Sexton is a turnover machine. He's worse than Tim Smith.

Kind of glad now that I cannot watch it. Game is playing out completely as expected.

(10-24-2015 04:34 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  Sexton is a turnover machine. He's worse than Tim Smith.

Is Torbush senile, serious question?

(10-24-2015 04:51 PM)etsuandpurdue3 Wrote:  

(10-24-2015 04:34 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  Sexton is a turnover machine. He's worse than Tim Smith.

Is Torbush senile, serious question?

1st half Stats


HERINK,AUSTIN
5-11 38 0 0 74.5

SEXTON,NICK
3-4 51 0 0 182.1

From a passing standpoint Sexton seems to be having a much better 1st half than Henrik especially in quarterback rating.

He is also guaranteed to turn it over twice a game.

(10-24-2015 05:18 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  He is also guaranteed to turn it over twice a game.

I agree he turns it over way too much, but I though Henrik was way better the first 2 to 3 games. Since then it has been a toss up as both have been awful. I am not sure either is a long term solution.

When do we recruit a real punter? When you average 20.8 yds a punt, you might as well go for it on every 4th down.

Jerman is a way better punter, I don't know why we stopped using him.

(10-24-2015 05:22 PM)BucinBama Wrote:  

(10-24-2015 05:18 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  He is also guaranteed to turn it over twice a game.

I agree he turns it over way too much, but I though Henrik was way better the first 2 to 3 games. Since then it has been a toss up as both have been awful. I am not sure either is a long term solution.

When you don't have a consistent player at QB, these things happen.

(10-24-2015 05:22 PM)BucinBama Wrote:  

(10-24-2015 05:18 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  He is also guaranteed to turn it over twice a game.

I agree he turns it over way too much, but I though Henrik was way better the first 2 to 3 games. Since then it has been a toss up as both have been awful. I am not sure either is a long term solution.

When you don't have a consistent starter at QB, these things happen. I know because at Purdue swapping out QB's never works and never will work.

At least we scored. That's all I can hope for now.

And there was the 2nd turnover.

(10-24-2015 06:38 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  And there was the 2nd turnover.

I have a hard time finding positives with this team.

Understandably, it is wearing thin (below). Torbush, Fulmer's man, and his "plan" have been treated most graciously -- considering all things. No one can argue that he recruited FCS level players. And to give these poor souls this schedule to play their first season is complete lunacy. How much longer will Noland tolerate this?


http://www.johnsoncitypress.com/Editoria...m&lp=1&p=1

Noland will tolerate this until Torbush retires. Torbush is in no more trouble than he was after the E&H game. The administration admitted today in the paper to the reasonable expectation of winning 4 games this year. We still may win 2.

(10-25-2015 09:37 AM)etsubuc Wrote:  Noland will tolerate this until Torbush retires. Torbush is in no more trouble than he was after the E&H game. The administration admitted today in the paper to the reasonable expectation of winning 4 games this year. We still may win 2.

Guess some have lower tolerance levels than others:


http://www.si.com/college-football/2015/...-al-golden

What can be said about what was said? Incredible.

http://www.etsubucs.com/football/news/20...e--warner/