(01-19-2016 12:59 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(01-19-2016 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, the commentary does not mention Mary or Christ! If it were that simple, don't you think it'd say that?!?

So that means that you agree with the commentary, right?

You AGREE that a VIRGIN having a CHILD who is meant to RULE ALL NATIONS with a ROD OF IRON and is the called up to HEAVEN in NO WAY symbolized Mary or Jesus, ON ANY LEVEL.

Does that about cover it?

Ummmm, Revelation 12 makes no mention of the woman being a virgin. It does not it any way imply it either.

(01-19-2016 12:59 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(01-19-2016 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, the commentary does not mention Mary or Christ! If it were that simple, don't you think it'd say that?!?

So that means that you agree with the commentary, right?

You AGREE that a VIRGIN having a CHILD who is meant to RULE ALL NATIONS with a ROD OF IRON and is the called up to HEAVEN in NO WAY symbolized Mary or Jesus, ON ANY LEVEL.

Does that about cover it?

EVERY OPINION IS VALID IF YOU YELL LOUD ENOUGH

(01-19-2016 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ummmm, Revelation 12 makes no mention of the woman being a virgin. It does not it any way imply it either.

Oh boy......

The Church does not "rule all nations" with a "ROD OF IRON", JESUS CHRIST DOES. And the church is not "called up into heaven" at this point, because the dragon goes out to "make war with her offspring who keep the commandments and testimony of Jesus Christ." THAT IS THE CHURCH

Even a 5 year old can see this is Jesus, and the woman is Mary.

But the verse has more that one meaning and application.

Red, that is what happens when you are too busy googling other peoples commentaries instead of just reading the chapter for yourself and understanding it for yourself.

This is ridiculous

This whole thread is LOLs