Total Offense

#6 ranked

3901 yards

42 TD

557 YPG

Scoring Offense

#3 ranked

44 TD

11 FG

48.9 PPG

Passing Offense:

#7 ranked

2506 yards

19 TD

358 YPG

Rushing Offense:

#35 ranked

1395 yards

23 TD

199 YPG

Completion %

#1 ranked

.724%

First Downs

#8

197 first downs

Third Down %

#7

.500%

Red Zone Offense:

#1

40/41

.976%

------------------------------------------

Total Defense

#107 ranked

Passing Yards allowed

#127 ranked

Rushing Yards allowed

#20 ranked

115 YPG

Red Zone Defense

#51

.818%

Third Down Conversion Pct Defense

#28 ranked

.327%

Our red zone offense is the best I have ever seen

When you have a kicker that ain't gonna miss, the red zone scoring is automatic.

If you notice on defense, the red zone defense is respectable and the 3rd down defense is very respectable where the opposing offense typically is in short to intermediate yards to go. Add this to our exceptional run stop defense and what is happening is that the tigers secondary is letting up on the big 20+ pass plays (the bombs) but is holding ground on short to intermediate plays. Got to clean that up somehow

(10-25-2015 07:11 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  If you notice on defense, the red zone defense is respectable and the 3rd down defense is very respectable where the opposing offense typically is in short to intermediate yards to go. Add this to our exceptional run stop defense and what is happening is that the tigers secondary is letting up on the big 20+ pass plays (the bombs) but is holding ground on short to intermediate plays. Got to clean that up somehow

The short field is better for our secondary. Our Achilles heel this year is the deep ball.

(10-25-2015 05:06 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  do you realize... if not for taking a knee in Victory formation to run out the clock one time, we could be perfect in the red zone?

That was last year.

This year it was unfortunately a missed FG :(.

4th and 4 at USF 19
(4:15 - 1st) Jake Elliott 36 yd FG MISSED

Solo Tackles Made #11
Punting Average #23 44.5 yards per punt
Field Goal Percent #5 91.7%
Extra Point Attemps #6 43 for 43
Extra Point Percent #1 100%
Longest Field Goal #11 52 yards
Rushing TDs #10 23 TDs
Passing TDs #12 19 TDs

(10-25-2015 07:51 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 05:06 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  do you realize... if not for taking a knee in Victory formation to run out the clock one time, we could be perfect in the red zone?

That was last year.

This year it was unfortunately a missed FG :(.

4th and 4 at USF 19
(4:15 - 1st) Jake Elliott 36 yd FG MISSED

That does not count The Red Zone is inside the 20. So a field goal from the 36 is not a Red Zone play.

(10-25-2015 07:39 PM)Halfcourt Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 07:11 PM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  If you notice on defense, the red zone defense is respectable and the 3rd down defense is very respectable where the opposing offense typically is in short to intermediate yards to go. Add this to our exceptional run stop defense and what is happening is that the tigers secondary is letting up on the big 20+ pass plays (the bombs) but is holding ground on short to intermediate plays. Got to clean that up somehow

The short field is better for our secondary. Our Achilles heel this year is the deep ball.

So, one way to look at it is......if our secondary has a long pass completion to deal with....just tackle the receiver and do it inside the 20 and there is a good chance we can hold them. Maybe we should also interfere on all those long passes and hope the penalty takes the opposing team within the 20 or into a short yardage situation so we can hold them. The odds against them scoring would be more in our favor if defensive backs interfered with the receiver on long passes, especially if they have a bad field goal kicker. I guess that would require some calculations to see if it made sense.

(10-25-2015 09:26 PM)DallasTiger Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 07:51 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 05:06 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  do you realize... if not for taking a knee in Victory formation to run out the clock one time, we could be perfect in the red zone?

That was last year.

This year it was unfortunately a missed FG :(.

4th and 4 at USF 19
(4:15 - 1st) Jake Elliott 36 yd FG MISSED

That does not count The Red Zone is inside the 20. So a field goal from the 36 is not a Red Zone play.

LOS was the 19 so yes it was in the red zone. If your post was sarcastic my bad.

(10-25-2015 09:26 PM)DallasTiger Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 07:51 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 05:06 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  do you realize... if not for taking a knee in Victory formation to run out the clock one time, we could be perfect in the red zone?

That was last year.

This year it was unfortunately a missed FG :(.

4th and 4 at USF 19
(4:15 - 1st) Jake Elliott 36 yd FG MISSED

That does not count The Red Zone is inside the 20. So a field goal from the 36 is not a Red Zone play.

Lol I know what the redzone is.

It was from the 19. I bolder the play so you could see .

(10-25-2015 11:57 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 09:26 PM)DallasTiger Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 07:51 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(10-25-2015 05:06 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  do you realize... if not for taking a knee in Victory formation to run out the clock one time, we could be perfect in the red zone?

That was last year.

This year it was unfortunately a missed FG :(.

4th and 4 at USF 19
(4:15 - 1st) Jake Elliott 36 yd FG MISSED

That does not count The Red Zone is inside the 20. So a field goal from the 36 is not a Red Zone play.

Lol I know what the redzone is.

It was from the 19. I bolder the play so you could see .

I am posting this at 5 AM in the morning. I woke up and said to myself...."Myself...wait, you can kick a 36 yard field goal and be in the red zone".
So, I grabbed my lap top and was going to correct my post and you beat me to it. Sorry, my bad. Somehow I was thinking the kick was from the 36 yard line which was not what you said. Actually, even if it was kicked from the 36 it could still be a red zone play if the team had penetrated the 20 and lost 16 or more yards and kicked a field goal . So.... I am going back to sleep.