially meant the same as playing Cal State Northridge, UC Riverside and Fullerton. That should never happen. But it did and might very well continue going forward.
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016 11:51 PM by jdgaucho.)
01-23-2016 11:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
1IvyDog Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 132
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 3
I Root For: Fresno State
Location: New York, NY
Post: #38
RE: Mountain West TV Future
(01-23-2016 02:27 PM)MJG Wrote:  How does the 1.1 million base payment compare to other G5 conferences?

CSU and Air Force received no bonus money the first year and played in the championship game.

I don't see Boise falling apart but if they win one or two of the next five conference championships they lose their advantage.
They have won one of the first three of this deal so far.

Fresno played USU in the first championship game.
(This post was last modified: 01-24-2016 11:22 AM by 1IvyDog.)
01-24-2016 01:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.